Hi Richard,
Am 2006-01-20 00:16:19, schrieb Richard Lyons:
> Hehehe.
> I do enjoy having you around, Michelle. I'm sorry I don't get any more
> of them now, so I can't join in.
But I let the filter activ.
As a kind of prevention. :-)
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
On Thursday, 19 January 2006 at 11:25:33 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2006-01-02 11:25:50, schrieb Gene Heskett:
>
> > If that was [EMAIL PROTECTED], bounce it to every address you
> > can imagine starting with sales & abuse @uol.br.com. I bounced about
> > 3 of them and it stopped, have
Am 2006-01-03 04:47:56, schrieb Andrew Vaughan:
> 2 weeks ago was right about the time of the debian-bounce-test message,
> which sent to everybody so that list admins could find the guilty mail
> address.
I have filtered then whole mailinglists and for users
sending from the UOL network to g
Am 2006-01-02 11:25:50, schrieb Gene Heskett:
> If that was [EMAIL PROTECTED], bounce it to every address you
> can imagine starting with sales & abuse @uol.br.com. I bounced about
> 3 of them and it stopped, haven't gotten one in about 2 weeks now.
@ROTFL@
I have created an auto responder in
Daniel Webb wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:00:48PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
I can't answer this for either of you, but I certainly have been
getting them, both here and on Fedora.
Can you put the full headers up? I'm curious if they're trying to send to me.
I have greylisting (the Deb
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:05, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Scott Muir wrote:
> > It sounds like someone sent out a test emailing to all the subscribers
> > to see who the "offender" is, and I don't know what the result of that
> > test was. I also know nothing of what kind of access the maintainers
> > have
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:00:48PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> I can't answer this for either of you, but I certainly have been
> getting them, both here and on Fedora.
Can you put the full headers up? I'm curious if they're trying to send to me.
I have greylisting (the Debian greylistd package
Mike McCarty wrote:
Daniel Webb wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 01:53:46PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
FWIW, I haven't seen a single one of these come back to me. Could it
be that only some are getting this or is it list-wide? (I assure you
I am not authenticated on petsupermarket...)
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 14:57:02 -0700
Daniel Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I haven't received any of these either. Welcome to the less-useful club.
>
:-p
A
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Well, its been an hour. No antispam message.
I have received 2 or 3 of them from posts I made 2 months ago or so, but
none for this so far.
And I never validated myself.
S.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.11/219
Daniel Webb wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 01:53:46PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
FWIW, I haven't seen a single one of these come back to me. Could it be
that only some are getting this or is it list-wide? (I assure you I am
not authenticated on petsupermarket...) could be someone onl
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 01:53:46PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> FWIW, I haven't seen a single one of these come back to me. Could it be
> that only some are getting this or is it list-wide? (I assure you I am
> not authenticated on petsupermarket...) could be someone only has
> selecte
Mike McCarty wrote:
Scott Muir wrote:
I'm just sort of watching this thread casually, so I don't have all the
facts... But is that stopping me? N.
:-)
me too.
<<>
FWIW, I haven't seen a single one of these come back to me. Could it be
that only some are getting this or is i
Scott Muir wrote:
I'm just sort of watching this thread casually, so I don't have all the
facts... But is that stopping me? N.
:-)
I have gotten the spam message in the past too, and I suspect I'll get it
for this one too. I have no desire to validate my email address on their
system ei
I'm just sort of watching this thread casually, so I don't have all the
facts... But is that stopping me? N.
I have gotten the spam message in the past too, and I suspect I'll get it
for this one too. I have no desire to validate my email address on their
system either.
It sounds like someo
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 02:40 am, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:52, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > I would think it would work better to write a script that automatically
> > cross references the DU and DD lists (since this jerk seems to be on
> > both), and generate a one time email (li
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:52, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>
> I would think it would work better to write a script that automatically
> cross references the DU and DD lists (since this jerk seems to be on
> both), and generate a one time email (like, "PLease confirm you are
> subscribed to this list!"), with ea
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 01:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (This has probably already been thought of and discussed. I'm not
> even saying this is the case here, just some thoughts.)
>
> Could this be a new form of mild denial-of-service attack? Imagine,
> someone who has a grudge against a
(This has probably already been thought of and discussed. I'm not
even saying this is the case here, just some thoughts.)
Could this be a new form of mild denial-of-service attack? Imagine,
someone who has a grudge against a mailing list finds some addresses
that have anti-spam autoresponders li
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1/2/06, Andrew Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 03:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Monday 02 January 2006 01:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >I just posted a message to the list, and immediately received an
> > > >
On 1/2/06, Andrew Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 03:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Monday 02 January 2006 01:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >I just posted a message to the list, and immediately received an
> > >e-mail from someone's anti-spam system wanting me to confirm
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 03:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2006 01:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I just posted a message to the list, and immediately received an
> >e-mail from someone's anti-spam system wanting me to confirm that I'm
> >a real person.
> >
[...]
> If that was [EMAIL PRO
On Monday 02 January 2006 01:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I just posted a message to the list, and immediately received an
>e-mail from someone's anti-spam system wanting me to confirm that I'm
>a real person.
>
>Geez, just imagine if everyone on the list had one of these. We'd
> get tons of auto
I just posted a message to the list, and immediately received an
e-mail from someone's anti-spam system wanting me to confirm that I'm
a real person.
Geez, just imagine if everyone on the list had one of these. We'd get
tons of auto-responses to every post we make.
So, to the reason I'm writing
24 matches
Mail list logo
