Re: Non-intuitive kernel config change

On Mon, 13 Jul 1998, Jim Nicholson wrote: > > I just upgraded to hamm, and with that I moved from a hand-patched > 2.0.30 kernel to kernel-source-2.0.34. I made a kernel package and > installed it, only to discover that the ISO 9660 file system was not > built, because I didn't compile in NLS sup

Re: Non-intuitive kernel config change

In 2.0.35 (released today) NLS, FAT and ISO9660 are selected "Y" by default. Bob On Mon, 13 Jul 1998, Jim Nicholson wrote: > > I just upgraded to hamm, and with that I moved from a hand-patched > 2.0.30 kernel to kernel-source-2.0.34. I made a kernel package and > installed it, only to discover

Re: Non-intuitive kernel config change

Jim Nicholson wrote: > > I just upgraded to hamm, and with that I moved from a hand-patched > 2.0.30 kernel to kernel-source-2.0.34. I made a kernel package and > installed it, only to discover that the ISO 9660 file system was not > built, because I didn't compile in NLS support. > > This is mad

Non-intuitive kernel config change

I just upgraded to hamm, and with that I moved from a hand-patched 2.0.30 kernel to kernel-source-2.0.34. I made a kernel package and installed it, only to discover that the ISO 9660 file system was not built, because I didn't compile in NLS support. This is made particularly tricky by "make menu