On 23 Jan 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I doubt that the license will be compatible with the GPL. They will
> > almost certainly demand an unrestricted license on all changes, and
> > the talk of a "special site" makes me think that they will forbid
> > unauthorized distribution of
On Sat, 24 Jan 1998 14:42:57 +1059 (EST) Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> ideas aren't copyrightable.
>
> ideas on how (and how NOT) to do things can be re-used at will.
>
Not quite so. There is something called intelectual property, which may
encompass ideas
Jonathan
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS
I wrote:
> I doubt that the license will be compatible with the GPL. They will
> almost certainly demand an unrestricted license on all changes, and
> the talk of a "special site" makes me think that they will forbid
> unauthorized distribution of derivatives.
Craig Sanders writes:
> ideas aren't
On 22 Jan 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Craig Sanders writes:
> > possibly re-use parts of netscape browser in mnemonic. and
> > vice-versa.
>
> I doubt that the license will be compatible with the GPL. They will
> almost certainly demand an unrestricted license on all changes, and
> the talk o
On Sat, 24 Jan 1998, Joost Kooij wrote:
> On 24 Jan 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> > jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Worst still, linux netscape (and presumably other unix versions) keep
> > > resetting permissions on .netscape/bookmarks.html to 600, which means
> > > that I can't
On 24 Jan 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Worst still, linux netscape (and presumably other unix versions) keep
> > resetting permissions on .netscape/bookmarks.html to 600, which means
> > that I can't put symlink .netscape into ~/public_html and read my
>
jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Worst still, linux netscape (and presumably other unix versions) keep
> resetting permissions on .netscape/bookmarks.html to 600, which means
> that I can't put symlink .netscape into ~/public_html and read my
> bookmarks when I travel.
Does ln $HOME/.netscape/bo
Alexander Kushnirenko writes:
> Sorry I made a typo in previous messoge. Sending in again.
>
> > I am curious to find out what folks in the Debian community think of
> > this.
>
> > 2. What features would you add to the browser?
> >
> I'm running Netscape on different computers, and whou
Sudhakar Chandrasekharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am curious to find out what folks in the Debian community think of
| this.
|
| What are the changes that you would make to the source code to make
| the browser better?
|
| 2. What features would you add to the browser?
I'd like the abili
Sudhakar Chandrasekharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am curious to find out what folks in the Debian community think of
| this.
|
| 1. What are the changes that you would make to the source code to make
| the browser better?
|
| 2. What features would you add to the browser?
I don't current
Sorry I made a typo in previous messoge. Sending in again.
> I am curious to find out what folks in the Debian community think of
> this.
> 2. What features would you add to the browser?
>
I'm running Netscape on different computers, and whould be glad to keep
bookmark file just on ONE compute
> I am curious to find out what folks in the Debian community think of
> this.
> 2. What features would you add to the browser?
>
I'm running Netscape on different computers, and whould be glad to keep
bookmark file just on what computer, as sometimes it's difficult to syncronise
them. Sorry
5)366-6520 x4237
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
> From: Sudhakar Chandrasekharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Debian User
> Subject: Re: Netscape releasing source code for 5.0
> Date: Thursday, January 22, 1998 5:53 PM
>
> I am curious to find out what folk
Craig Sanders writes:
> possibly re-use parts of netscape browser in mnemonic. and vice-versa.
I doubt that the license will be compatible with the GPL. They will almost
certainly demand an unrestricted license on all changes, and the talk of a
"special site" makes me think that they will forbid
On Thu, 22 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> I am curious to find out what folks in the Debian community think of
> this.
>
> 1. What are the changes that you would make to the source code to make
> the browser better?
the big one is port it to use GTK rather than Motif. but start off b
I am curious to find out what folks in the Debian community think of
this.
1. What are the changes that you would make to the source code to make
the browser better?
2. What features would you add to the browser?
3. Would a UN*X developer add a feature that is unix specific. Or would
he / she a
"Jaakko Niemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> YES!
>
> Did I read that correctly (It's going to be put under GPL)?
>
> Now GTK - version!
Not GPL, GPL-like. very large difference!
--
Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion." -- me
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING
>> Netscape Inc. has decided to release source code for "free redistribution
>> and modification" for version 5.0, starting with the first beta later
>> this quarter.
YES!
Did I read that correctly (It's going to be put under GPL)?
Now GTK - version!
--j
--
TO UNSUBSCRI
Netscape Inc. has decided to release source code for "free redistribution
and modification" for version 5.0, starting with the first beta later
this quarter.
Check out:
http://www.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease558.html?cp=nws01flh1
Wi
19 matches
Mail list logo
