s. keeling wrote:
Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Paul E Condon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:13:59AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
[schnip]
Kent, there is a nice sociology/anthropology term for your attitude
toward Microsoft; for you (and me), Microsoft is 'ritually unclean
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:18:12AM +, s. keeling wrote:
>
> I like both characterizations, though the former is an insult to pigs.
>
That reminds me of a great teaser I heard I heard for the Neal Boortz
show once. He said something to the effect of, "That newspaper is a
hard left rag and I w
Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paul E Condon wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:13:59AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> > > [schnip]
> >
> > Kent, there is a nice sociology/anthropology term for your attitude
> > toward Microsoft; for you (and me), Microsoft is 'ritually unclean',
> > like pork to Musl
Paul E Condon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:13:59AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
DonDashGuitar wrote:
>Boot method: Net install. I've done four of them so far.
>
snip...
>created the file with no problems if it was named "cddr.img" and, happily
>enough, the Linux installer wasn't picky about
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 10:05 -0500, DonDashGuitar wrote:
> I attempted to report a problem with my video resolution following the
> outlined protocol I found in the support files as best I could. Given a
> space for commentary, and a stomach full of suppressed frustration I
> couldn't resist the ur
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:13:59AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> DonDashGuitar wrote:
> >Boot method: Net install. I've done four of them so far.
> >
snip...
> >created the file with no problems if it was named "cddr.img" and, happily
> >enough, the Linux installer wasn't picky about the name assigne
DonDashGuitar wrote:
Boot method: Net install. I've done four of them so far.
Image version: 31R2i386netinst
Date: The last was today (6-18) and the others over the last week or so.
1.IBM, Aptiva, 266 MHz, AMD-K6tm with 128 MB RAM
2.Dell, OptiPlex G1, 333 MHz, Intel, Celeron, 192 MB
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:05:02AM -0500, DonDashGuitar wrote:
> The official "Debian Bug Tracking System" notified me that "Message with no
> Package: tag cannot be processed!". So, it turns out that even complaining
> about Debian is an unnecessarily complicated process ...
Unnecessarily? Wit
At times I can say " I share your pain." This list has been very useful,
however.
Are you installing the distribution labeled testing or stable? I ask
this because the former has an older version of XFree86. What graphics
card(s) are you using? lspci should give you direction about which
drive
I attempted to report a problem with my video resolution following the
outlined protocol I found in the support files as best I could. Given a
space for commentary, and a stomach full of suppressed frustration I
couldn't resist the urge to do some venting. It all went for nothing
however because
10 matches
Mail list logo
