Thank you Kent!!!
It works perfectly.
Angel
Kent West wrote:
aparra wrote:
I have the debain 2.2 instaled, and i try tu use any of the new
versions from netscape, but I can use any plugins, neither the ones
preinstaled.
With "about:plugins" I get the correc
aparra wrote:
I have the debain 2.2 instaled, and i try tu use any of the new
versions from netscape, but I can use any plugins, neither the ones
preinstaled.
With "about:plugins" I get the correct directory
"/usr/local/netscape/plugins" but I Only get the libnull plugin and if
I make a manua
I have the debain 2.2 instaled, and i try tu use any of the new versions
from netscape, but I can use any plugins, neither the ones preinstaled.
With "about:plugins" I get the correct directory
"/usr/local/netscape/plugins" but I Only get the libnull plugin and if I
make a manual instalation of
Kelly Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have seen several people state that they have been able to make
>mozilla and netscape work on the same machine, but I was wondering if
>anyone has been able to get both versions of netscape (not mozilla) to
>work.
>
>The problem seems to me, that they b
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>I've dealt with a number of software packages which have an upgrade path
>but for which older versions may be required for various compatibility
>or interoperability reasons. Ultimately, mature products tend to go for
>configuration files of the form: "swpackage.versio
Well, I got it to work by running it as root in an eterm. I had never
run Netscape 6.0 as root, so its .netscape directory was never 'corrupted'.
This brings up another question: Has the XFree86 architecture changed
from 3.3.6-4.0.1 which allows a non-owner of a terminal to open up a
on Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 11:53:13AM -0600, Kelly Corbin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I have seen several people state that they have been able to make
> mozilla and netscape work on the same machine, but I was wondering if
> anyone has been able to get both versions of netscape (not mozilla) to
Kelly Corbin wrote:
>
> I have seen several people state that they have been able to make
> mozilla and netscape work on the same machine, but I was wondering if
as long as you install both they both work, there's nothing special
about it.
> anyone has been able to get both versions of netscap
I have seen several people state that they have been able to make
mozilla and netscape work on the same machine, but I was wondering if
anyone has been able to get both versions of netscape (not mozilla) to
work.
The problem seems to me, that they both want to access .netscape, but
they have
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 06:02:32AM -0800, Shel Johnson wrote:
>
> So y'all think the pure mozilla will have the same bugs as Netscape 6 or
many of the same bugs yes, probably/definitly fewer though since netscape 6 is
just an older snapshot of mozilla with extra bugs and crap slapped on
by AOL.
--- Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phillip Deackes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 22:40:05 +0100
> > Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > What about beonex? I installed it yesterday on a friends system and
> it
> > > seems to work good.
> >
> > What is
indoze one ;) ), maybe
another proxy software has https support.
Thanks, Kind Regards,
Stephan Hachinger
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas J. Hamman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephan Hachinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 11:44 AM
Phillip Deackes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 22:40:05 +0100
> Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What about beonex? I installed it yesterday on a friends system and it
> > seems to work good.
>
> What is beonex? I just did a search on Google and Freshmeat and found
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 22:40:05 +0100
Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about beonex? I installed it yesterday on a friends system and it
> seems to work good.
What is beonex? I just did a search on Google and Freshmeat and found nothing.
--
Phillip Deackes
Using Storm Linux 2000
> - NS 4.57: still primary for graphics, though I curse it every time I
s/4.57/4.75/
Bah!
--
Karsten M. Self http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc. http://www.zelerate.org
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 04:20:53AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 01:57:39PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > My experience was that Mozilla M18 was not nearly as stable as
> > Netscape 4.75 and I removed it from my system.
>
> i have found its certainly more of a pig, and i
On Saturday 18 November 2000 20:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> |> i heared of skipstone and really really want to try it. but
> |> unfortunatly there is only a woody version :( is there any way to get
> |> skipstone for a potato system?
>
> I have Skipstone running fine on my potato system, and I r
|> i heared of skipstone and really really want to try it. but
|> unfortunatly there is only a woody version :( is there any way to get
|> skipstone for a potato system?
I have Skipstone running fine on my potato system, and I really like
it.
I installed Mozilla from Debian (M18-3 in stable), an
riginal Message -
From: "Thomas J. Hamman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian help"
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 2:26 AM
Subject: Re: Netscape 6.0/konqueor
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 10:37:13AM -0500, Anderson, Tim TL33E wrote:
> > On my box konqueror h
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 10:37:13AM -0500, Anderson, Tim TL33E wrote:
> On my box konqueror has been a breath of fresh air.. with the exception of
> https support, which isn't there. Anyone know if that's a KDE thing or is
> it just not compiled into the packages at kde.tdyc.com?
I don't kno
I think it's a kdelibs thing--have you tried kdelibs3-crypto?
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Anderson, Tim TL33E wrote:
> On my box konqueror has been a breath of fresh air.. with the exception of
> https support, which isn't there. Anyone know if that's a KDE thing or is
> it just not compiled int
on Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 04:14:40PM +, Ekkehard Kraemer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Daniel Borgmann wrote:
> >
> > > > My experience was that Mozilla M18 was not nearly as stable as
> > > > Netscape 4.75 and I removed it from my system.
> > >
> > > i have found its certainly more of a pig
> >
> > i heared of skipstone and really really want to try it.
>
> I just installed Skipstone, and it looks good (suits me better than
> Galeon, at least). Apart from being leaner than Mozilla/Netscape (small
> wonder, it aims to do much less), it has the one single feature which
> made me pay for the
On my box konqueror has been a breath of fresh air.. with the exception of
https support, which isn't there. Anyone know if that's a KDE thing or is
it just not compiled into the packages at kde.tdyc.com?
tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Borgmann [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>g
Daniel Borgmann wrote:
>
> > > My experience was that Mozilla M18 was not nearly as stable as
> > > Netscape 4.75 and I removed it from my system.
> >
> > i have found its certainly more of a pig
>
...
> i heared of skipstone and really really want to try it.
I just installed Skipstone, and it l
At Fri, 17 Nov 2000 14:44:05 +0100 , Daniel Borgmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > My experience was that Mozilla M18 was not nearly as stable as
>> > Netscape 4.75 and I removed it from my system.
>>
>> i have found its certainly more of a pig, and its interface is very
>> sluggish, it does te
> > My experience was that Mozilla M18 was not nearly as stable as
> > Netscape 4.75 and I removed it from my system.
>
> i have found its certainly more of a pig, and its interface is very
> sluggish, it does tend to be less stable too, but only for certain
> sites. i think for most people sticki
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 01:57:39PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 11:13:05PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> > yes, remove netscape 6 and run:
> >
> > apt-get update
> > apt-get install mozilla
> >
> > mozilla is much better then netscape 6 which is just an older mozilla
> >
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 11:13:05PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> yes, remove netscape 6 and run:
>
> apt-get update
> apt-get install mozilla
>
> mozilla is much better then netscape 6 which is just an older mozilla
> snapshot with lots of AOL crap layered on top. however mozilla is
My experie
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 11:29:15PM -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've installed Netscape 6.0 for a friend of mine. It looks pretty
> cool, finally the user can change displayed font size without going to
> preferences... The ugly HTML forms' elements are
Arcady Genkin wrote :
> 2. In the mail reader the new messages are not bolded. The Inbox
> word is bolded and shows 4 new messages, but in the mailbox summary
> panel there is no indication as to what messages are unread.
Did you change themes ? The themes page links to a release note page
tha
Greetings,
I've installed Netscape 6.0 for a friend of mine. It looks pretty
cool, finally the user can change displayed font size without going to
preferences... The ugly HTML forms' elements are gone, too. However
the product seems to be too slow; it looks like a lot of debuggin
32 matches
Mail list logo
