On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:44:54PM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2022-11-14, wrote:
> >
> >> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/428
> >
> > Is there a non-javascript-ey way to look at those issues?
> >
>
>
> Mutt crashes with SIGSEGV when uid -variable is NULL in
> pgp_gpgme_extrace_keys().
>
On 2022-11-14, wrote:
>
>> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/428
>
> Is there a non-javascript-ey way to look at those issues?
>
Mutt crashes with SIGSEGV when uid -variable is NULL in
pgp_gpgme_extrace_keys().
Found in Mutt 2.0.5 (Debian 11 + 2.0.5-4.1+deb11u1).
Reproducible in:
2.1
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:46:25PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2022-11-14 11:39 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > If anyone figures out a way to make mutt NOT segfault when reading this
> > type of email, I'd love to hear it.
>
> Upgrading to 2.2.8 or later should do the trick. I can confirm
7;d love to hear it.
No problem here on bullseye with mutt "Mutt/2.0.5 (2021-01-21)", but
that might be because I'm unconcerned about checking signatures, so
something might be uninstalled or unconfigured. Here's what I see
when Gökşin Akdeniz's second message is read:
--✄---
On 2022-11-14 11:39 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> If anyone figures out a way to make mutt NOT segfault when reading this
> type of email, I'd love to hear it.
Upgrading to 2.2.8 or later should do the trick. I can confirm that
mutt 2.2.9-1 in unstable no longer segfaults displaying the message
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 07:33:00PM +0300, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
>
>
> 14.11.2022 15:26 tarihinde Anssi Saari yazdı:
>
> >
> > So does mutt try to check the PGP signature in Gökşin's message and
> > crash due to that or some other issue?
> >
>
> I use Thunderbird for reading, composing,sending
14.11.2022 15:26 tarihinde Anssi Saari yazdı:
So does mutt try to check the PGP signature in Gökşin's message and
crash due to that or some other issue?
I use Thunderbird for reading, composing,sending e-mail and signing and
encrypting, decrypting e-mail messages.
Probably it is why mut
steve writes:
> Le 14-11-2022, à 08:58:02 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
>>On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Henning Follmann wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>> Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
>>> That's weird.
>>
>>Confirmed.
>
> Here too.
>
> mutt 2.2.7 (2022-08-
Henning Follmann wrote:
Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
That's weird.
When I save the message as attachment, and run gnupg over it, I get this
error message
| gpg: CRC error; 3B73F1 - DC33B7
| gpg: quoted printable character in armor - probably a buggy MTA has been
Le 14-11-2022, à 08:58:02 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Henning Follmann wrote:
[...]
Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
That's weird.
Confirmed.
Here too.
mutt 2.2.7 (2022-08-07)
Hi,
Thomas George wrote:
> I thought to skip this step and tried
> gpg --verify SHA515SUMS.sign.txt debian-11.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
That's not the right way.
SHA515SUMS.sign verifies SHA515SUMS
SHA515SUMS verifies debian-11.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
The latter step can be done by this command in the
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Henning Follmann wrote:
[...]
> Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
> That's weird.
Confirmed.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> >
> > gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
> > Public Key
> >
>
> Debian public keys are listed on web pages for downloads. Here is the link
> for download page with checksums and public keys.
>
> https://www.debian.org/download
>
&
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 07:27:21PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> Still strugglng. command suggested returns new key but no user id - skipped
>
Please do not top post, especially not if answers were posted
properly in a chronological way.
here is what you should try:
gpg --keyserver keyring.debian
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
I thought to skip this step and tried
gpg --verify SHA515SUMS.sign.txt debian-11.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso with
the result Can't open signed data debian-11.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
Clearly I am making some eleme
tried
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
Debian public keys are listed on web pages for downloads. Here is the
link for download page with checksums and public keys.
https://www.debian.org/download
Keys:
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd
Hello,
13.11.2022 22:14 tarihinde Thomas George yazdı:
I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the iso
and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tried
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
Debian public keys are
On 13/11/2022 19:14, Thomas George wrote:
I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the
iso and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tried
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
I thought to skip this step and tried
I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the iso
and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tried
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
I thought to skip this step and tried
gpg --verify SHA515SUMS.sign.txt debian
What does "apt policy debian-archive-keyring" show? Which version (if
any) do you have installed?
You could also try "apt install debian-archive-keyring"
This should clear up the issues with stretch-updates, but not the
virtualbox repository. For that you'll need to find, verify and import
the re
Le 09/01/2018 à 07:33, Josh W. a écrit :
> I keep having the issue of no public key available and I don’t know what
> I should do…. Back up my computer and reinstall or is there a way to
> patch it up. I am attaching a file that shows what I am going through. I
> ran into all this th
Hi,
besides the good advise of John Doe about verifying an ISO, it should be
stated that "no public key available" during installation is not a typical
sign for a damaged ISO.
I'd rather suspect its intentional content being not being correct or maybe
the package mirror server
On 1/9/2018 7:33 AM, Josh W. wrote:
I keep having the issue of no public key available and I don’t know what I
should do…. Back up my computer and reinstall or is there a way to patch it
up. I am attaching a file that shows what I am going through. I ran into
all this this time will trying to
I keep having the issue of no public key available and I don’t know what I
should do…. Back up my computer and reinstall or is there a way to patch it
up. I am attaching a file that shows what I am going through. I ran into
all this this time will trying to install wine and adding to the
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Charles E. Blair wrote:
>When I type "apt-get upgrade" I get
> this message, and things stop:
>
> W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs:
> EF0F382A1A7B6500
>
>I hope there is a simple fix.
You can ignor
When I type "apt-get upgrade" I get
this message, and things stop:
W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs:
EF0F382A1A7B6500
I hope there is a simple fix.
26 matches
Mail list logo
