On Thu Aug 1, 2024 at 4:26 PM BST, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Related, Nginx is generally considered more secure than Apache. Nginx
> has approximately 220 CVEs, while Apache and friends has roughly 2700
> CVEs. Confer, <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=apache&g
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, 10:25 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> Walt E wrote:
> > I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian.
> > But I heard people says nginx + php has better performance.
> > Do you have experience on both of setup and share a bit with me?
>
>
> I h
3d printer driver, klipper,
uses nginx to build its control interface
I am answering based on OP's stated situation. You are answering
based on your personal circumstances and still making a big leap of
reasoning.
apache2 was probably tested and found wanting.
Fact that it's workin
Hello
I am currently running a simple Wordpress service with low traffic, so I
have not encountered any performance issues. Apache performs well. But I
will still try nginx+php fpm as a substitute when I have time. As for
reverse proxy, because I used CloudFlare, I think CloudFlare'
>
> > > The best, most expandable 3d printer driver, klipper,
> > > uses nginx to build its control interface
> >
> > I am answering based on OP's stated situation. You are answering
> > based on your personal circumstances and still making a big leap
On 8/1/24 10:31, Sarunas Burdulis wrote:
On 8/1/24 07:35, Walt E wrote:
Hello
I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian. But I heard
people says nginx + php has better performance.
That is not true:
1. https://people.apache.org/~jim/presos/ACNA11/Apache_httpd_cloud.pdf
2
On 8/1/24 09:34, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 08:54:22AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
Au contraire Andy.
What a surprise. Here we go again.
The best, most expandable 3d printer driver, klipper,
uses nginx to build its control interface
It doesn't matter what
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 10:40 AM Walt E wrote:
>
> I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian.
> But I heard people says nginx + php has better performance.
> Do you have experience on both of setup and share a bit with me?
Related, Nginx is generally considered more
On 8/1/24 07:35, Walt E wrote:
Hello
I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian. But I heard
people says nginx + php has better performance.
That is not true:
1. https://people.apache.org/~jim/presos/ACNA11/Apache_httpd_cloud.pdf
2.
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/choosing
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 02:57:51PM +0100, Alain D D Williams wrote:
> You need to profile & understand first.
It really seems more like a case of Fear Of Missing Out - "some
people said nginx is faster". 😀
I'm all for a fun learning experience, but I don'
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 08:39:11AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Do you have a performance problem? If not, don't change.
More to the point - what does the application do, where does its time go ?
Eg if you have complex database selects then the web server overhead prolly
only takes a small part of
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 08:54:22AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> Au contraire Andy.
What a surprise. Here we go again.
> The best, most expandable 3d printer driver, klipper,
> uses nginx to build its control interface
It doesn't matter what niche activities you (or I) enga
On Thu 2024/08/01 13:40:01+0200 (CEST), Walt E wrote:
Hello
I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian.
But I heard people says nginx + php has better performance.
Do you have experience on both of setup and share a bit with me?
Thank you.
Walt Evans
Hello,
**by default
On Thu 2024/08/01 13:40:01+0200 (CEST), Walt E wrote:
Hello
I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian.
But I heard people says nginx + php has better performance.
Do you have experience on both of setup and share a bit with me?
Thank you.
Walt Evans
Hello,
by default, Apache
Walt E wrote:
> I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian.
> But I heard people says nginx + php has better performance.
> Do you have experience on both of setup and share a bit with me?
I have experience on both.
Do you have a performance problem? If not, don't c
On 8/1/24 07:50, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 07:35:38PM +0800, Walt E wrote:
I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian.
But I heard people says nginx + php has better performance.
Do you have experience on both of setup and share a bit with me?
I do and I don&#
чт, 1 авг. 2024 г. в 16:46, Walt E :
> I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian.
> But I heard people says nginx + php has better performance.
> Do you have experience on both of setup and share a bit with me?
If your setup works fine, use apache2 as php runner.
Nginx nee
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 07:35:38PM +0800, Walt E wrote:
> I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian.
> But I heard people says nginx + php has better performance.
> Do you have experience on both of setup and share a bit with me?
I do and I don't think it
Hello
I have been using apache2 + php for years under debian.
But I heard people says nginx + php has better performance.
Do you have experience on both of setup and share a bit with me?
Thank you.
Walt Evans
Ciao Michael,
simply the old-style /etc/init.d "start" that you show in your
post did not suffice.
I do note that you seem to have a mix of TCP ports here; both 80, 8080
(in the requested URL) and 8090 (in the podman invocation).
After your email, I double checked and I reported wrongly the p
On 6 Jul 2024 13:58 +, from stetheww...@posteo.net (Stefano Prina):
> [container]$ tail -n 2 /var/log/nginx/error.log
> 2024/07/06 13:19:45 [error] 7365#7365: *1 FastCGI sent in stderr: "PHP
> message: PHP Warning: PHP Request Startup: Failed to open stream:
> Permission den
o use nginx and php-fpm,
the procedure I am using is :
[host] $ podman run -ti -p 8090:80 debian:12-slim
[container]$apt update && apt install vim nginx php-fpm
edit`/etc/nginx/sites-enabled/default` de-commenting the php part
# pass PHP scripts to FastCGI server
#
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 04:31:38PM -0400, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to set up a git server on Debian 12, served by Nginx via
> https. I used this as a debian-specific starter though I have done
> this in the past using a FreeBSD and Apache type setup:
>
tter wrote:
> David Mehler wrote:
>> I'm trying to set up a git server on Debian 12, served by Nginx via
>> https. I used this as a debian-specific starter though I have done
>> this in the past using a FreeBSD and Apache type setup:
>>
>> https://esc.sh
Hello,
I'm trying to set up a git server on Debian 12, served by Nginx via
https. I used this as a debian-specific starter though I have done
this in the past using a FreeBSD and Apache type setup:
https://esc.sh/blog/setting-up-a-git-http-server-with-nginx/
The client is a windows 10 c
> On 17 Jul 2023, at 02:29, David Mehler wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone have the above working? I've read several howtos on this
> and use to (way back) have it going on a *BSD with Apache setup, but
> I'm wanting to get Awstats going on Debian with Nginx a
Hello,
Does anyone have the above working? I've read several howtos on this
and use to (way back) have it going on a *BSD with Apache setup, but
I'm wanting to get Awstats going on Debian with Nginx and multiple tls
server blocks each a different domain. Manually running awstats.pl
Hello,
Can I get a sanity check on this config? I'm running Debian 12, Nginx
1.24.0, and PHP 8.2.
My goal is to have all non-www traffic redirected to the equivalent
www, then all that redirected to https, basically no https no www no
work. I'd also appreciate an assessment of my s
Tom Reed wrote:
> Though the question is not directly related to debian.
> But since most of you are sysadmin expects, may I ask that for running a
> simple web service, should I choose nginx or apache, and why? The service
> is combined by some php and python scripts, with redis a
пн, 29 мая 2023 г. в 12:14, Tom Reed :
> Though the question is not directly related to debian.
> But since most of you are sysadmin expects, may I ask that for running a
> simple web service, should I choose nginx or apache, and why? The service
> is combined by some php and python s
Hello list,
Though the question is not directly related to debian.
But since most of you are sysadmin expects, may I ask that for running a
simple web service, should I choose nginx or apache, and why? The service
is combined by some php and python scripts, with redis as backend DB.
Thanks.
Tom
Christian Britz wrote:
...
> Running and writing the blog. At the moment I tend to a static
> generator, which would probably also make archival easier?!
that is what hugo is. many themes to choose from or do your
own.
songbird
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:48:28PM -0400, Chris Mitchell wrote:
> I believe Apache and nginx both have fairly robust support for popular
> server-side languages like PHP, so many toolkits will work happily on
> top of either one.
nginx can be told to contact php-fpm in order to run PH
Thank you for your thoughts, Russel,
On 2022-03-11 18:40 UTC+0100, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Christian is talking about three different projects, each of which is
> demanding of time.
>
> Securing and maintaining a web server is a difficult matter. But when
> you can purchase hosting for US$4 p
often in the news with security holes... Don't want some
bad person to manipulate my cute tiny Raspi, now that it has finally
moved to pure Debian. ;-)
I want the solution to be in the repository to benefit from
unattended-upgrades.
i use hugo for my website. but hugo is not nginx.
Christi
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 22:39:34 +0100
Christian Britz wrote:
> Sure, I think I was not precise in my posting. I am willing to add
> something dynamic, and I was not sure if Apache and nginx support the
> same toolkits.
>
> You and others brought in several static content gen
't want some
> bad person to manipulate my cute tiny Raspi, now that it has finally
> moved to pure Debian. ;-)
>
> I want the solution to be in the repository to benefit from
> unattended-upgrades.
i use hugo for my website. but hugo is not nginx.
songbird
Take a look at https://dotclear.org/ which is PHP based.
Some time ago Debian also had it packaged.
Regards,
Jörg.
On 2022-03-11 06:06 UTC+0100, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Life is too short to mess around with a markup language other than
> LaTeX. Work always in LaTeX.
Next topic on my learning agenda. :-)
--
http://www.cb-fraggle.de
in LaTeX and provides me with a set of .html
files (and even a .css file) which I upload to a hosting service. One
hosting service I use runs Apache; the other runs Nginx. Both work.
In LaTeX, I use "report.cls" for the blog; each blog posting is a
chapter. The postings are listed in a t
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 22:14:18 +0100
Christian Britz wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-03-10 22:09 UTC+0100, Kevin Exton wrote:
> > You need a blogging CMS like WordPress, or alternatively some kind
> > of static site generator like GatsbyJS. Not sure what is or isn't
> > in the Debian repositories though...
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 22:06:34 +0100
Christian Britz wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I am looking for recommendations for setting up a blog with nginx web
> server. What I have so far: nginx-light with static pages.
>
> What would I need to be able to host a blog? I search somethi
little patience right in the beginning.
- Kevin
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022, 8:39 AM Christian Britz wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-03-10 22:16 UTC+0100, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > nginx is just a web server, apache is just a web server. Nearly
> > any blog can be set up with either one
On 2022-03-10 22:16 UTC+0100, Dan Ritter wrote:
> nginx is just a web server, apache is just a web server. Nearly
> any blog can be set up with either one of them, or a number of
> other servers. Static sites don't need language support in the
> server at all.
Sure, I think
On 2022-03-10 22:28 UTC+0100, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:06:34PM +0100, Christian Britz wrote:
>> I am looking for recommendations for setting up a blog with nginx web
>> server. What I have so far: nginx-light with static pages.
>>
>> What woul
Christian Britz wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I am looking for recommendations for setting up a blog with nginx web
> server. What I have so far: nginx-light with static pages.
>
> What would I need to be able to host a blog? I search something as
> simple and secure as po
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:06:34PM +0100, Christian Britz wrote:
> I am looking for recommendations for setting up a blog with nginx web
> server. What I have so far: nginx-light with static pages.
>
> What would I need to be able to host a blog?
A text editor, to create the static pages.
ng up a blog with nginx web
server. What I have so far: nginx-light with static pages.
What would I need to be able to host a blog? I search something as
simple and secure as possible, there will be very low traffic. It should
be available directly from the Debian stable repository. From w
On 2022-03-10 22:09 UTC+0100, Kevin Exton wrote:
> You need a blogging CMS like WordPress, or alternatively some kind of
> static site generator like GatsbyJS. Not sure what is or isn't in the
> Debian repositories though...
Thank you, I allow my self to reply on the list.
I heard that WordPre
Dear community,
I am looking for recommendations for setting up a blog with nginx web
server. What I have so far: nginx-light with static pages.
What would I need to be able to host a blog? I search something as
simple and secure as possible, there will be very low traffic. It should
be
Patrick Kirk wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 13:37, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Patrick Kirk wrote:
> >
> > 6. If serving dynamic content, where to get it
> >
> >
> > A program running on port 5000 is a fine place to serve dynamic
> > content from, b
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 13:37, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Patrick Kirk wrote:
>
> 6. If serving dynamic content, where to get it
>
>
> A program running on port 5000 is a fine place to serve dynamic
> content from, but you haven't told nginx about it.
>
> I'll bet
Patrick Kirk wrote:
> I am trying to run an ASP.Net Core site on my hosted Debian box and I seem
> to have messed up the configuration. All attempts to reach the page on
> port 80 get 403 Forbidden messages.
>
> My error log says: pk@debian-s-websites:~$ sudo tail -f
> /var/l
Hi all,
I am trying to run an ASP.Net Core site on my hosted Debian box and I seem
to have messed up the configuration. All attempts to reach the page on
port 80 get 403 Forbidden messages.
My error log says: pk@debian-s-websites:~$ sudo tail -f
/var/log/nginx/error.log 2021/12/13 06:27:24
> The very thing nginx tells you in the error message - "mail" directive
> is not recognized. Probably your installation is missing libnginx-mod-mail.
I showed above. There is a module. (nginx -V --with-mail) I compiled
nginx manually.
There seems to be a module. I added the email
Hi.
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 02:27:52PM +0300, Gokan Atmaca wrote:
> What could be the problem?
The very thing nginx tells you in the error message - "mail" directive
is not recognized. Probably your installation is missing libnginx-mod-mail.
Reco
Hello
I want to configure email proxy server with Nginx. Actually I already
do this with Postfix. But my goal is to make it Nginx. To learn... I
have configured Nginx with email module. You can see it below.
# nginx -V
nginx version: nginx/1.20.2
built by gcc 9.3.0 (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04
Hi.
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 12:03:36PM +0200, pk wrote:
> I got this message when installing nginx-light today. What does it
> mean and where does it come from? I could not grep it in the
> nginx-light .deb.
It's the usual nginx behaviour on restart.
Instead of shutt
I got this message when installing nginx-light today. What does it
mean and where does it come from? I could not grep it in the
nginx-light .deb.
# aptitude -D -V install nginx-light
Följande NYA paket kommer att bli installerade:
libnginx-mod-http-echo{a} [1.18.0-6.1] (B: nginx-light)
nginx
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:06:30AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 03 Nov 2020 at 08:03:24 (-0600), Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > Another (off-list) reply suggested using a script to edit nginx.conf
> > rather than doing it by hand, which looks like the best solution for my
> > specific case.
>
>
On Ma, 03 nov 20, 08:03:24, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 07:57:40AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 03:35:58AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > > tl;dr: I need to increase worker_connections on my nginx servers, but
> > > do
On Tue 03 Nov 2020 at 08:03:24 (-0600), Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 07:57:40AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 03:35:58AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > > tl;dr: I need to increase worker_connections on my nginx servers, but
> &
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 07:57:40AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 03:35:58AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > tl;dr: I need to increase worker_connections on my nginx servers, but
> > don't want to edit the debian-provided nginx.conf due to that causin
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 03:35:58AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> tl;dr: I need to increase worker_connections on my nginx servers, but
> don't want to edit the debian-provided nginx.conf due to that causing
> future upgrade hassles. Is this possible?
> Is there any way to acco
tl;dr: I need to increase worker_connections on my nginx servers, but
don't want to edit the debian-provided nginx.conf due to that causing
future upgrade hassles. Is this possible?
Long version:
I've got a couple servers running a somewhat convoluted web app
deployment, with ng
On 15/09/2020 10:44, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Another choice would be to run Debian stable, but don't install Debian's
> version of nginx. Use upstream's releases, compile them yourself, and
> update them yourself whenever you need to (for security reasons or
> otherwise
On 15/09/2020 10:38, Klaus Singvogel wrote:
> No: no new version.
>
> If you're unhappy with that, think about these choices:
>
> - install upcoming Debian 11 (Testing, Bullseye) and live with the changes
> of packages and possible errors in the system. Release date unknown.
>
> - install Debi
but don't install Debian's
version of nginx. Use upstream's releases, compile them yourself, and
update them yourself whenever you need to (for security reasons or
otherwise).
Personally I'd prefer to let the Debian security team do all that work
for me, but the OP seems to value large numbers for their own sake.
Hi Revanth,
Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
>
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
>
Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
>
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
> is, Can we expect the latest versi
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:23:11PM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
>
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some secur
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:23:11PM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
> is, Can we expect the latest version of NGINX(i.e. v1
Hi Klaus,
Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
is, Can we expect the latest version of NGINX(i.e. v1.18.x) to be available in
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:13:04AM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> 1.) Pertaining to Nginx there is no CVE-ID, main concern is,
> According to nginx download page, (http://nginx.org/en/download.html) Nginx
> 1.14.x is no longer supported and will not be getting regular patche
ara, Revanth wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> 1.) Pertaining to Nginx there is no CVE-ID, main concern is,
> According to nginx download page, (http://nginx.org/en/download.html) Nginx
> 1.14.x is no longer supported and will not be getting regular patches. So, if
> any security Vu
Hi.
Please do not top post.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:13:04AM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> 1.) Pertaining to Nginx there is no CVE-ID, main concern is,
> According to nginx download page, (http://nginx.org/en/download.html)
> Nginx 1.14
Hi Klaus,
1.) Pertaining to Nginx there is no CVE-ID, main concern is,
According to nginx download page, (http://nginx.org/en/download.html) Nginx
1.14.x is no longer supported and will not be getting regular patches. So, if
any security Vulnerabilities arise then system would be at
Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
>
> We have a system running on Debian 10 with Nginx v1.14.2, GNOME Evolution
> v3.30.5-1.1 installed along with other packages.
>
[...]
> When can we expect latest versions of Nginx and GNOME Evolution to be
> available in Debian 10 ?
Which se
Hi,
We have a system running on Debian 10 with Nginx v1.14.2, GNOME Evolution
v3.30.5-1.1 installed along with other packages.
1. Security Vulnerability with Nginx v1.14.2:
THREAT:
According to nginx download page, (http://nginx.org/en/download.html) Nginx
1.14.x is no longer supported
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 11:04:30PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 09 Nov 2019 at 23:15:00 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > [...] no brexit :)
>
> Can I do the Leader of the Free World, Trump, instead? :)
Uh-oh. You're about to extend Godwin.
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
On Saturday 09 November 2019 17:40:13 Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 15:59:54 -0500
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Millennials these days, so entitled!
> >
> > A Millennial Andy? I can proudly say I've outlived all my enemies.
> > Of course I've no clue how old your definition of a mil
On Sat 09 Nov 2019 at 23:15:00 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 08:49:02PM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 09 Nov 2019 at 15:40:09 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > > I did look, but couldn't connect the dots with what I was reading.
>
> [...]
>
> > Please do not write t
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 15:59:54 -0500
Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Millennials these days, so entitled!
>
> A Millennial Andy? I can proudly say I've outlived all my enemies.
> Of course I've no clue how old your definition of a millennial is.
> Enlighten me please. :-)
Gene, he didn't say *which* m
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 08:49:02PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 09 Nov 2019 at 15:40:09 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> > I did look, but couldn't connect the dots with what I was reading.
[...]
> Please do not write this sort of thing to -user. It does not add anything.
> If you think it does, I
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 03:40:09PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 09 November 2019 13:44:50 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > And it's not true that people haven't attempted to teach you
> > that. Many have pointed out you /should/ look into Apache
> > configuration (me, among many othe
On Saturday 09 November 2019 14:45:59 Andy Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 November 2019 10:07:43 Andy Smith wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:55:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > unforch, reinstalling apache2 is not a wor
On Sat 09 Nov 2019 at 15:40:09 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I did look, but couldn't connect the dots with what I was reading.
> That may be the result of a pulmonary embolism that damned near put a
> ~30~ on the end of my story when I was 79, and that did hurt the brain
> that tested at 147 70+
On Saturday 09 November 2019 14:01:11 Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri Nov 8, 2019 at 10:55 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > unforch, reinstalling apache2 is not a workable situation because it
> > was built for the repos w/o libwrappers support. Dumb and forces me
> > to run iptables to block the bots
On Saturday 09 November 2019 13:44:50 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 November 2019 10:07:43 Andy Smith wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:55:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > unforch, reinstal
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 09 November 2019 10:07:43 Andy Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:55:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > unforch, reinstalling apache2 is not a workable situation because it
> > > was built for the repos w/o libw
On Sat Nov 9, 2019 at 1:20 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> Then, if thats the case, why has no one attempted to teach me how to do
> all this iptables stuffs within apache2?
I'm not prepared to teach you iptables, or anything else. I might answer
specific, well-phrased questions. But I expect people to
On Fri Nov 8, 2019 at 10:55 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> unforch, reinstalling apache2 is not a workable situation because it was
> built for the repos w/o libwrappers support. Dumb and forces me to run
> iptables to block the bots that are DDOSing my site.
Blocking malicious connections with ipta
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 09 November 2019 10:07:43 Andy Smith wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:55:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > unforch, reinstalling apache2 is not a workable situation because it
> > > was built for
On Saturday 09 November 2019 10:07:43 Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:55:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > unforch, reinstalling apache2 is not a workable situation because it
> > was built for the repos w/o libwrappers support. Dumb and forces me
> > to run iptables t
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:55:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> unforch, reinstalling apache2 is not a workable situation because it was
> built for the repos w/o libwrappers support. Dumb and forces me to run
> iptables to block the bots that are DDOSing my site.
This is a really odd
On Tuesday 12 March 2019 07:25:34 Jonathan Sélea wrote:
> NGINX was recently acquired by F5:
>
> https://www.nginx.com/blog/nginx-joins-f5/
>
> I came to think of when Oracle bought MySQL and it was switched from
> debian in favour of MariaDB instead. Would NGINX get the same f
Uninstall it, re-install apache2, restore your working web server
configuration, and block the troublesome web scrapers using iptables or
similar instead.
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 06:40:35AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 November 2019 05:02:41 mick crane wrote:
>
> > On 2019-11-04 21:14, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Greetings;
> > >
> > > I guess the subject says it all.
> >
> > does this not work ?
> > https://nginx.org/en/docs/beginners_g
On Tuesday 05 November 2019 05:02:41 mick crane wrote:
> On 2019-11-04 21:14, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings;
> >
> > I guess the subject says it all.
>
> does this not work ?
> https://nginx.org/en/docs/beginners_guide.html
Yes, that works! And it also links to let me read the rest of the doc
On 2019-11-04 21:14, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
I guess the subject says it all.
does this not work ?
https://nginx.org/en/docs/beginners_guide.html
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
