On Sunday 02 January 2005 11:53 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 23:15 -0800, Rich Rudnick wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 20:30 -0600, Kent West wrote:
> > > Tom Allison wrote:
> > >
> > > > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Monday 27 December 2004 02:56 pm, Kent West wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 05:36 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:48:11AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Monday 03 January 2005 12:03 am, Rich Rudnick wrote:
> >
> > > Poets aren't always stupid, but they do fall within Sturgeon's Law:
> > > 80% of everything is [crap].
> >
>
On Monday 03 January 2005 02:36 am, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:48:11AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Monday 03 January 2005 12:03 am, Rich Rudnick wrote:
> >
> > > Poets aren't always stupid, but they do fall within Sturgeon's
Law:
> > > 80% of everything is [crap].
> >
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:48:11AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Monday 03 January 2005 12:03 am, Rich Rudnick wrote:
>
> > Poets aren't always stupid, but they do fall within Sturgeon's Law:
> > 80% of everything is [crap].
>
> Including your recollection of Sturgeon's Law. It's 90%. 8:o)
On Monday 03 January 2005 12:03 am, Rich Rudnick wrote:
> Poets aren't always stupid, but they do fall within Sturgeon's Law:
> 80% of everything is [crap].
Including your recollection of Sturgeon's Law. It's 90%. 8:o)
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/
pgp
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 01:53 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 23:15 -0800, Rich Rudnick wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 20:30 -0600, Kent West wrote:
> > > Tom Allison wrote:
> > >
> > > > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Monday 27 December 2004 02:56 pm, Kent West wrote:
>
On Sunday 02 January 2005 11:53 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 23:15 -0800, Rich Rudnick wrote:
> > Rap is not congruent with stupidity :)
>
> No, but the correlation is high.
Not anywhere near as high as the correlation between stupidity and
Windows or stupidity and RPM or alcoh
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 23:15 -0800, Rich Rudnick wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 20:30 -0600, Kent West wrote:
> > Tom Allison wrote:
> >
> > > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Monday 27 December 2004 02:56 pm, Kent West wrote:
[snip]
>
> Rap is not congruent with stupidity :)
No, but the corre
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 20:30 -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Tom Allison wrote:
>
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday 27 December 2004 02:56 pm, Kent West wrote:
> >>
> >>> William Ballard wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> One must pick boring names, like "Word" :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> John 1:1
> >>>
> >>>
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 23:38 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:21:48PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Yes, sadly Marketing has reached a new level. Shame it has come to this.
>
>
> You mean like Operating System Version 10?
>
Whatch' you talkin' 'bout, Willis?
Mac OSX?
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:21:48PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> Yes, sadly Marketing has reached a new level. Shame it has come to this.
You mean like Operating System Version 10?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 20:30 -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Tom Allison wrote:
>
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday 27 December 2004 02:56 pm, Kent West wrote:
> >>
> >>> William Ballard wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> One must pick boring names, like "Word" :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> John 1:1
> >>>
> >>>
Tom Allison wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Monday 27 December 2004 02:56 pm, Kent West wrote:
William Ballard wrote:
One must pick boring names, like "Word" :-)
John 1:1
Yep; that one should be free of controversy.
Hah! No kidding. For those who do not have a Bible, the verse cited
reads, "In
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Monday 27 December 2004 02:56 pm, Kent West wrote:
William Ballard wrote:
One must pick boring names, like "Word" :-)
John 1:1
Yep; that one should be free of controversy.
Hah! No kidding. For those who do not have a Bible, the verse cited
reads, "In the beginning was th
On Monday 27 December 2004 03:19 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Well, whatcha' 'spect from a bunch o' gol darned Commie Atheistic
> Hippies up there in Starbuck-land???
>
> They probably wear Birkenstocks, too
More like Nike sandals (Oregon company), and this time of year, only
properly worn with
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 16:56 -0600, Kent West wrote:
> William Ballard wrote:
>
> >One must pick boring names, like "Word" :-)
> >
> >
> >
>
> John 1:1
>
> Yep; that one should be free of controversy.
Well, whatcha' 'spect from a bunch o' gol darned Commie Atheistic
Hippies up there in Starbuc
On Monday 27 December 2004 02:56 pm, Kent West wrote:
> William Ballard wrote:
>
> >One must pick boring names, like "Word" :-)
>
> John 1:1
>
> Yep; that one should be free of controversy.
Hah! No kidding. For those who do not have a Bible, the verse cited
reads, "In the beginning was the W
William Ballard wrote:
One must pick boring names, like "Word" :-)
John 1:1
Yep; that one should be free of controversy.
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18 matches
Mail list logo
