Re: OT: MS C++.net vs Borland Builder (with Linux support in future)

Paul McHale wrote: > > Hi, > > I have to decide between Borland C++ builder and MS.NET for a relatively > simple windows GUI development. Given there are quite a few very > experienced developers here, I thought some of you may have preferences. > > I am new to C++ and builder looks much simpl

OT: MS C++.net vs Borland Builder (with Linux support in future)

Hi, I have to decide between Borland C++ builder and MS.NET for a relatively simple windows GUI development. Given there are quite a few very experienced developers here, I thought some of you may have preferences. I am new to C++ and builder looks much simpler to develop for. Any recommendati