Re: New HD advice

2004-08-14 Thread Johan Kullstam
Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > John Summerfield wrote: > > > Mike wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> David Baron wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks for all the good advice (obviously I am considering moving > >>> stuff to a new drive). A few more questions: > >>> > >>> 1. (Might be elementary, not matter, but )

Re: New HD advice

2004-08-14 Thread David Baron
On Friday 13 August 2004 18:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > With that said, if you have 2 disks, it's important to have them both > installed as IDE primaries, never having two disks on the same IDE > channel as primary and secondary.  The idea is that your system can > read/write to the two primar

Re: New HD advice

2004-08-14 Thread John Summerfield
Mike wrote: Although you can create swap space as a file, instead of the kernel handling a raw partition to swap, all swapping must go through the file system, which slows swapping considerably. Not so in 2.6. What do you mean by that? I will give you that the VMM is much better in 2.6. B

Re: New HD advice

2004-08-13 Thread Mike
John Summerfield wrote: Mike wrote: David Baron wrote: Thanks for all the good advice (obviously I am considering moving stuff to a new drive). A few more questions: 1. (Might be elementary, not matter, but ) what is best, place files on partition and mount to the target directory or directory

Re: New HD advice

2004-08-13 Thread John Summerfield
Mike wrote: David Baron wrote: Thanks for all the good advice (obviously I am considering moving stuff to a new drive). A few more questions: 1. (Might be elementary, not matter, but ) what is best, place files on partition and mount to the target directory or directory(ies!!) on the partition

Re: New HD advice

2004-08-13 Thread Mike
David Baron wrote: Thanks for all the good advice (obviously I am considering moving stuff to a new drive). A few more questions: 1. (Might be elementary, not matter, but ) what is best, place files on partition and mount to the target directory or directory(ies!!) on the partition and mount t

Re: New HD advice

2004-08-13 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:00:04PM +0300, David Baron wrote: > 1. (Might be elementary, not matter, but ) what is best, place files on > partition and mount to the target directory or directory(ies!!) on the > partition and mount to the parent directory? I have no idea what you're asking here.

Re: New HD advice

2004-08-13 Thread David Baron
Thanks for all the good advice (obviously I am considering moving stuff to a new drive). A few more questions: 1. (Might be elementary, not matter, but ) what is best, place files on partition and mount to the target directory or directory(ies!!) on the partition and mount to the parent directo

Re: New HD advice

2004-08-13 Thread John Summerfield
David Baron wrote: I have two disks in my system now: an older 8g with Windows 98 (still need it for my sound work, I'm afrad), and a newer 40g. This one has a 16g vfat32 for audio data, another for other windows data (has documents, also cygwin and a copy of the 6g of windows junk from the old

Re: New HD advice

2004-08-13 Thread John Summerfield
David Baron wrote: I have two disks in my system now: an older 8g with Windows 98 (still need it for my sound work, I'm afrad), and a newer 40g. This one has a 16g vfat32 for audio data, another for other windows data (has documents, also cygwin and a copy of the 6g of windows junk from the old

Re: New HD advice

2004-08-13 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:43:03AM +0300, David Baron wrote: > 1. What would be an sane, effective way of setting things up, i.e. > move /local, /var, others to their own places? You could do, but if the drive is faulty, or fails, that would really help having partitions on the drive. > 2. Is it

New HD advice

2004-08-13 Thread David Baron
I have two disks in my system now: an older 8g with Windows 98 (still need it for my sound work, I'm afrad), and a newer 40g. This one has a 16g vfat32 for audio data, another for other windows data (has documents, also cygwin and a copy of the 6g of windows junk from the old disk--maintained by