Re: NFSv4 without Kerberos and permissions

2017-10-24 Thread John Ratliff
On 10/19/2017 8:31 PM, John Ratliff wrote: On 10/16/2017 3:35 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: On 10/16/2017 07:57 PM, John Ratliff wrote: On 10/15/2017 3:38 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: Furthermore, the MANAGED_GIDS setting is only for NFSv2/3 and only for supplementary groups, not the primary grou

Re: NFSv4 without Kerberos and permissions

2017-10-19 Thread John Ratliff
On 10/16/2017 3:35 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: On 10/16/2017 07:57 PM, John Ratliff wrote: On 10/15/2017 3:38 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: Furthermore, the MANAGED_GIDS setting is only for NFSv2/3 and only for supplementary groups, not the primary group. It is not a security setting, it really i

Re: NFSv4 without Kerberos and permissions

2017-10-16 Thread Christian Seiler
On 10/16/2017 07:57 PM, John Ratliff wrote: > On 10/15/2017 3:38 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: >> Furthermore, the MANAGED_GIDS setting is only for NFSv2/3 and only >> for supplementary groups, not the primary group. It is not a security >> setting, it really is just for bypassing the 16 group limit

Re: NFSv4 without Kerberos and permissions

2017-10-16 Thread John Ratliff
On 10/15/2017 3:38 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: On 10/15/2017 03:55 AM, John Ratliff wrote: In my case, the user on the client I was testing was UID 1003, which on the server he was UID 1000. So they both had the group, but UID 1003 on the server did not have the group, because that user did not

Re: NFSv4 without Kerberos and permissions

2017-10-15 Thread Christian Seiler
On 10/15/2017 03:55 AM, John Ratliff wrote: > In my case, the user on the client I was testing was UID 1003, which > on the server he was UID 1000. So they both had the group, but UID > 1003 on the server did not have the group, because that user did not > exist. Therefore, permission denied. Then

Re: NFSv4 without Kerberos and permissions

2017-10-14 Thread John Ratliff
On 10/14/2017 3:39 PM, Elena evlt wrote: perhaps value defaults of nfs in ubuntu and debian are different  and perhaps nfs versions are different and any of these paremeters aren't recognized in the host client. 2017-10-14 21:28 GMT+02:00 John Ratliff >: I rec

Re: NFSv4 without Kerberos and permissions

2017-10-14 Thread Elena evlt
perhaps value defaults of nfs in ubuntu and debian are different and perhaps nfs versions are different and any of these paremeters aren't recognized in the host client. 2017-10-14 21:28 GMT+02:00 John Ratliff : > I recently set up an NFS v4 server on debian stretch. If I use a debian > client t

NFSv4 without Kerberos and permissions

2017-10-14 Thread John Ratliff
I recently set up an NFS v4 server on debian stretch. If I use a debian client to mount the share, everything works fine. However, if I use a CentOS or a Ubuntu client, the permissions don't work. I have synchronized the group ids manually, and that's the only permissions I'm interested in.