Re: Netstd reorganization

1999-12-05 Thread John Hasler
George Bonser writes: > But the dependancies need to change. I want rwho on one system but I do > NOT want rwhod on it. I want rsh but I do NOT want rshd. Separating the > clients from the daemons would be a good idea ... netstd-client and > netstd-server would be better. All those services used

Re: Netstd reorganization

1999-12-05 Thread Brad
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 11:53:45AM -0800, George Bonser wrote: > On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Brad wrote: > > > Whatever the netstd package now depends on is what used to be in netstd. > > But the dependancies need to change. I want rwho on one system but I do > NOT want rwhod on it. I want rsh but I do

Re: Netstd reorganization

1999-12-05 Thread Brad
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 02:31:04PM +, Randy Edwards wrote: >Can someone point me to some documentation or clue me into the netstd > reorganization? > >I understand that netstd was broken down into individual components, but > I sort of miss the old way, simply because

Netstd reorganization

1999-12-05 Thread Randy Edwards
Can someone point me to some documentation or clue me into the netstd reorganization? I understand that netstd was broken down into individual components, but I sort of miss the old way, simply because I never learned all of what was in netstd. When netstd asked if I wanted to disable the