On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:04:02AM -0500, detwy...@riseup.net wrote:
> > ... clicking on the date on the top panel should display my
> > appointments from Evolution...
>
> Is this documented? Please provide a reference
If you have Gnome installed and Online Accounts configured; usually Evolution
On Friday 12 December 2014 21:54:12 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Lisi Reisz [2014-12-12 10:00 +]:
> > On Friday 12 December 2014 09:21:31 Jeffrey Needle wrote:
> > > Hi. I'm pretty new to Debian. I just downloaded the 64-bit .iso and
> > > have just installed it. I have a question about th
* Lisi Reisz [2014-12-12 10:00 +]:
> On Friday 12 December 2014 09:21:31 Jeffrey Needle wrote:
> > Hi. I'm pretty new to Debian. I just downloaded the 64-bit .iso and
> > have just installed it. I have a question about the date display on the
> > top panel.
> >
> > My understanding is that
> ... clicking on the date on the top panel should display my
> appointments from Evolution...
Is this documented? Please provide a reference.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
Le 12.12.2014 11:00, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
On Friday 12 December 2014 09:21:31 Jeffrey Needle wrote:
Hi. I'm pretty new to Debian. I just downloaded the 64-bit .iso
and
have just installed it. I have a question about the date display on
the
top panel.
My understanding is that clicking on
On Friday 12 December 2014 09:21:31 Jeffrey Needle wrote:
> Hi. I'm pretty new to Debian. I just downloaded the 64-bit .iso and
> have just installed it. I have a question about the date display on the
> top panel.
>
> My understanding is that clicking on the date on the top panel should
> displ
Hi. I'm pretty new to Debian. I just downloaded the 64-bit .iso and
have just installed it. I have a question about the date display on the
top panel.
My understanding is that clicking on the date on the top panel should
display my appointments from Evolution, but it's not working. I have
lots
On 01/03/2012 12:52 PM, Martin, Larry D wrote:
I have Squeeze on an Intel box with CUPS installed and a PDF printer defined.
> What I cannot seen to make happen is to use a line command to cause a
file to
go to the printer and create a PDF document.
Larry
From a console or terminal you can s
On 04/01/12 03:52, Martin, Larry D wrote:
What I cannot seen to make happen is to use a line command to
cause a file to go to the printer and create a PDF document.
What command are you trying to use? And what type of file is that you're
trying to "print"?
--
Ashton Fagg (ash...@fagg.id.au)
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:52:52 -0500, Martin, Larry D wrote:
Welcome!
But please, keep html format off :-)
> I have Squeeze on an Intel box with CUPS installed and a PDF printer
> defined. What I cannot seen to make happen is to use a line command to
> cause a file to go to the printer and create
I have Squeeze on an Intel box with CUPS installed and a PDF printer defined.
What I cannot seen to make happen is to use a line command to cause a file to
go to the printer and create a PDF document. I can open the file with gedit
and print to PDF with no problem. What do I not understand ab
On Jan 28, 2008 5:05 PM, Geosand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jimmy Wu wrote:
> > Well, an update: I just ran the nvidia script today (169.09) and it
> > worked. I told it to not look for a precompiled interface on
> > nvidia.com, so it did some compiling on its own, I think, but anyways,
> > af
On Jan 30, 2008 5:07 PM, Jimmy Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I sort of have this working, there's a few more things I have to take care of.
>
> First, how do I add an entry in gdm to run compiz instead of xfwm4?
> I tried to use the method of putting a .desktop file in
> /usr/share/xsessions, po
On Jan 30, 2008 5:07 PM, Jimmy Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Secondly, is there some sort of compiz settings gui in debian etch? I
> couldn't find one, and the only thing I have available is
> gconf-editor, which is usable but difficult. For example, I wanted to
> turn off the wobbly plugin but
Jimmy Wu wrote:
I sort of have this working, there's a few more things I have to take care of.
First, how do I add an entry in gdm to run compiz instead of xfwm4?
I tried to use the method of putting a .desktop file in
/usr/share/xsessions, pointing to a script in which I run
nvidia-settings -l
I sort of have this working, there's a few more things I have to take care of.
First, how do I add an entry in gdm to run compiz instead of xfwm4?
I tried to use the method of putting a .desktop file in
/usr/share/xsessions, pointing to a script in which I run
nvidia-settings -l &
compiz --replac
Jimmy Wu wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 9:26 PM, Jimmy Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I will go with the nvidia installer. I'll post back with
results of how that goes.
Well, an update: I just ran the nvidia script today (169.09) and it
worked. I told it to not look for a precompiled
On Jan 25, 2008 9:26 PM, Jimmy Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I will go with the nvidia installer. I'll post back with
> results of how that goes.
Well, an update: I just ran the nvidia script today (169.09) and it
worked. I told it to not look for a precompiled interface on
nvidia.com,
On Friday 25 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, nv was what the installer picked by default and that didn't
> work for me (I was surprised by that, but maybe stable uses an older
> version of nv or something). Anyways, vesa worked, and it still does
> now, so that's what I'm using.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/25/08 20:26, Jimmy Wu wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 8:54 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>> You could get the unstable nvidia-glx source package and build it
>> using Stable tools. Might not work, though, because the latest
>> nvid
On Jan 24, 2008 8:54 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> You could get the unstable nvidia-glx source package and build it
> using Stable tools. Might not work, though, because the latest
> nvidia drivers are built with modern tool versions.
>
> I'd suggest moving up to Lenny/testin
Jimmy Wu wrote:
I followed the instructions to install the nvidia drivers the Debian
way from this site:
http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers
Just installed AMD64 Etch on a dual core 64, with a Leadtek Quadro FX540
on a work station.
Getting similar reactions with the basic nv driver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/24/08 18:58, Jimmy Wu wrote:
[snip]
>
> Now, on to a solution. The unstable nvidia-glx does support my card,
> but I want to run the stable distribution. I know there are ways to
> configure apt/aptitude/sources.lst to have a mixed system, but
On Jan 24, 2008 5:36 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so look like?
I haven't had a chance to check that yet (I put my laptop away and
it's charging now). However I think I've figured out the problem (see
below...)
On Jan 24, 2008 6:2
On Thu January 24 2008, Jimmy Wu wrote:
> Etch uses xorg.
> Actually, nv was what the installer picked by default and that didn't
> work for me (I was surprised by that, but maybe stable uses an older
> version of nv or something). Anyways, vesa worked, and it still does
> now, so that's what I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/24/08 16:18, Jimmy Wu wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 5:06 PM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I tried that, and got the black unresponsive screen again. I guess
>>> that rules out gdm?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>> Yes it does. Now in single
On Jan 24, 2008 5:06 PM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried that, and got the black unresponsive screen again. I guess
> > that rules out gdm?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> Yes it does. Now in single user mode run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
> (or xfree-x86?? I use unstable and I
Jimmy Wu wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008 4:46 PM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jimmy,
I have not yet looked over your files, but try to boot into single user
mode (grub screen, normaly the 2nd line) and as root, type "startx" and
see if it starts. This will rule in or out gdm.
On Jan 24, 2008 4:46 PM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jimmy,
>
> I have not yet looked over your files, but try to boot into single user
> mode (grub screen, normaly the 2nd line) and as root, type "startx" and
> see if it starts. This will rule in or out gdm.
I tried that, and g
Jimmy Wu wrote:
I followed the instructions to install the nvidia drivers the Debian
way from this site:
http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers
Every command worked fine, with no error messages. However, when it
came time to reboot, I get a black screen shortly after the message
that says
I followed the instructions to install the nvidia drivers the Debian
way from this site:
http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers
Every command worked fine, with no error messages. However, when it
came time to reboot, I get a black screen shortly after the message
that says gdm is starting.
On Jan 22, 2008 12:02 PM, Jimmy Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Updates on the situation
> I've shrunk Vista and left it as the first partition on the HD. After
> looking around, I think that my laptop does not have a recovery
> partition, which is rather strange. There is no Rescue and Recovery
Updates on the situation
I've shrunk Vista and left it as the first partition on the HD. After
looking around, I think that my laptop does not have a recovery
partition, which is rather strange. There is no Rescue and Recovery
ThinkVantage tool, or anything that says create recovery media at all.
On Jan 18, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Jimmy Wu wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 4:27 PM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
xfs sure does copy and delete really large files faster - I do use it
for video at home.
How big do files have to be before one starts to notice the advantages
of XFS?
In my exp
On Jan 18, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Jimmy Wu wrote:
(4) ReiserFS can be flaky on a system crash.
I haven't found it to be flaky on system crashes. I have found it to
be extremely unforgiving of disk corruption and IDE bus problems. I
was able to recover the data with reiserfsck, but it took a ve
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 05:32:25PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
> On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > > > (8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than ext3?
> >
> > no to either
> > /boot should not be a single partition by itself..
> > it is part of /bin, /lib
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:47:29 +0900
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ext3 is best if you are dealing with a mixture of both and has the
> added security factor of defaulting to Ext2 if it fails. Although I
> have never had reason to find out.
I'm in the habit of using buggy and crash-prone hardw
Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Wow, thanks for the many quick responses. I'm doing a "group reply"
to the list by quoting everyone in one message. Not sure if this is
top-posting, bottom-posting, or conversational-posting, but if this
goes against mailing list etiquette, please tell m
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Wow, thanks for the many quick responses. I'm doing a "group reply"
to the list by quoting everyone in one message. Not sure if this is
top-posting, bottom-posting, or conversational-posting, but if this
goes against mailing list etiquette, please tell me/flame me gently,
and I
Wow, thanks for the many quick responses. I'm doing a "group reply"
to the list by quoting everyone in one message. Not sure if this is
top-posting, bottom-posting, or conversational-posting, but if this
goes against mailing list etiquette, please tell me/flame me gently,
and I won't do it again.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 05:32:25PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
> On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > > > (8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than ext3?
> >
> > no to either
> > /boot should not be a single partition by itself..
> > it is part of /bin, /lib
On 2008-01-18T16:11:17-0500, Jimmy Wu wrote:
> (1) ext3 mounts and unmounts slowly, resulting in increased boot times.
I use ext3 on same hardware, and (clean) mounts do not take any
significant time:
[ 19.209034] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[ 19.209039] VFS: Mounted
Quoth Hugo Vanwoerkom:
>
> ext2. Never have used any other.
I seriously hope that this was a joke...
Aleks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoth Jimmy Wu:
> I've looked around on Google, and come up with a lot of frustratingly
> conflicting advice.
That's because file systems are Voodoo. Everyone wants to take part in the
discussion, without anyone really understanding what they're talking about.
> For example, an article from
>
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:32:25 -0500
Allan Wind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > > > (8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than
> > > > ext3?
> >
> > no to either
> > /boot should not be a single partition by itself..
> > it
On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > > (8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than ext3?
>
> no to either
> /boot should not be a single partition by itself..
> it is part of /bin, /lib, /sbin /etc ... which is the rootfs
>
> even if /boot is fin
hi ya
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Jimmy Wu wrote:
> > (1) ext3 mounts and unmounts slowly, resulting in increased boot times.
any journally fs will be "slower" than non-journaling fs ( ext2, dos, etc )
> > (2) Neither JFS nor XFS can be made smaller, although they can be
> > extended if neede
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to decide on which file systems to use for a Debian
install on a personal laptop. It's a Thinkpad T61 with one 160 GB HD.
I've looked around on Google, and come up with a lot of frustratingly
conflicting advice. For example, an article from
debian-administra
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to decide on which file systems to use for a Debian
install on a personal laptop. It's a Thinkpad T61 with one 160 GB HD.
Hello Jimmy,
I have found:
Xfs is best for large file sizes, if that's what you are dealing with -
graphics, and the ilk;
Reiserfs
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to decide on which file systems to use for a Debian
install on a personal laptop. It's a Thinkpad T61 with one 160 GB HD.
I've looked around on Google, and come up with a lot of frustratingly
conflicting advice. For example, an article from
debian-administra
Hello,
I am trying to decide on which file systems to use for a Debian
install on a personal laptop. It's a Thinkpad T61 with one 160 GB HD.
I've looked around on Google, and come up with a lot of frustratingly
conflicting advice. For example, an article from
debian-administration touts XFS as
David Brodbeck wrote:
> I remember when Intel started shipping processors with
unique ID
> numbers. There was much weeping and gnashing of teeth as
open-source
> proponents and privacy advocates declared that this would
lead to the
> end of civilization as we know it.
Yup, remember being
Mike Bird wrote:
On Mon January 14 2008 13:54:21 David wrote:
Sorry for butting in, but assuming this is the Lenovo T61, what do you
think of it?
It's one of a number I'm considering at the moment.
Did you get the pre-installed SUSE option or do you have Debian
installed, and if so, any con
On Mon January 14 2008 13:54:21 David wrote:
> > Lenny installer had no problem shrinking the Vista partition and
> > setting up grub dual boot - actually triple boot on the T61 if you
> > keep the diag partition (recommended).
>
> Sorry for butting in, but assuming this is the Lenovo T61, what do
On Jan 13, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Hal Finney wrote:
I am actively involved with
some open-source TPM projects and see this technology as having
tremendous potential. It pains me to see so much uninformed FUD being
cast about whenever the topic comes up.
We're a twitchy bunch, aren't we?
I remember
Mike Bird wrote:
Lenny installer had no problem shrinking the Vista partition and
setting up grub dual boot - actually triple boot on the T61 if you
keep the diag partition (recommended).
Sorry for butting in, but assuming this is the Lenovo T61, what do you
think of it?
It's one of a numb
On Jan 14, 2008 2:26 PM, Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon January 14 2008 03:47:32 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 04:51:21PM -0500, Jimmy Wu wrote:
> > > am not a big gamer. The only reason I would have Windows is because
> > > there might be unforeseeable circumst
On Mon January 14 2008 03:47:32 Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 04:51:21PM -0500, Jimmy Wu wrote:
> > am not a big gamer. The only reason I would have Windows is because
> > there might be unforeseeable circumstances when I may run into Windows
> > only software. I am sure if I n
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 04:51:21PM -0500, Jimmy Wu wrote:
> am not a big gamer. The only reason I would have Windows is because
> there might be unforeseeable circumstances when I may run into Windows
> only software. I am sure if I needed to, I could always shrink by
> Debian partition later and
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 08:23:30PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/13/08 19:42, David wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Here in the US, 99.5% of the people who regularly use the intarweb
> >> couldn't secure their computer with a map, both hands and a flashlight.
> >
> > They should get the Canadians to sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/08 19:42, David wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> Here in the US, 99.5% of the people who regularly use the intarweb
>> couldn't secure their computer with a map, both hands and a flashlight.
>
> They should get the Canadians to show them
Ron Johnson wrote:
Here in the US, 99.5% of the people who regularly use the intarweb
couldn't secure their computer with a map, both hands and a flashlight.
They should get the Canadians to show them what they don't know how.
Regards,
--
David Palmer
Linux User - #352034
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun January 13 2008 17:18:42 Ron Johnson wrote:
> Here in the US, 99.5% of the people who regularly use the intarweb
> couldn't secure their computer with a map, both hands and a flashlight.
How about with a Debian installation CD?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/08 17:07, David wrote:
> Hal Finney wrote:
[snip]
>
> There is no critique of open source formats here (I've been meaning to
> check back on the Open Bios project for a while), but I do endorse full
> control being in the hands of the enduser
> Jimmy Wu wrote:
>> I just got the ThinkPad T61 laptop today. I went in to system
>> properties to take a look at the hardware device manager and I noticed
>> it included "Trusted Platform Module 1.2". Now, this raised a red
>> flag for me, as my first impressions of "trusted computing" were
>> fr
Hal Finney wrote:
Jimmy Wu wrote:
I just got the ThinkPad T61 laptop today. I went in to system
properties to take a look at the hardware device manager and I noticed
it included "Trusted Platform Module 1.2". Now, this raised a red
flag for me, as my first impressions of "trusted computing" wer
Jimmy Wu wrote:
> I just got the ThinkPad T61 laptop today. I went in to system
> properties to take a look at the hardware device manager and I noticed
> it included "Trusted Platform Module 1.2". Now, this raised a red
> flag for me, as my first impressions of "trusted computing" were
> framed by
David wrote:
Scott Gifford wrote:
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jimmy Wu wrote:
[...]
(2) Does Debian support TPM chips? What is the community's take on
the issue?
My take is that TPM does have some security merits, but it also has a
lot of potential for abuse.
Google turned up these
On Saturday 12 January 2008 08:45 David wrote:
> I'm a member of Al Quaida
OMG, everybody RUN!
Yes that "missquote" was on purpose, please read the references before
arresting this person...(whoever it may concern...)
--
http://noneisyours.marcher.name
http://feeds.feedbur
Scott Gifford wrote:
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jimmy Wu wrote:
[...]
(2) Does Debian support TPM chips? What is the community's take on the issue?
My take is that TPM does have some security merits, but it also has a
lot of potential for abuse.
Google turned up these results of the
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jimmy Wu wrote:
[...]
>> (2) Does Debian support TPM chips? What is the community's take on the issue?
>> My take is that TPM does have some security merits, but it also has a
>> lot of potential for abuse.
>> Google turned up these results of the beginnings o
On Friday 11 January 2008 22:14, Jimmy Wu wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 12:31 PM, David Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 9, 2008, at 5:27 PM, Mike Bird wrote:
> > > You might want to make the recovery CDs and save the recovery
> > > partition.
> > > In this sad world, being able to restore
Jimmy Wu wrote:
I just got the ThinkPad T61 laptop today. I went in to system
properties to take a look at the hardware device manager and I noticed
it included "Trusted Platform Module 1.2". Now, this raised a red
flag for me, as my first impressions of "trusted computing" were
framed by thi
On Jan 10, 2008 12:31 PM, David Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 9, 2008, at 5:27 PM, Mike Bird wrote:
> > You might want to make the recovery CDs and save the recovery
> > partition.
> > In this sad world, being able to restore/reinstall Vista will
> > dramatically
> > improve resale
On Jan 9, 2008, at 5:27 PM, Mike Bird wrote:
On Wed January 9 2008 13:51:21 Jimmy Wu wrote:
The reasons I don't want Vista are as follows:
(1) Microsoft claims even the Home Basic needs "20 GB hard drive with
at least 15 GB of available space" (see
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/win
On Wed January 9 2008 13:51:21 Jimmy Wu wrote:
> The reasons I don't want Vista are as follows:
> (1) Microsoft claims even the Home Basic needs "20 GB hard drive with
> at least 15 GB of available space" (see
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/editions/systemrequi
>rements.ms
Thanks to Chris and Mike for your responses - I appreciate your input and time
On Jan 9, 2008 6:14 AM, Chris Lale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Perhaps it would be best to install with dual booting by shrinking your
> Windoze
> partition - have a look at the Debian NewbieDOC wiki [1].
and
Jimmy Wu wrote:
[...]
> I have a few questions before I wipe
> Vista off the laptop, specifically about the Thinkpad software that
> comes preloaded. Does Debian provide similar support for stuff like
> the "Client Security" that manages the fingerprint reader, and other
> stuff the volume button
On Tue January 8 2008 19:40:43 Jimmy Wu wrote:
> A question for Thinkpad Debian users:
>
> I will be getting a Lenovo Thinkpad T61 in a few days, which will
> become my primary computer for school/home etc. I want to run Debian
> etch on it, but am relatively new to Debian and Linux (I started wit
Hello to the Debian community,
A question for Thinkpad Debian users:
I will be getting a Lenovo Thinkpad T61 in a few days, which will
become my primary computer for school/home etc. I want to run Debian
etch on it, but am relatively new to Debian and Linux (I started with
Ubuntu about 7 months
"Chris Ochs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is the stable branch frozen in place except for security/bug fixes from the
> time it was released?
Yes.
> I installed woody and then upgraded to kernel 2.4.18, which made me
> think what other packages are update from time to time.
In the particular c
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:05:57PM -0800, Chris Ochs wrote:
>
> Is the stable branch frozen in place except for security/bug fixes from the
> time it was released? I installed woody and then upgraded to kernel 2.4.18,
> which made me think what other packages are update from time to time.
In ter
Is the stable branch frozen in place except for security/bug fixes from the
time it was released? I installed woody and then upgraded to kernel 2.4.18,
which made me think what other packages are update from time to time.
Also, I'm assuming that running woody is the best bet for mission critical
Message-
From: kapil khosla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 8:47 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: New user question
Hi ,
I have installed Debian on my system and now want to install windows.
While installing I made a separate 7 GB FAT32 Partition.
When
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 11:47:29AM -0500, kapil khosla wrote:
hi
> Hi ,
> I have installed Debian on my system and now want to install windows.
> While installing I made a separate 7 GB FAT32 Partition.
>
i don't clearly understand your problem. what i seem to knew was ,
u first installed Debia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 22 December 2001 4:47 pm, kapil khosla wrote:
> Hi ,
> I have installed Debian on my system and now want to install windows.
> While installing I made a separate 7 GB FAT32 Partition.
>
> When I put the windows bootable disk , Linux does no
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
> Hi ,
> I have installed Debian on my system and now want to install windows.
> While installing I made a separate 7 GB FAT32 Partition.
>
> When I put the windows bootable disk , Linux does not reckognize it. What
> shall I do ..thanks
> Kapil
>
I don't underst
Hi ,
I have installed Debian on my system and now want to install windows.
While installing I made a separate 7 GB FAT32 Partition.
When I put the windows bootable disk , Linux does not reckognize it. What
shall I do ..thanks
Kapil
88 matches
Mail list logo
