> This looks strange for me, as I would think, the AP on the computer
> would also need some processing time for recognition, correction and
> routing to the host.
Try it!
If you notice an important performance penalty, *then* come back with
the numbers and the details of your setup, so someone c
Hans writes:
> This looks strange for me, as I would think, the AP on the computer
> would also need some processing time for recognition, correction and
> routing to the host.
Every packet is routed by the kernel. There is no seperate "AP".
How much delay matters? Ping should be under a millis
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 15:40:07 +0200
Hans wrote:
>
> Then use NGINX with RTMP-module listening on its standard port and
> streaming with RTMP from Computer A to Computer B to the standard
> port.
>
> Everything without any AP or router between.
>
> The stream can then be made visible with VLC
Hans writes:
> yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will be then
> again a new hop, which causes delay (and I suppose, a software router is
> sklower than a hardware device).
I haven't tried this, but take a look at:
https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/AdHoc
https://help.u
On 2025-03-30, John Hasler wrote:
> Hans writes:
>> This looks strange for me, as I would think, the AP on the computer
>> would also need some processing time for recognition, correction and
>> routing to the host.
>
> Every packet is routed by the kernel. There is no seperate "AP".
>
> How much
Am Sonntag, 30. März 2025, 21:41:30 CEST schrieb debian-u...@howorth.org.uk:
> Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > If you make the storage server the access point
>
> What storage server?
> I thought this was about live video display from a drone?
Oh sorry, maybe I did the wrong expr
On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 9:29 AM Hans wrote:
> Am Samstag, 29. März 2025, 19:21:39 CEST schrieb Stefan Monnier:
> > >> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> > >
> > > yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will
> > > be then again a new hop, w
Hi folks,
thank you very much for all your respose! It was so hepfull amnd I have again
again a lot.
You showed me different ways using software AP, ad-hoc and gave me many
informations.
I will test all these things now, what will take me some time.
All my questions are fully answered and so
Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
[snip]
> If you make the storage server the access point
What storage server?
I thought this was about live video display from a drone?
On Sun 30 Mar 2025 at 15:40:07 (+0200), Hans wrote:
> > What new hop? You said you had the setup:
> >
> > hostA≡E--cat5/6--cable--∃≡hostB
>
> no, I have no cable setup, I just said, I know, how to setup when using a
> cable. Maybe I did not use the correct English idiom...
Yes
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 15:40:07 +0200
Hans wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > What new hop? You said you had the setup:
> >
> > hostA≡E--cat5/6--cable--∃≡hostB
> >
>
> no, I have no cable setup, I just said, I know, how to setup when
> using a cable. Maybe I did not use the correct Eng
Hi David,
> What new hop? You said you had the setup:
>
> hostA≡E--cat5/6--cable--∃≡hostB
>
no, I have no cable setup, I just said, I know, how to setup when using a
cable. Maybe I did not use the correct English idiom...
> where E and ∃ are ethernet sockets. (You don't norm
Am Samstag, 29. März 2025, 19:21:39 CEST schrieb Stefan Monnier:
> >> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> >
> > yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will
> > be then again a new hop, which causes delay (and I suppose,
> > a software router
On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 16:37:39 +0100
Hans wrote:
> > You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> > designed to then connect that AP to the rest of the network, so
> > that the AP is useful to wifi-only devices, but you can just
> > ignore that.
> >
> > Example at:
> >
> >
>> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will
> be then again a new hop, which causes delay (and I suppose,
> a software router is sklower than a hardware device).
No, if one of the PCs is the AP, then c
On Sat 29 Mar 2025 at 16:37:39 (+0100), Hans wrote:
> > You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> > designed to then connect that AP to the rest of the network, so
> > that the AP is useful to wifi-only devices, but you can just
> > ignore that.
> >
> > Example at:
> >
>
> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are
> designed to then connect that AP to the rest of the network, so
> that the AP is useful to wifi-only devices, but you can just
> ignore that.
>
> Example at:
>
> http://souktha.github.io/misc/create-ap-linuxpc/
>
> Cheers,
>
On 29/3/25 23:41, Hans wrote:
It is not important, if a router is givng the devices an IP-address. So I do
not need any dhcp. The IP-addresses can of course be set manually by me.
The more problem I see, will be the encryption and passkey-exchange, if
needed. However, I do not need encryption,
To clarify the access point will typically assign a subset of a class-C
> range for DHCP. It will usually be O.K. to assign static addresses in
> the same class C but out of the DHCP range
>
> An alternative depending on the router is to configure the router to
> have fixed DHCP addresses based o
On 29/3/25 23:01, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 29/3/25 22:53, Hans wrote:
But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed
IP`s and
give computer A the IP-address from computer B as gateway, and the
other way
round. Of course I my thinking was wrong (otherwise it would have be
On 29/3/25 22:53, Hans wrote:
But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed IP`s and
give computer A the IP-address from computer B as gateway, and the other way
round. Of course I my thinking was wrong (otherwise it would have been
worked).
The WiFi router usually assi
On Sat 29 Mar 2025 at 15:53:01 (+0100), Hans wrote:
>
> just a question: Is it possible, to connect two computers with linux via wlan
> without any router?
>
> I know, it is working with ethernet cable and crossover-cable.
>
> But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed
Dear list,
just a question: Is it possible, to connect two computers with linux via wlan
without any router?
I know, it is working with ethernet cable and crossover-cable.
But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed IP`s and
give computer A the IP-address from computer
23 matches
Mail list logo
