Re: OT: Land Use Decisions (was Re: Request to remove Information)

Patrick Wiseman wrote: On 11/19/05, *Steve Lamb* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Tom's request to remove information revealed more about the population of the list than about Tom... H -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: OT: Land Use Decisions (was Re: Request to remove Information)

You've said your piece; I've said mine.  I have nothing new to say on the subject and apparently neither do you.  So I'm back to our regularly-scheduled programming on debian-user, you know, conversations about using Debian. Patrick

Re: OT: Land Use Decisions (was Re: Request to remove Information)

Let us not forget that the right to own private property underlies the entire system of government in the USA. Nowhere in the founding documents or writings will be found an argument that property ownership rights end when another person can promise the government more tax revenue. To suggest or

Re: OT: Land Use Decisions (was Re: Request to remove Information)

Patrick Wiseman wrote: > OK, then you've bought the right-wing ranters' version of what the Kelo > decision said. Yes, because we all know if it isn't mainstream it's right-wing. The irony being, of course, that it was the right that was in the majority with the left, O'Conner, writing the d

OT: Land Use Decisions (was Re: Request to remove Information)

On 11/19/05, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Patrick Wiseman wrote:> This thread is just way out of hand[1], but if you're speaking of the US> Supreme Court's decision in _Kelo v. New London_, you've apparently> bought the MSM's spin on it. Nope, tend to ignore MSM for the rubbish it is.