Re: OO.o 3.0.1 in Lenny

2009-03-01 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 08:44, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > > > 2009/3/2 Frederik Kriewitz >> >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Umarzuki Mochlis >> wrote: >> > Aside from official installer (that somehow corrupted, happened to every >> > tarball downloaded, don't know why), is there any backports o

Re: OO.o 3.0.1 in Lenny

2009-03-01 Thread H.S.
Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > Aside from official installer (that somehow corrupted, happened to every > tarball downloaded, don't know why), is there any backports or something? > Yes, I have the same experience with the deb from OOo. I ended up with extracting the contents from the deb based on ins

Re: OO.o 3.0.1 in Lenny

2009-03-01 Thread Umarzuki Mochlis
2009/3/2 Frederik Kriewitz > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Umarzuki Mochlis > wrote: > > Aside from official installer (that somehow corrupted, happened to every > > tarball downloaded, don't know why), is there any backports or something? > > It's available in the experimental repository. In

Re: OO.o 3.0.1 in Lenny

2009-03-01 Thread thveillon.debian
Frederik Kriewitz a écrit : > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: >> Aside from official installer (that somehow corrupted, happened to every >> tarball downloaded, don't know why), is there any backports or something? > > It's available in the experimental repository. > > I

Re: OO.o 3.0.1 in Lenny

2009-03-01 Thread Frederik Kriewitz
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > Aside from official installer (that somehow corrupted, happened to every > tarball downloaded, don't know why), is there any backports or something? It's available in the experimental repository. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-

OO.o 3.0.1 in Lenny

2009-03-01 Thread Umarzuki Mochlis
Aside from official installer (that somehow corrupted, happened to every tarball downloaded, don't know why), is there any backports or something? -- Regards, Umarzuki Mochlis http://gameornot.net