On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 06:20:00PM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. Does that mean you'd recommend using Blackdown's
JDK
> rather than Sun's?
in my experience, i highly recommend blackdown's over sun's. sun's
had this strange bug which reared its ugly head when the stack size
wa
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 06:20:00PM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
| Hi dman!
|
| Thanks for your quick reply!
|
| On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, dman wrote:
|
| > [...]
| > What is a "real" thread?
|
| Unfortunately, that wasn't clarified further in the documentation.
|
| > [...]
| > Perhaps they (or you
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 18:25:28 +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> > Some people's definition of that seems to include hybrid user and kernel
> > space threading, and in that case, the statement is correct.
>
> Is this a big disadvantage for Linux comp
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 18:20:00 +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
> When you say Java, you are probably referring to Sun JDK 1.3, right? Do
> you know by chance why it doesn't support kernel threads on Linux?
Because it would give Java developers under Un*x less incentive to "upgrade"
from free Unices
Hi Ray!
Thanks for your quick reply!
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> [...]
> Some people's definition of that seems to
> include hybrid user and kernel space threading, and in that case, the
> statement is correct.
Is this a big disadvantage for Linux compared to other OSes?
Hi dman!
Thanks for your quick reply!
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, dman wrote:
> [...]
> What is a "real" thread?
Unfortunately, that wasn't clarified further in the documentation.
> [...]
> Perhaps they (or you, I haven't checked the website) meant to say that
> _java_ on linux doesn't use kernel
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 17:52:15 +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
> I read that Linux allegedly does not support "real threads". My questions
> on this issue are:
>
> 1. Is that statement correct at all?
That question is impossible to answer without a definition of what
constitutes "real threading". So
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 05:52:15PM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
| Hi!
|
| This is a rather general Linux kernel/glibc issue. In the JBoss
| documentation
|
| http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/ch10s02.html
|
| I read that Linux allegedly does not support "real threads". My questions
| o
Hi!
This is a rather general Linux kernel/glibc issue. In the JBoss
documentation
http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/ch10s02.html
I read that Linux allegedly does not support "real threads". My questions
on this issue are:
1. Is that statement correct at all?
2. If its correct, wh
9 matches
Mail list logo
