Hello everybody out there!
On 2021/02/21 at 3:43 pm, Yoann LE BARS wrote:
> Well, before doing some strange tests, I would rather have an idea of
> what I am doing. So, can anybody confirms these versions of real-time
> kernel, Wayland and NVidia proprietary driver will work
when doing some intense treatment
in real-time music. I am not sure, but after a long history of troubles
it seems NVidia proprietary driver does works on real-time kernel nowadays.
I am also using Wayland. It also seems NVidia proprietary driver now
does work on Wayland.
What can
Hello everybody out there!
On 2019/10/28 à 3:56pm, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Do you have a particular reason to run the real-time kernel?
When you are running simultaneously several virtual synthesizers while
recording actual instruments, my experience is using the realtime kernel
is clearly
Yoann LE BARS wrote:
>
> Hello everybody out there!
>
> I am using Debian 10:
>
> $ cat /etc/debian_version
> 10.1
>
> I am running the real-time kernel from standard distribution
> repositories:
>
Do you have a particular reason to run the real-time kernel?
-dsr-
On Sb, 14 sep 19, 04:44:59, Yoann LE BARS wrote:
>
> So, here is my questions: is there any work done on Debian side to make
> NVIDIA proprietary driver working on Linux-rt? To make it run Wayland?
> How can I help?
This is the user's list, only few developers read
. The
problem is, by default proprietary driver does not compile for real-time
kernel. But it appears some people using Archlinux have found some way
to compile NVIDIA proprietary driver for real-time kernem:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-rt/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-96xx
> Did you add yourself to the bumblebee group?
>
> adduser $USER bumblebee ...as root
> where $USER corresponds to your username. Don't forget to log out and log
> back in for this to take effect.
Yes
> https://wiki.debian.org/Bumblebee#Installation
>
I think I am almost there! Bumblebee servic
I found something interesting
grep nvidia /var/log/Xorg.8.log
[ 4576.924] (++) Using config file: "/etc/bumblebee/xorg.conf.nvidia"
[ 4576.925] (++) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib/nvidia,/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
[ 4576.928] (II) Loading /usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.so
[ 4577.050] (II) LoadModule: "nvidi
> You should remove i915. You should have searched the Internet yourself.
>
> I used https://startpage.com/ with the search terms
>
> i915 wiki en
>
> and e.g. found https://wiki.debian.org/KernelModesetting
>
I also found this http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=110314
It means that I
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 21:28 +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
> I am not able to find out which driver I need to modprobe? I posted
> the output of lsmod before. If you can help me there?
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 23:10 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:39:11PM +0530, Anubhav Yadav w
> Stop X, modprobe -r the unwanted driver, modprobe nvidia, start X?
I am not able to find out which driver I need to modprobe? I posted the
output of lsmod before. If you can help me there?
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 12:04 +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
> I am a little new in all these so can you please tell me how can I use
> modprobe in this situation?
Stop X, modprobe -r the unwanted driver, modprobe nvidia, start X?
For startup perhaps update-modules, restart?
I would have to do Interne
>> What happens if you remove the module for the integrated graphics and
>> load the nvidia module at startup?
Here is the output of my lsmod
Module Size Used by
nls_utf8 12456 1
nls_cp437 16553 1
vfat 17316 1
fat
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 09:51 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote and
"The last update" of the archive "was on 10:00 GMT Tue Feb 18." -
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/02/mail2.html :
> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 11:18 +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
> > But Asus bios doesn't seem to have a setting to disable
> First thing I did, when I built a new Desktop machine, and inserted my
> nVidia card in, was to disable the onboard GPU in the bios setup. That keeps
> it all nice and clean, with regards to video detection. No need to have two
> dissimilar GPU's contending for display rights. You just wind up wi
On Monday 17 February 2014 13:34:36 Anubhav Yadav wrote:
> > Anubhav Yadav, please reply to the list only, don't Cc.
>
> I am using gmail and it has two options, reply and reply to all.
> If I hit reply your name is there as the sender, if I hit reply to
> all then debian user list is there in cc a
> And besides the command:
>
> bumblebeed service restart
>
> Do not restart the program.
[ 4558.021580] [ERROR]Daemon already running, pid 2798
Neither it would stop.
This was my output
>
> If you find a solution, please share with the list.
We will find a solution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 17-02-2014 05:44, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
Hello list,
I have a laptop with gt 630M 2GB graphics card. I installed the linux
headers and the drivers using this command:
aptitude -r install linux-headers-$(uname -r|sed 's,[^-]*-[^-]*-,,')
nvidia-kernel-dkms
[I referred this wiki : https://wiki.de
> Anubhav Yadav, please reply to the list only, don't Cc.
I am using gmail and it has two options, reply and reply to all.
If I hit reply your name is there as the sender, if I hit reply to all
then debian user list is there in cc and your name in senders list.
I will now manually delete the cc co
> OK, thats the driver for the Intel graphics chip.
> So you have an embedded Intel graphics in the motherboard *and* a
> plugged in NVIDIA Corporation GF108 card?
Yes!
But the docs wont help.
--
Regards,
Anubhav Yadav
Imperial College of Engineering and Research,
Pune.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:55:30AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > For Arch there isn't an entry "video" and running it as quasi chroot,
> > the Arch X anyway will be the used X, so I can't see the Debian's output
> > yet. Perhaps it's different for Debian and there are always "video"
> > entries.
to make sure I have the nvidia proprietary driver
running.
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:45:20 +0100
Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 11:35 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote a message that
also didn't came through the list:
> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 22:50 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:39:11PM +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
> > Right, which one?
> > root@tal:~# apt-cache search bumblebee
> > bumblebee-nvidia - NVIDIA Optimus support using the proprietary NVIDIA
>
> Yes, this one.
>
> > root@tal:~# lsmod | grep video
> >
>
> Output:
>
> uvcvideo
> And if it's not listed? Then you are probably going to have to do a
> lsmod anyway to see what is listed. I think my way solves the problem in
> one hit. IOW, don't search for what you *think* should be there, but
> search for what actually *is* there.
What is the conclusion in my case? Is nvidi
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:13:21AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 22:01 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > root@tal:~# lsmod | grep video
>
> I would search directly for the driver name ...
And if it's not listed? Then you are probably going to have to do a
lsmod anyway to see
> Perhaps also useful to check
>
> $ less /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>
> even if there are no EE (errors).
I could find anything even close to nvidia.
Here is the complete output:
http://paste.debian.net/82488/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 10:17 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote another mail that
didn't come through the list:
> > $ grep nvidia /var/log/dmesg
>
> A typo, it should be
>
> $ sudo grep nvidia /var/log/dmesg
Perhaps also useful to check
$ less /var/log/Xorg.0.log
even if there are no EE (errors).
--
> $ lsmod | grep nvidia
> if there's no output, you aren't using the nvidia driver.
> Run
> $ grep nvidia /var/log/dmesg
No output
> $ grep EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
Only output here is
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
[19.290] (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-
ges don't come through the list.
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Need to make sure I have the nvidia proprietary driver running.
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:00:42 +0100
Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 14:14 +0530,
> Right, which one?
> root@tal:~# apt-cache search bumblebee
> bumblebee-nvidia - NVIDIA Optimus support using the proprietary NVIDIA
Yes, this one.
> root@tal:~# lsmod | grep video
>
Output:
uvcvideo 57744 0
videodev 70889 1 uvcvideo
v4l2_compat_ioctl3216655
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:14:59PM +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
> I also created the Xorg.conf file as mentioned in the wiki. But when I
> rebooted my system Xorg failed to start. So i figured that I am having
> a GPU with optimus support and I do not need the Xorg.conf file but
> instead I need the
Hello list,
I have a laptop with gt 630M 2GB graphics card. I installed the linux
headers and the drivers using this command:
aptitude -r install linux-headers-$(uname -r|sed 's,[^-]*-[^-]*-,,')
nvidia-kernel-dkms
[I referred this wiki : https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers ]
I also cre
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 15:47:05 Curt wrote:
> You don't need cat:
>
> less /var/log/Xorg.0.log
That's great to know! Thank you. It's not the first time that I have come up
against that problem. Hopefully I won't in the future. :-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@l
On Monday 26 August 2013 23:07:29 Lisi Reisz wrote:
[snip]
>
> I don't want to reinstall and put up with
> nouveau if I can avoid it. :-(
I was running out of time, so I had to scrap what I was doing and do a fresh
install of Wheezy. The default nVidia driver that has been loaded
automatically
On 2013-08-26, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I read the postings fairly recently on this list, then Googled and found:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#configure
>
> I decided to follow that. I also followed the trouble-shooting recommended.
>
> I have checked and as a result of what I did
On Tuesday 27 August 2013 22:51:46 berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Le 27.08.2013 10:04, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > On Monday 26 August 2013 23:24:45 Greg Madden wrote:
> >> > (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
> >> > (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
> >> > (II) Module nvidia: ve
Le 27.08.2013 10:04, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
On Monday 26 August 2013 23:24:45 Greg Madden wrote:
> (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
> (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
> (II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
> compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
> Module clas
On Monday 26 August 2013 23:24:45 Greg Madden wrote:
> > (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
> > (II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
> > compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
> > Module class: X.Org Video Driver
> > (EE) NVIDIA
On Monday 26 August 2013 14:07:29 you wrote:
> I read the postings fairly recently on this list, then Googled and
> found:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#configure
>
> I decided to follow that. I also followed the trouble-shooting
> recommended.
>
> I have checked and as a resul
I read the postings fairly recently on this list, then Googled and found:
https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#configure
I decided to follow that. I also followed the trouble-shooting recommended.
I have checked and as a result of what I did, the following package is
definitely instal
On 2013-06-23 20:59 +0200, Doug wrote:
> Not sure what you mean.."free" as in you don't pay for it, or "free" as
> in open source?
Always the latter, this is what Debian is about after all.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 06/23/2013 01:28 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-06-23 19:03 +0200, Carl Fink wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, I tried the Free nVidia driver
>
> I'm afraid you are a bit confused, there is no such thing. At least not
> a free driver *from* nVidia.
>
>> (xvideo-xorg-video-nvidia)
>
> And
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 20:15 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 19:16 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > dkms
>
> I'm a dkms user on another Linux, but it has it's drawbacks too. You
> need to take care, that the kernel-headers are updated, before anything
> else is updated, if you want
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 19:16 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> dkms
I'm a dkms user on another Linux, but it has it's drawbacks too. You
need to take care, that the kernel-headers are updated, before anything
else is updated, if you want to automatically run it without rebooting.
There are ways to even
On 2013-06-23 19:47 +0200, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:28:20PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2013-06-23 19:03 +0200, Carl Fink wrote:
>>
>> > For what it's worth, I tried the Free nVidia driver
>>
>> I'm afraid you are a bit confused, there is no such thing. At least not
>>
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:28:20PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-06-23 19:03 +0200, Carl Fink wrote:
>
> > For what it's worth, I tried the Free nVidia driver
>
> I'm afraid you are a bit confused, there is no such thing. At least not
> a free driver *from* nVidia.
Perhaps I'm confused,
On 2013-06-23 19:03 +0200, Carl Fink wrote:
> For what it's worth, I tried the Free nVidia driver
I'm afraid you are a bit confused, there is no such thing. At least not
a free driver *from* nVidia.
> (xvideo-xorg-video-nvidia)
And this package does not exist, there is xserver-xorg-video-nvidi
image-3.9.1-amd64 but does not include nvidia-kernel-3.9.1-amd64
>> in which depends the nvidia proprietary driver.
>
> Well, it's amazing that there even are nvidia-kernel- packages
> in testing and unstable. These used to be built only near releases.
Maybe it would be better to not
For what it's worth, I tried the Free nVidia driver
(xvideo-xorg-video-nvidia) when I installed 3.9, and at least on my system
that worked *great* with no problems (except I had to uninstall the non-free
version manually). In fact it's way faster than the previous non-free driver
from nVidia, so ku
hich depends the nvidia proprietary driver.
Well, it's amazing that there even are nvidia-kernel- packages
in testing and unstable. These used to be built only near releases.
> So the result was a X system breaks, that cannot be loaded cause X.org
> not found the nvidia module. The issue
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 19:02 +0200, CHK Webmaster wrote:
> Any comment about how can this issue be reported?
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archiv
Hi,
I write here cause I'm not sure where report this issue. It happens when
upgrading my system via apt-get. The upgrade includes
linux-image-3.9.1-amd64 but does not include nvidia-kernel-3.9.1-amd64
in which depends the nvidia proprietary driver.
So the result was a X system breaks,
On Sb, 16 oct 10, 19:37:23, David Baron wrote:
> As followup to my post on Nouveau, which I would prefer using, the
> installation of the gallium experimental driver involves too many
> experimental
> packages. I installed nvidia's driver (for newer 620GeForce 6200 TurboCache)
> without a hitch
> >>> As followup to my post on Nouveau, which I would prefer using, the
> >>> installation of the gallium experimental driver involves too many
> >>> experimental packages. I installed nvidia's driver (for newer
> >>> 620GeForce 6200 TurboCache) without a hitch ... almost.
> >>>
> >>> AFTER X is
David Baron wrote:
As followup to my post on Nouveau, which I would prefer using, the
installation of the gallium experimental driver involves too many
experimental packages. I installed nvidia's driver (for newer 620GeForce
6200 TurboCache) without a hitch ... almost.
AFTER X is up, the console
> > As followup to my post on Nouveau, which I would prefer using, the
> > installation of the gallium experimental driver involves too many
> > experimental packages. I installed nvidia's driver (for newer 620GeForce
> > 6200 TurboCache) without a hitch ... almost.
> >
> > AFTER X is up, the cons
On 10/16/2010 12:37 PM, David Baron wrote:
As followup to my post on Nouveau, which I would prefer using, the
installation of the gallium experimental driver involves too many experimental
packages. I installed nvidia's driver (for newer 620GeForce 6200 TurboCache)
without a hitch ... almost.
AF
As followup to my post on Nouveau, which I would prefer using, the
installation of the gallium experimental driver involves too many experimental
packages. I installed nvidia's driver (for newer 620GeForce 6200 TurboCache)
without a hitch ... almost.
AFTER X is up, the consoles (alt-shift-F1...
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
In trying to solve my mouse foibles (previous post) I upgraded
xserver-xorg-core on my Sid box.
That upgrades xorg to 7.3.
Starting X with the proprietary Nvidia driver 9631 one runs into bug 44477.
The answer that was given to that bug ("don't use that driver") g
Hi,
In trying to solve my mouse foibles (previous post) I upgraded
xserver-xorg-core on my Sid box.
That upgrades xorg to 7.3.
Starting X with the proprietary Nvidia driver 9631 one runs into bug 44477.
The answer that was given to that bug ("don't use that driver") gets
tiresome: I don't u
Christian Convey wrote:
Figured this thread might interest y'all. Sorry to post it
mid-conversation...
Who knows where that thread goes: can't follow it, no time.
Anyway: In installing gnome-volume-manager I also lost the Nvidia
proprietary driver.
Reason is that the former instal
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:55:10AM -0500, Christian Convey wrote:
> - The FC3-style fix mentioned above seemed to do nothing. IIRC, Sarge
> didn't even *have* a /etc/udev/devices directory initially, which makes
> me suspect that FC3 and Sarge do udev somewhat differently.
A quick look at /etc/in
Figured this thread might interest y'all. Sorry to post it
mid-conversation...
Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
christian,
the html link from 4) below gives the commands to retrieve information
from your devices. read and use that. :)
Oh, you mean I should actually *read* your original email. ;) Sorry
abo
63 matches
Mail list logo
