Re: Not happy with Woody's Kmail and Konqorer Web Browser

2004-10-26 Thread Scotty Fitzgerald
David P James wrote: > On Tue 19 October 2004 19:41, Mateusz ?oskot wrote: >> User Scotty Fitzgerald wrote:: >> > Kmail because there seems to be no way to read just the email >> > headers and then deleting spam on the server and loading only what >> > I want. >> >> Did you try Thinderbird (Mozill

Re: Not happy with Woody's Kmail and Konqorer Web Browser

2004-10-25 Thread Scotty Fitzgerald
Thank you, Andreas, this worked for me! --- Scotty Andreas Janssen wrote: > Hello > > Scotty Fitzgerald (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: >> Andreas Janssen wrote: >>> Scotty Fitzgerald (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: >>> I was not completely happy with these two parts of the K desktop enviro

Re: Not happy with Woody's Kmail and Konqorer Web Browser

2004-10-22 Thread David P James
On Tue 19 October 2004 19:41, Mateusz Åoskot wrote: > User Scotty Fitzgerald wrote:: > > Kmail because there seems to be no way to read just the email > > headers and then deleting spam on the server and loading only what > > I want. > > Did you try Thinderbird (Mozilla based e-mail client) ? Come

Re: Not happy with Woody's Kmail and Konqorer Web Browser

2004-10-20 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Scotty Fitzgerald (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > Andreas Janssen wrote: >> Scotty Fitzgerald (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: >> >>> I was not completely happy with these two parts of the K desktop >>> environment. >>> [...] >>> Konqueror because it does not support HTTPS: >> >> Sure? Du you m

Re: Not happy with Woody's Kmail and Konqorer Web Browser

2004-10-20 Thread Scotty Fitzgerald
Andreas Janssen wrote: > Hello > > Scotty Fitzgerald (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > >> I was not completely happy with these two parts of the K desktop >> environment. >> >> Kmail because there seems to be no way to read just the email headers >> and then deleting spam on the server and loading

Re: Not happy with Woody's Kmail and Konqorer Web Browser

2004-10-20 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Scotty Fitzgerald (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > I was not completely happy with these two parts of the K desktop > environment. > > Kmail because there seems to be no way to read just the email headers > and then deleting spam on the server and loading only what I want. You can tell kmai

Re: Not happy with Woody's Kmail and Konqorer Web Browser

2004-10-19 Thread Mateusz Łoskot
User Scotty Fitzgerald wrote:: Kmail because there seems to be no way to read just the email headers and then deleting spam on the server and loading only what I want. Did you try Thinderbird (Mozilla based e-mail client) ? When Sarge becomes stable, will these things be changed? In my opinion you

Not happy with Woody's Kmail and Konqorer Web Browser

2004-10-19 Thread Scotty Fitzgerald
I was not completely happy with these two parts of the K desktop environment. Kmail because there seems to be no way to read just the email headers and then deleting spam on the server and loading only what I want. Konqueror because it does not support HTTPS: Two questions When Sarge beco