On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:15:35PM +0200, Ax. St. wrote:
> Thanks for replying so quickly. Unfortunately things are more complicated:
>
> - I have not only read the release notes but taken five machines through the
> upgrade
>process. This is the only machine that poses problems. The other ma
On Mon,20.Apr.09, 20:28:08, dr_a_stamm...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was careless enough to update from Etch to Lenny without completely
> removing all
> non-Debian packages, mostly from:
>
> deb http://www.backports.org/debian etch-backports main contrib non-free
&g
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 05:05:27AM +, Pigeon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case,
> > > where there isn't a convenient comma
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 07:52:18PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> 3) get the woody backport of X4.2 from
>http://people.debian.org/~blade/woody/ :)
Nah, just looked there. His is the testing version (4.2.1), I have
4.2.0. But thanks anyway.
Pigeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case,
> > where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg.
> >
> > My particular case is X 4.2.0, which
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case,
> > where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg.
> >
> > My particular case is X 4.2.0, which
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case,
> where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg.
>
> My particular case is X 4.2.0, which I downloaded the source of and
> compiled for slink, then for woody when I
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:01:25PM -0700, Hugo Graumann wrote:
> * On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:00:17AM +0100, mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Sorry, this error messages appaers on the install of this i2c package :
> > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of i2c-2.4.20:
> > i2c-2
Pablo Bianucci writes ("Non debian packages"):
...
> 3) Make an attempt to 'debianize' the packages, installing them under
> /usr/local with dpkg (my 'own debianization', in fact).
If you use dpkg it's perfectly acceptable to put the files in /usr,
rather than /usr/local.
Ian.
Hi!
I've upgraded to Debian 1.1 two days ago and have some doubts...
I used to have installed lots of packages I couldn't find in a debianized
form (fetchpop, ImageMagick, and lots more). I see several alternatives,
but I'd like a recommendation...
1) Wait till somebody releases a debianized pa
10 matches
Mail list logo
