On 09 Apr 2006, Adam Collins wrote:
> On Sunday 09 April 2006 04:54, Rick Friedman wrote:
> > I run chkrootkit daily. Today it has found a file it calls, "suspicious".
> > The file is a zero byte, hidden file. The path is
> > /usr/lib/xulrunner/.autoreg
> >
> > After seeing this warning, I also ran
On Sunday 09 April 2006 04:54, Rick Friedman wrote:
> I run chkrootkit daily. Today it has found a file it calls, "suspicious".
> The file is a zero byte, hidden file. The path is
> /usr/lib/xulrunner/.autoreg
>
> After seeing this warning, I also ran rkhunter (rootkit hunter). The
> report from rk
On Sun April 9 2006 11:53, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 07:54 -0400, Rick Friedman wrote:
> > I run chkrootkit daily. Today it has found a file it calls, "suspicious".
> > The file is a zero byte, hidden file. The path is
> > /usr/lib/xulrunner/.autoreg
> >
> > After seeing this warni
Rick Friedman wrote:
I run chkrootkit daily. Today it has found a file it calls, "suspicious". The
file is a zero byte, hidden file. The path is /usr/lib/xulrunner/.autoreg
After seeing this warning, I also ran rkhunter (rootkit hunter). The report
from rkhunter comes up clean. It does not fl
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 07:54 -0400, Rick Friedman wrote:
> I run chkrootkit daily. Today it has found a file it calls, "suspicious". The
> file is a zero byte, hidden file. The path is /usr/lib/xulrunner/.autoreg
>
> After seeing this warning, I also ran rkhunter (rootkit hunter). The report
> fr
I run chkrootkit daily. Today it has found a file it calls, "suspicious". The
file is a zero byte, hidden file. The path is /usr/lib/xulrunner/.autoreg
After seeing this warning, I also ran rkhunter (rootkit hunter). The report
from rkhunter comes up clean. It does not flag the .autoreg file (or
6 matches
Mail list logo