Re: New modules.conf + sound...

1999-10-28 Thread Graham Ashton
I'm not on the debian list at the moment, but have just been searching the archives. I noticed your messages which looked like they would solve my (exact same) problem [potato + 2.2.13 + all updates]; -- In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >/lib/modules/2.2.10/misc/sound.o: invalid paramete

RE: Re: New modules.conf + sound...

1999-10-20 Thread Chris Mayes
--Original Message-- From: Lee Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: October 20, 1999 12:02:00 AM GMT Subject: Re: New modules.conf + sound... /* it seems the new version of modutils now tries to pass io=0x220 directly to sound.o (which it doesn't directly support) Try com

Re: New modules.conf + sound...

1999-10-20 Thread Lee Maguire
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >/lib/modules/2.2.10/misc/sound.o: invalid parameter parm_io >After a quick search, I have not yet found where sound.o is handed a parm_io >parameter (I could just be totally misinterpreting the error). the parm_io refers to the io=0x220 in your modules

New modules.conf + sound...

1999-10-19 Thread Chris Mayes
Hi. Well, after running another system upgrade a couplea days ago (on Potato, of course), I seem to have broken my sound configuration again. I am not sure if it was this upgrade or a previous one that shifted module configuration from conf.modules to modules.conf (or whatever they're called) but