Mark C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> same here from the debian sources, but with a few added patches,
> there is no need to download a new kernel, just get the source you have
> for the currently running kernel, apply this patch:
>
> -- cut -
> --- 1.31/mm
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:07:31AM +, Mark C wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 15:47, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> > I'm using that last one, 2.4.20.
>
> same here from the debian sources, but with a few added patches,
> there is no need to download a new kernel, just get the source you have
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 15:47, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I'm using that last one, 2.4.20.
same here from the debian sources, but with a few added patches,
there is no need to download a new kernel, just get the source you have
for the currently running kernel, apply this patch:
--
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 07:03:08PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> BTW, is it possible to use the make-kpkg method with kernels from
> kernel.org or is make-kpkg reserved for kernel-source-* packages?
Yes, thank goodness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
On 2003-12-05 09:14:01 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> my notes for the machine show I used
>
> wget ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.20.tar.bz2
>
> so much for taking good notes. I must have had some problem with the
> kernel.org version and just copied the package from a Sid
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:20:28PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2003-12-05 07:47:47 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> [...]
> > kernel-source-2.4.20 - Linux kernel source for version 2.4.20 with
> > Debian patches
> >
> > I'm using that last one, 2.4.20.
>
> But I don't think it has been fixed,
On 2003-12-05 07:47:47 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
[...]
> kernel-source-2.4.20 - Linux kernel source for version 2.4.20 with
> Debian patches
>
> I'm using that last one, 2.4.20.
But I don't think it has been fixed, as there is no version from
the security updates:
greux:~> apt-show-versions ker
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:39:44PM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > No, Debian didn't leave Joe User out in the rain to get his own kernel
> > source. All you need is apt-getable. Even a kernel package if you don't
> > want to compile just now.
>
> But this means downgrading to 2.4.18.
Right. I
On 2003-12-05 12:19:13 +0100, Christian Schnobrich wrote:
> If your only concern is the brk() vulnerability, you don't need to get
> kernel sources from and roll your own. I've seen this several
> times now, and not yet a single message to the contrary.
>
> No, Debian didn't leave Joe User out in
Hello,
I'm quite behind on reading this list, so maybe someone else has already
pointed this out, and anyway it's coming rather late. Still:
If your only concern is the brk() vulnerability, you don't need to get
kernel sources from and roll your own. I've seen this several
times now, and not yet
10 matches
Mail list logo
