On Sunday 30 December 2001 04:44, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, csj wrote:
> > On Saturday 29 December 2001 06:59, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > > The funny thing about dillo is that people frequently say "...
> > > Dillo ... faster than Mozilla ..." But, it isn't true! I've
> > >
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, csj wrote:
> On Saturday 29 December 2001 06:59, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > The funny thing about dillo is that people frequently say "... Dillo
> > ... faster than Mozilla ..." But, it isn't true! I've observed
> > that, on my machine, Mozilla actually accesses and rende
On Saturday 29 December 2001 06:59, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> The funny thing about dillo is that people frequently say "... Dillo
> ... faster than Mozilla ..." But, it isn't true! I've observed
> that, on my machine, Mozilla actually accesses and renders every page
> I tried more quickly than D
I noticed that the new release of dillo has been packaged up for unstable.
It's a fun little browser, and it certainly does enough of the job so that
you can read many web pages. It even does a semi-reasonable job of
complicated sites like zeldman.com and w3.org. And, it does it all
with o
4 matches
Mail list logo
