Reply-To:
Hi
Sorry about the offtopic post, please reply to me privately.
Does anyone know if there is a problem with slashdot.org at present. I can't
resolve its ip address using the root domain servers. I can however resolve it
using some of the web hosted DNS checkers on peoples web sites. Al
On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 11:11:27AM +0100, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
: "BM" == Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: BM> Why not date the betas? I think everyone knows what is happening when
: BM> you do this, and they aren't left wondering when the heck beta2 came out
: BM> when the
"BM" == Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BM> Why not date the betas? I think everyone knows what is happening when
BM> you do this, and they aren't left wondering when the heck beta2 came out
BM> when the name is 2.0-beta-1998-7-9.
Good idea. Subversions might be useful too.
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Philip Hands wrote:
> I needed to create some new CD images, because enough new bug fixes had hit
> the archive to make it worthwhile, and if I do that I have to differentiate
> the versions somehow: hence a directory name of 2.0beta1 for the first lot,
> and 2.0beta2 for the
Here's a comment I tried to post at slashdot, but slashdot is a bit broken, so
I'll mention it here before people get overexcited:
I seem to have caused a little confusion here.
I needed to create some new CD images, because enough new bug fixes had hit
the archive to make it worthwhile, and i
5 matches
Mail list logo
