On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:58:17AM -0400, Steve Barr wrote:
> Searching through the archives I found this message. Exactly what I want to
> accomplish, but I can't get it to work.
>
> I installed procmail and copied the recipe to /etc/procmailrc. Then I sent
> myself a test message, the attachme
Searching through the archives I found this message. Exactly what I want to
accomplish, but I can't get it to work.
I installed procmail and copied the recipe to /etc/procmailrc. Then I sent
myself a test message, the attachment still came though as .vbs. If I copy
/etc/procmailrc to ~/.procmai
also sprach Colin Cashman (on Tue, 13 Feb 2001 01:35:57PM -0500):
> I can see the sign hanging on the walls of Microsoft:
> "Security, Standards, Sensibility: Choose Two."
two? i think the siign rather says: "do one and we'll fire you."
martin
[greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL P
> can someone give me anything that micro$oft ever did which makes
> sense, is secure, and abides to standards???
haha.. It should be M$ help...
You can select from ton of question, and you can never find your
answer.. I may say the only answer is 'contact with our support'..
That's make sense..
> can someone give me anything that micro$oft ever did which makes
> sense, is secure, and abides to standards???
*chuckle*
I can see the sign hanging on the walls of Microsoft:
"Security, Standards, Sensibility: Choose Two."
;)
also sprach William Leese (on Tue, 13 Feb 2001 01:38:16PM +0100):
> "An Internet-based email worm that masquerades as a picture of tennis star
> Anna Kournikova"
:)
we have it on campus. it's nasty. however, it's easy to disinfect and
i was fortunate enough to react immediately to the first occur
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:41:35AM -0600, Rob VanFleet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 03:46:11PM +0100, Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> > while it is tru you can remove most scriptin support with removin the
> > microsoft scripting host, what if you're a developer ? Or you're environment
> > requires yo
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 03:46:11PM +0100, Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> while it is tru you can remove most scriptin support with removin the
> microsoft scripting host, what if you're a developer ? Or you're environment
> requires you to be able to run scripts ?
I surprised no one has thought of this.
> > while it is tru you can remove most scriptin support
> > with removin the microsoft scripting host, what if
> > you're a developer ? Or you're environment requires
> > you to be able to run scripts ?
Use a different e-mail client... ;-) That's not too difficult to do,
unlike suggesting that pe
> while it is tru you can remove most scriptin support with removin the
> microsoft scripting host, what if you're a developer ? Or you're environment
> requires you to be able to run scripts ?
Then you have a handful of choices.
1. Run a virus scanner, and make sure you update it EVERY DAY (even
13, 2001 3:41 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: OT: M$ Outlook Virus
> William Leese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > can someone tell me why an email client needs
> > visual basic scripting and java/script support when
> > it is obviously a high secur
> William Leese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > can someone tell me why an email client needs
> > visual basic scripting and java/script support when
> > it is obviously a high security risk?
Outlook Express is actually a "module" or subset of Internet Explorer.
It would be somewhat unreasonable
William Leese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> can someone tell me why an email client needs visual basic scripting and
> java/script support when it is obviously a high security risk?
Because it was easier to leave them in than to take them out? That's
the problem with writing reusable components
Just for anyone who still dual boots that evil OS ;)
"An Internet-based email worm that masquerades as a picture of tennis star
Anna Kournikova"
"spreading twice as fast as the Love Bug".
"The worm comes in an email with the subject line "Here you have, ;o)" and an
attachment called AnnaKourn
14 matches
Mail list logo
