Scott Gifford wrote:
Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
I noticed that on her machine, QEMU does not eat lots of CPU, while
on my machine, it eats the machine. I've copied the exact raw image
disc from her machine to mine, but QEMU eats my CPU.
Perhaps it's a difference in proc
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 00:59 -0400, Scott Gifford wrote:
> Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > I noticed that on her machine, QEMU does not eat lots of CPU, while
> > on my machine, it eats the machine. I've copied the exact raw image
> > disc from her machine to mine, but QEM
Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I noticed that on her machine, QEMU does not eat lots of CPU, while
> on my machine, it eats the machine. I've copied the exact raw image
> disc from her machine to mine, but QEMU eats my CPU.
Perhaps it's a difference in processor features. Newe
Mike McCarty wrote:
[...]
> I haven't been able to build kqemu. It has include path problems.
>
> [snip]
>
>> Alternatively, install Daniel Baumann's deb package [2] instead of the
>> official
>> QEMU package.
kqemu is available in Etch. Install kqemu-common and kqemu-modules-2.6-486 (or
whateve
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Chris Lale wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
> gmane.linux.debian.user:
>
>> [2] http://archive.daniel-baumann.ch/debian/packages-other/qemu/
>
> Browsing through the tree, I can't figure out how to make a sources.list
> line from this... hing please?
>
I just
Chris Lale wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
> [2] http://archive.daniel-baumann.ch/debian/packages-other/qemu/
Browsing through the tree, I can't figure out how to make a sources.list
line from this... hing please?
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Goog
Chris Lale wrote:
1. QEMU is slow.
Yes, and it's a CPU hog. But, it's faster than BOCHS.
2. If you install kqemu, QEMU will run faster. Make sure to "modprobe kqemu
major=0" first. QEMU will use kqemu automatically if it is installed. Run QEMU
from a terminal window and you will get a messa
On Tuesday 26 June 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2. If you install kqemu, QEMU will run faster. Make sure to "modprobe kqemu
> major=0" first. QEMU will use kqemu automatically if it is installed. Run
> QEMU from a terminal window and you will get a message if it is unable to
> find kqemu.
I ne
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>[mike wrote]
Andrew J. Barr wrote:
kqemu allows code to be executed directly and natively on the
bare-metal processor under certain conditions. This takes QEMU's
dynamic translation engine out of the picture and allows for
near-native performance of x86-on-x86 (32
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Andrew J. Barr wrote:
>>
>> kqemu allows code to be executed directly and natively on the
>> bare-metal processor under certain conditions. This takes QEMU's
>> dynamic translation engine out of the picture and allows for
>> near-
Andrew J. Barr wrote:
kqemu allows code to be executed directly and natively on the
bare-metal processor under certain conditions. This takes QEMU's
dynamic translation engine out of the picture and allows for
near-native performance of x86-on-x86 (32 or 64 bit) situations.
It turns kqemu into
Chris Lale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that kqemu reduces processor load. This may be the reason
> for your different experience.
kqemu allows code to be executed directly and natively on the
bare-metal processor under certain conditions. This takes QEMU's
dynamic translation engine ou
Mike McCarty wrote:
> This question is really Really REALLY off topic!
>
> I administer my girl friend's Debian machine for her, but do
> not run Debian myself. I installed QEMU on my machine (Fedora
> Core) from source, and installed the Debian release on hers.
> She's pretty happy now running so
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 12:25:27PM -0400, Matthew K Poer wrote:
> Perhaps, if you enabled non-free software on her computer, kqemu is
> installed?
> it is a processor accelerator for qemu, but it is not DFSG-compliant, so it
> is in the non-free repo.
>
I agree this is probably it. kqemu makes
Matthew K Poer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps, if you enabled non-free software on her computer, kqemu is
> installed? it is a processor accelerator for qemu, but it is not
> DFSG-compliant, so it is in the non-free repo.
kqemu is free software as of a few months ago.
--
Andrew J. Barr
W
Hi Matthew.
Matthew K Poer, 25.06.2007 18:25:
> Perhaps, if you enabled non-free software on her computer, kqemu is
> installed?
> it is a processor accelerator for qemu, but it is not DFSG-compliant, so it
> is in the non-free repo.
Not anymore. It’s licensed unter GPL since February.
Regar
Perhaps, if you enabled non-free software on her computer, kqemu is installed?
it is a processor accelerator for qemu, but it is not DFSG-compliant, so it
is in the non-free repo.
On Monday 25 June 2007 12:17 pm, Mike McCarty wrote:
> This question is really Really REALLY off topic!
>
> I admini
This question is really Really REALLY off topic!
I administer my girl friend's Debian machine for her, but do
not run Debian myself. I installed QEMU on my machine (Fedora
Core) from source, and installed the Debian release on hers.
She's pretty happy now running some stuff. But I noticed that
on
18 matches
Mail list logo
