In short, nope. I'm on the plugin development team which is
separate from the development team for Nagios itself. I've actually not
had any look at the nagios-mysql or -postgresql tables and whether or
not they were indexed or optomized. I can only speculate it was not
given a high priority
I chose nagios-mysql.
Do you know why no tables have indexes?
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well being on the Nagios plugin development team, which was
formerly the netsaint plugin development team, I can that there is no
work being done on the Netsaint product and all development and
advancement is in Nagios. For the most part the plugins are
interchangable as I don't recal
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 10:14, Jacob Friis Larsen wrote:
> I see there are both Nagios and Netsaint packages.
> Which one should I use, or can I use both on the same server?
> Is it possible to use Netsaint plugins with Nagios?
Nagios is the "new" name of what once was NetSain
I see there are both Nagios and Netsaint packages.
Which one should I use, or can I use both on the same server?
Is it possible to use Netsaint plugins with Nagios?
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unfortunately that didnt work. Thanks anyway.
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 18:42, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 16:50, Paul William wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I installed netsaint but when I access it throught my browser I get the
> > following error message:
>
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 16:50, Paul William wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed netsaint but when I access it throught my browser I get the
> following error message:
>
> Forbidden
> You don't have permission to access /netsaint/ on this server.
>
> I am using woody
Hi,
I installed netsaint but when I access it throught my browser I get the
following error message:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /netsaint/ on this server.
I am using woody and my web server is apache. The netsaint deb made the
needed changes to my httpd.conf.
How do I a
, 2003 at 12:14:45PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Matthew Daubenspeck said on Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:31:57PM -0500:
> > I am in the process of building a dedicated Netsaint/Nagios box to host
> > a slew of client/server stats.
> >
> > What exactly should I use? I h
At 2003-04-02T18:31:57Z, Matthew Daubenspeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Netsaint or Nagios?
Since Nagios is a newer and renamed version of Netsaint (there were
trademark issues), you'll want to go with it.
--
Kirk Strauser
In Googlis non est, ergo non est.
pgp0.pgp
De
Matthew Daubenspeck said on Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:31:57PM -0500:
> I am in the process of building a dedicated Netsaint/Nagios box to host
> a slew of client/server stats.
>
> What exactly should I use? I have no problems running unstable if I have
> to, but what do I need to in
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
> I am in the process of building a dedicated Netsaint/Nagios box to host
> a slew of client/server stats.
>
> What exactly should I use? I have no problems running unstable if I have
> to, but what do I need to install? Netsaint or
I am in the process of building a dedicated Netsaint/Nagios box to host
a slew of client/server stats.
What exactly should I use? I have no problems running unstable if I have
to, but what do I need to install? Netsaint or Nagios?
TIA.
--
:wq!
Matthew Daubenspeck
http://www.oddprocess.org
Matthias Hentges wrote:
Am Mon, 2002-12-23 um 04.54 schrieb Ken McCord:
The older "netsaint" is just an alias to some folder on your HD which is
not inside the apache document-root.
Try http://localhost/netsaint/ instead.
^
Not Found
The req
Am Mon, 2002-12-23 um 04.54 schrieb Ken McCord:
> Trying to set up NetSaint on a freshly installed box running Debian 3.0.
> After getting the base system, X Windows and Mozilla loaded, I
> installed Apache and NetSaint. During the NetSaint install, I had the
> package automatical
Trying to set up NetSaint on a freshly installed box running Debian 3.0.
After getting the base system, X Windows and Mozilla loaded, I
installed Apache and NetSaint. During the NetSaint install, I had the
package automatically configure Apahce, add the netsaintadmin user and
enable NetSaint
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You need to run deborphan -a, since it, by default, only lists
>libraries. Another option is to install things using aptitude. It
>remember when a package (like aolserver here) is only installed to
>satisfy a
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 01:07:42AM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i installed and afterwards purged netsaint/unstable. However, it
> didn't want to go cleanly :-) A lot of files related to this package
> remain on the system. For instance there's a aols
- Original Message -
From: "Benedict Verheyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 1:07 AM
Subject: unclean netsaint removal
> Hi,
>
> i installed and afterwards purged netsaint/unstable. Howe
Hi,
i installed and afterwards purged netsaint/unstable. However, it didn't
want to go cleanly :-) A lot of files related to this package remain
on the system. For instance there's a aolserver thingie that gets installed
and that is still on the system, symlinks to this aolserver are s
Hi,
I use Netsaint, and I don't think there's an option to truncate the log file
("Log File" menu at the main menu). How am I supposed to deal with this
growing log? Would it be safe just by setting up logrotate for Netsaint?
Thanks in advance,
Oki
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 02:03:04PM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> It's a symlink problem. /usr/lib/cgi-bin/netsaint is a symlink to
> /usr/lib/netsaint/cgi-bin, and apache doesn't like that.
>
> You should
> a) remove the symlink
> b) move the actual directory to
|> > I'm trying to get netsaint running. I've got:
|> >
|> > 1. a standard apache install from the latest binary (unstable) deb.
|> >
|> > 2. a netsaint install from the latest netsaint binary (unstable) debs,
|> > including netsaint-plugins and ne
-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: apache: no permission to access netsaint cgi's?
I'm trying to get netsaint running. I've got:
1. a standard apache install from the latest binary (unstable) deb.
2. a netsaint install from the latest netsaint binary (unstable) debs,
including netsaint-
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 04:21:47PM -0600, Lance Simmons wrote:
> I'm trying to get netsaint running. I've got:
>
> 1. a standard apache install from the latest binary (unstable) deb.
>
> 2. a netsaint install from the latest netsaint binary (unstable) debs,
> in
I'm trying to get netsaint running. I've got:
1. a standard apache install from the latest binary (unstable) deb.
2. a netsaint install from the latest netsaint binary (unstable) debs,
including netsaint-plugins and netsaint-plugins-extra.
I didn't make changes to these i
Andy Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'd like to install netsaint on a potato box. Unfortunately, the most
>recent version requires glibc 2.2. Is is reasonably possible to
>upgrade potato to glibc 2.2? This is a production box, (mainly DNS,
>but it does one or two ot
Pending further investigation, we now allege that Andy Bastien wrote:
>
> I'd like to install netsaint on a potato box. Unfortunately, the most
> recent version requires glibc 2.2. Is is reasonably possible to
> upgrade potato to glibc 2.2? This is a production box, (mainly D
I am successfully running then latest version of netsaint on several
standard potato boxes without a hitch. The compile and installation works
perfectly.
Joel Dudley
Unix System Administrator
DevelopOnline.com
"For the scientist who has lived by his
I'd like to install netsaint on a potato box. Unfortunately, the most
recent version requires glibc 2.2. Is is reasonably possible to
upgrade potato to glibc 2.2? This is a production box, (mainly DNS,
but it does one or two other things as well), so I can't screw it up
;-). Should
30 matches
Mail list logo
