On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 13:45 -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:17:58AM +, Chris Halls wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 18:59 -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > > The other box does not find its attached printer and insists on using a
> > > generic printer which only sp
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 01:45 pm, Thomas H. George wrote:
> If oopadmin is started on Box #1 the add printer option apparently
> looks in the /usr/share/foomatic/db/source/printer directory - at
> least the only choices it offers are found in that directory and
> DeskJet drivers are not among these choi
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 01:45 pm, Thomas H. George wrote:
> If oopadmin is started on Box #1 the add printer option apparently
> looks in the /usr/share/foomatic/db/source/printer directory - at
> least the only choices it offers are found in that directory and
> DeskJet drivers are not among these choi
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:17:58AM +, Chris Halls wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 18:59 -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > The other box does not find its attached printer and insists on using a
> > generic printer which only spits out dozens of blank pages. If,
> > instead, I comment out exp
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 18:59 -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> The other box does not find its attached printer and insists on using a
> generic printer which only spits out dozens of blank pages. If,
> instead, I comment out export SAL_DISABLE_CUPS=1 openoffice finds the
> attached printer but
I have two boxes both using a kernel completed from kernel-source-2.4.26
and both using CUPS and openoffice.org.
Both have the latest dist-upgrade from testing.
On both I have edited /etc/openoffice/openoffice.conf and have enabled
export SAL_DISABLE_CUPS=1.
One box finds its attached printer,
6 matches
Mail list logo
