Rock:
Hi,
I'm trying to bring up the Debian 10 root file system on an ARM SoC
board. When the rootfs was in an SD card the board worked well. When I
put the rootfs on an NFS server and tried to boot the board through NFS
mount, it reported error through serial port:
|[FAILED] Failed to
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 04:20:36PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:58:30PM -0400, Lie Rock wrote:
> > So how is the process "create system users" performed when Linux/Debian
> > starts? What can be contributing to this error?
>
> unicorn:~$ grep -ri 'create system users' /
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:58:30PM -0400, Lie Rock wrote:
> So how is the process "create system users" performed when Linux/Debian
> starts? What can be contributing to this error?
unicorn:~$ grep -ri 'create system users' /lib/systemd
/lib/systemd/system/systemd-sysusers.service:Description=Crea
Hi,
I'm trying to bring up the Debian 10 root file system on an ARM SoC board.
When the rootfs was in an SD card the board worked well. When I put the
rootfs on an NFS server and tried to boot the board through NFS mount, it
reported error through serial port:
[FAILED] Failed to start C
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 07:46:31PM +0200, Reiner Buehl wrote:
> I think I found a solution! For whatever reason, my network interface
> enp5s11 was not in the "auto" line in /etc/network/interfaces. After adding
> it there and a reboot, the filesystem is mounted correct without any of
> the x-syst
I think I found a solution! For whatever reason, my network interface
enp5s11 was not in the "auto" line in /etc/network/interfaces. After adding
it there and a reboot, the filesystem is mounted correct without any of
the x-systemd mount options.
Am Fr., 2. Juli 2021 um 19:30 Uhr schrieb Reiner B
Hello,
this is the full unit:
# /etc/systemd/system/vdr.service
[Unit]
Description=Video Disk Recorder
Wants=systemd-udev-settle.service
After=systemd-udev-settle.service
[Service]
Type=notify
ExecStartPre=/bin/sh /usr/lib/vdr/merge-commands.sh "commands"
ExecStartPre=/bin/sh /usr/lib/vdr/merge
Hi.
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 06:12:58PM +0200, Reiner Buehl wrote:
> I have a directory that is mounted via NFS from a remote server.
Actually, you have an autofs mountpoint, because you set
x-systemd.automount option in fstab.
Only if something starts using that mountpoint an NFS filesyst
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 06:12:58PM +0200, Reiner Buehl wrote:
> I have a directory that is mounted via NFS from a remote server. The mount
> is done via an /etc/fstab entry like this:
>
> 192.168.1.2:/video /video nfs
> defaults,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.requires=network-online.target,x-
Hi all,
I have a directory that is mounted via NFS from a remote server. The mount
is done via an /etc/fstab entry like this:
192.168.1.2:/video /video nfs
defaults,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.requires=network-online.target,x-systemd.device-timeout=10,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,soft,nolock,noa
On 20120703_025628, Mark Panen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do not always have all my machines powered on and when i power up
> my main Squeeze machine, the boot sequence waits forever to mount the
> NFS mount points because machine 2 is powered down for example.
>
> I put "def
Mark Panen wrote:
> I do not always have all my machines powered on and when i power up
> my main Squeeze machine, the boot sequence waits forever to mount
> the NFS mount points because machine 2 is powered down for example.
Does the client machine *need* the server in order to operat
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Mark Panen wrote:
>
> I do not always have all my machines powered on and when i power up my main
> Squeeze machine, the boot sequence waits forever to mount the NFS mount
> points because machine 2 is powered down for example.
>
> I put "def
Mark Panen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I do not always have all my machines powered on and when i power up my
>main Squeeze machine, the boot sequence waits forever to mount the NFS
>mount points because machine 2 is powered down for example.
>
>I put "defaults" in my /e
Hi,
I do not always have all my machines powered on and when i power up my
main Squeeze machine, the boot sequence waits forever to mount the NFS
mount points because machine 2 is powered down for example.
I put "defaults" in my /etc/fstab in the NFS line.
Is there a better en
t-side, I'm not sure, but if NFS is/acts/behaves similar than
> samba does, you should be able to define NFS mount point options under "/
> etc/fstab".
Client-side, you can create an alias
alias mountnfs='mount.nfs -o ...'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-
en=255,hard,nointr,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountproto=udp
>
> how can i change some of the above without having to use the "-o" option
> to the mount command?
>From client-side, I'm not sure, but if NFS is/acts/behaves similar than
samba does, you should be ab
hello,
i did install nfs-common portmap, and nfs client works:
below are the options i see take effect per /proc/mounts if i say
"mount -t nfs blah:/fs /tmp/somedir"
rw,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,namlen=255,hard,nointr,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountproto=udp
how can i change s
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-09 16:16, Alexander Samad wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Ron Johnson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2010-03-08 08:40, Frank Bonnet wrote:
[snip]
like the following
eth0 <--OTHER TRAFFIC> LAN
eth1 <--
On 2010-03-09 16:16, Alexander Samad wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-08 08:40, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I have a Lenny server with two ethernet interfaces which is NFS CLIENT to
a NETAPP filer
I wonder if it would be possible to force NFS traffic to/fro
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-08 08:40, Frank Bonnet wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I have a Lenny server with two ethernet interfaces which is NFS CLIENT to
>> a NETAPP filer
>>
>> I wonder if it would be possible to force NFS traffic to/from the filer on
>> one ether
On 2010-03-08 08:40, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I have a Lenny server with two ethernet interfaces which is NFS CLIENT
to a NETAPP filer
I wonder if it would be possible to force NFS traffic to/from the filer
on one ethernet interface and use the other interface for all other
traffics ?
li
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a Lenny server with two ethernet interfaces which is NFS CLIENT to a
> NETAPP filer
>
> I wonder if it would be possible to force NFS traffic to/from the filer on
> one ethernet interface and use the other interface for all oth
Hello
I have a Lenny server with two ethernet interfaces which is NFS CLIENT
to a NETAPP filer
I wonder if it would be possible to force NFS traffic to/from the filer
on one ethernet interface and use the other interface for all other
traffics ?
like the following
eth0 <--OTHER TRAFFI
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 06:33 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally managed to fix all the nfs ports:
> http://www.lowth.com/LinWiz/1.09/notes/nfs_help.php?popup=1
>
> But using nfs with the firehol firewall up still does not work.
>
> The mount hangs.
>
> Anybody knows how to figure
Hi,
I finally managed to fix all the nfs ports:
http://www.lowth.com/LinWiz/1.09/notes/nfs_help.php?popup=1
But using nfs with the firehol firewall up still does not work.
The mount hangs.
Anybody knows how to figure out *why* the mount hangs?
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I encounter a problem with nfs : I can t mount a share /partage from the nfs server to its clients the message is the following (translated from French) mount: RPC: Unable to receive; errno = Connection refused But when I reload nfs-kernel-server it works two seconds but if I wait an
Freundliche Gruesse
Erwin Strobl
T-Systems Enterprise Services GmbH
Computing Services & Solutions (CSS)
Strobl Erwin
Mainframe Systems OS & Subsysteme II ( MSY-OS-S )
Dachauerstr 651, D- 80995 Muenchen
Tel. +49 (89) 1011-3324
Fax. +49 (89) 1011-7915
Mobil+49-171/42 39 886
E-Mai
I have set up an NFS
mount point using this as a reference. http://www.netapp.com/library/tr/3183.pdf The
server running nfs-kernel-server has sarge (upgraded from woody) and a 2.6
kernel. My problem is that after a couple of days the server stops responding
completely. No ssh, no ping, no
g the module in /etc/modules so it loads on boot.
> >
> > Could also try compiling support in the kernel if this doesn't work.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I'm using nfs-kernel-server, and I have the relevent nfs kernel stuff
> statically linked... :(
>
> I'm m
l-server, and I have the relevent nfs kernel stuff
statically linked... :(
I'm mounting exports from a Tru64 alpha to Debian sarge on a Dell 2800,
BTW. I forgot to try making the first nfs mount a different OS at work
today, and I don't want to reboot from home (Murphy's
I have an fstab, which after the usual local disk entries has nfs
entries that look like:
aservername:/s /s nfs rw,bg,intr,proto=tcp 0 0
aservername:/alum /alum nfs rw,bg,intr,proto=tcp 0 0
aservername:/users /users nfs rw,bg,intr,proto=tcp 0 0
aservername:/u2/u2nfs rw,bg,intr,p
I have an fstab, which after the usual local disk entries has nfs
entries that look like:
aservername:/s /s nfs rw,bg,intr,proto=tcp 0 0
aservername:/alum /alum nfs rw,bg,intr,proto=tcp 0 0
aservername:/users /users nfs rw,bg,intr,proto=tcp 0 0
aservername:/u2/u2nfs rw,bg,intr,pr
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:52:53PM +0300, Micha Feigin said
> Bottom line, is it possible to mount /etc through nfs and the override
> some of the files with local ones without resorting to playing around
> with links?
Yes, use bind mounts to mount dirs and files from the local disk into
/etc/.
e
> of the _files_ with local ones. You can override some of the directories
> by mounting something else after the original mount (at least, I think you
> can), but there's no way to override files.
>
> If /etc/ has to be unique to each computer, why are you nfs mounting it at
u
can), but there's no way to override files.
If /etc/ has to be unique to each computer, why are you nfs mounting it at
all? Why not just nfs mount /usr, /home, ... and leave /etc as local?
Justin Guerin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a difficult problem of setting up and maintaining mostly
identical linux installations on several machines which are sitting on
a local switch which is also the gateway to the outside world.
The problem is that they are not the same hardware, there needs to be a
server (although it should s
James Sinnamon wrote:
Dear list subscribers,
For the record, the problem is now fixed and nfs works very well.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:25 pm, James Sinnamon wrote:
At first I thought my command:
mount -t nfs 192.168.0.6:/etc /mnt/nfs
... had failed. It seemed to have hanged. I tried to kill
Dear list subscribers,
For the record, the problem is now fixed and nfs works very well.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:25 pm, James Sinnamon wrote:
> At first I thought my command:
>
> mount -t nfs 192.168.0.6:/etc /mnt/nfs
>
> ... had failed. It seemed to have hanged. I tried to kill it with
> C
Dear John et al,
(Firstly, sorry about the previous double posting. At first I posted
using a different e-mail address to that under which I had been
subscribed, so I resent it using the correct address.)
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:53 pm, John Summerfield wrote:
> James Sinnamon wrote:
> >Dear Paul
James Sinnamon wrote:
Dear Paulo et al,
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:12 am, Paulo Silva wrote:
A Sex, 2004-06-25 às 12:25, James Sinnamon escreveu:
Dear list subscribers,
At first I thought my command:
mount -t nfs 192.168.0.6:/etc /mnt/nfs
... had failed. It seemed to have hanged. I tried to
Dear Paulo et al,
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:12 am, Paulo Silva wrote:
> A Sex, 2004-06-25 às 12:25, James Sinnamon escreveu:
> > Dear list subscribers,
> >
> > At first I thought my command:
> >
> > mount -t nfs 192.168.0.6:/etc /mnt/nfs
> >
> > ... had failed. It seemed to have hanged. I tried t
Dear Paulo et al,
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:12 am, Paulo Silva wrote:
> A Sex, 2004-06-25 às 12:25, James Sinnamon escreveu:
> > Dear list subscribers,
> >
> > At first I thought my command:
> >
> > mount -t nfs 192.168.0.6:/etc /mnt/nfs
> >
> > ... had failed. It seemed to have hanged. I tried t
A Sex, 2004-06-25 às 12:25, James Sinnamon escreveu:
> Dear list subscribers,
>
> At first I thought my command:
>
> mount -t nfs 192.168.0.6:/etc /mnt/nfs
>
> ... had failed. It seemed to have hanged. I tried to kill it with
> Ctrl^C, then with 'kill -SIGKILL ', killing the Konsole tabbed
pecial, and AFAIK it is required. I
(version 2.4.25-1) had a version number greater than 2.4. the
nfs_common script doesn not start rpc.lockd.
So do I need to enable the kernel's lockd capability or is something
else cause the nfs mount to be slow?
I will try running rpc.mount and nfs.moun
but I will need write access also.
lockd not the problem?
I installed the package, nfs_common, which contains rpc.lockd, only to
to find out that rpc.lockd was NOT necessary because my kernel
(version 2.4.25-1) had a version number greater than 2.4. the
nfs_common
James Sinnamon wrote:
Dear list subscribers,
At first I thought my command:
mount -t nfs 192.168.0.6:/etc /mnt/nfs
... had failed. It seemed to have hanged. I tried to kill it with
Ctrl^C, then with 'kill -SIGKILL ', killing the Konsole tabbed
terminal ... but with no luck.
The process just
Dear list subscribers,
At first I thought my command:
mount -t nfs 192.168.0.6:/etc /mnt/nfs
... had failed. It seemed to have hanged. I tried to kill it with
Ctrl^C, then with 'kill -SIGKILL ', killing the Konsole tabbed
terminal ... but with no luck.
The process just would not die.
Ev
Em Ter, 2004-01-06 Ãs 20:39, Michael D Schleif escreveu:
> Is there some trick to mounting Netware shares via NFS?
No, you have to use NCP instead.
--
Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corcete Dutra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Prefeitura do MunicÃpio de SÃo Paulo
Governo EletrÃnico, Telecentros
Is there some trick to mounting Netware shares via NFS?
Yes, I can get them mounted; but, the uid/gid is like nobody under AIX,
largest signed 32 bit number, and file access is extremely limited under
these circumstances.
# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted
hi ya alexander
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Alexander B. Cheng wrote:
> I'm getting permission deny by server when I try to mount NFS on a
> client machine.
>
> my /etc/exports is
>
> /home/kingsmen 192.168.10.0/24(rw)
>
> my /etc/hosts.allow is
>
> ALL:192.168.10.10
explicity define only what you
I'm getting permission deny by server when I try to mount NFS on a
client machine.
my /etc/exports is
/home/kingsmen 192.168.10.0/24(rw)
my /etc/hosts.allow is
ALL:192.168.10.10
and my /etc/hosts.deny is
portmap:ALL
the server is using kernel 2.2.20 stable and I'm at a lost on why it's
not
Wondering if anyone can explain sort of odd behavoir I noted tonight on
an nfs share.
The setup: I have mounted an exported nfs share from my server onto my
/home directory on my workstation (mount -t nfs nfs:/home /home). On the
server machine (nfs), /home is exported with root_squash, so I would
John Spray wrote:
arjen wrote:
I do some mounts from an nfs server, and I get a few mount options
that I did not specify myself:
huis:/files/samba on /home/samba type nfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
To get rid of bits that you didn't specify, you have to specify
something contradictory. This
arjen wrote:
I do some mounts from an nfs server, and I get a few mount options
that I did not specify myself:
huis:/files/samba on /home/samba type nfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
To get rid of bits that you didn't specify, you have to specify
something contradictory. This will be done either i
Hi,
I do some mounts from an nfs server, and I get a few mount options that
I did not specify myself:
huis:/files/samba on /home/samba type nfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
How can I change these settings? I would like to remove the noexec bit
for example.
Thank you,
Arjen.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 15:18, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:05:30AM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> > Shri Shrikumar said on Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:00:25PM +0100:
> > > I need different umasks for different nfs mounts and the mount page does
> > > not give any help since nfs doesnt
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:45:59 +0100, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 15:05, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
>> The umask is a per-process setting, not a per mount setting.
>>
>> What are you trying to accomplish?
>
> I have the following directory structure
>
> ~/
> src/
> shared/
>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:05:30AM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Shri Shrikumar said on Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:00:25PM +0100:
> > I need different umasks for different nfs mounts and the mount page does
> > not give any help since nfs doesnt seem to have the umask option.
> >
> > Any ideas on wha
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 15:05, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> The umask is a per-process setting, not a per mount setting.
>
> What are you trying to accomplish?
I have the following directory structure
~/
src/
shared/
What happens now is that wherever I create a file, its created with
-rw-rw
Shri Shrikumar said on Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:00:25PM +0100:
> Hi,
>
> I need different umasks for different nfs mounts and the mount page does
> not give any help since nfs doesnt seem to have the umask option.
>
> Any ideas on what I could do to acheive this ? BTW, I am running testing
> / uns
Hi,
I need different umasks for different nfs mounts and the mount page does
not give any help since nfs doesnt seem to have the umask option.
Any ideas on what I could do to acheive this ? BTW, I am running testing
/ unstable.
Best wishes,
Shri
--
-
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:55, nori heikkinen wrote:
> trying to mount nfs partitions. they eventually work, but they take
> 46 minutes, and give errors like:
>
> lock_d up: no pid, 2 users??
>
> in the process. which is weird as shit.
>
> i was using kernel 2.4.21; i downgraded to 2.4.20, think
on Fri, 08 Aug 2003 02:43:37PM -0400, Greg Folkert insinuated:
> On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:55, nori heikkinen wrote:
> > trying to mount nfs partitions. they eventually work, but they
> > take 46 minutes, and give errors like:
> >
> > lock_d up: no pid, 2 users??
> >
> > in the process. which is
trying to mount nfs partitions. they eventually work, but they take
46 minutes, and give errors like:
lock_d up: no pid, 2 users??
in the process. which is weird as shit.
i was using kernel 2.4.21; i downgraded to 2.4.20, thinking it was
maybe a kernel bug, but no luck -- same problem.
i have
on Fri, 08 Aug 2003 12:22:58PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte insinuated:
> nori heikkinen said on Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:58:54PM -0400:
> > > If not, then I am guessing I need more info.
> >
> > what more info can i provide that would help?
> >
> > thanks,
>
> Have you checked your /etc/hosts.allow and
nori heikkinen said on Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:58:54PM -0400:
> > If not, then I am guessing I need more info.
>
> what more info can i provide that would help?
>
> thanks,
Have you checked your /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny? portmap uses them,
as does rpc.statd/mountd.
M
pgp0.pgp
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:24:16 +0300
Manolis Tzanidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [20030616] Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Just got both machines to nfs mount. everything is working.
> >
> > I had to "tinkering", ie getting very frus
[20030616] Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Just got both machines to nfs mount. everything is working.
>
> I had to "tinkering", ie getting very frustrated, and started
> sopping/starting all of the services on both machines, and exporting,
> re-exporting
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alvin,
Just got both machines to nfs mount. everything is working.
I had to "tinkering", ie getting very frustrated, and started
sopping/starting all of the services on both machines, and exporting,
hi jon...
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:12:53 +0200
> Jon Haugsand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nfs is a pain in the ...
> >
> > >
> > > I've edited the /etc/exports file, to match the previous settings,
> > > but I'm getting this error message;
> > >
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:12:53 +0200
Jon Haugsand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Rodney D. Myers
> > I've re-installed debian, trying to get better hardware
> > detection/setup.
> >
> > Everything installed okay, still requires some tinkering.
> >
> > My one glaring problem. I cannot get my /home di
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Jon Haugsand wrote:
> * Alvin Oga
> > add soft to your mount options, so that the sytem can keep going
> > vs using hard mount which waits for the remotefs to come back online
> > - i rather use/risk soft mounts than to sit and wait
> > in a hung state ... the pc is
* Alvin Oga
> add soft to your mount options, so that the sytem can keep going
> vs using hard mount which waits for the remotefs to come back online
> - i rather use/risk soft mounts than to sit and wait
> in a hung state ... the pc is useless in that state anyway
>
> - and over
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Jon Haugsand wrote:
> * Shaul Karl
> > Just wondering: have you considered a replacement? Maybe you dropped it
> > all together? For some reason I believe that the 2.5 kernel
> > configuration help are not suggesting CODA in the strong way that the
> > 2.4 used to. Does NFS
* Shaul Karl
> Just wondering: have you considered a replacement? Maybe you dropped it
> all together? For some reason I believe that the 2.5 kernel
> configuration help are not suggesting CODA in the strong way that the
> 2.4 used to. Does NFS v4 much better then v3?
Haven't tried, really. Jus
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:12:53AM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote:
>
> Nfs is a pain in the ...
>
Just wondering: have you considered a replacement? Maybe you dropped it
all together? For some reason I believe that the 2.5 kernel
configuration help are not suggesting CODA in the strong way that the
* Rodney D. Myers
> I've re-installed debian, trying to get better hardware detection/setup.
>
> Everything installed okay, still requires some tinkering.
>
> My one glaring problem. I cannot get my /home directory nfs mounted to
> this machine.
Nfs is a pain in the ...
>
> I've edited the /etc/e
I've re-installed debian, trying to get better hardware detection/setup.
Everything installed okay, still requires some tinkering.
My one glaring problem. I cannot get my /home directory nfs mounted to
this machine.
I've edited the /etc/exports file, to match the previous settings, but
I'm getti
Hi,
Is using an nfs mount for / during the debian insall supported in any way? or
plan to be supported?
-jason pepas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I'm encountering problems trying to nfs mount a ifle system to the debian
bootstrap system during an install. I'll try to provide all details I can
think of below.
The base system is RH7.3, the nfs mount problem has occurred with both
hercules versions 2.16.5 and 2.17
Hi everybody!
I'm having a bit of trouble with NFS exports in a standard Woody-dist. with
the standard CD-image kernel named 2.2.20-idepci.
I'm trying to export the directory ns1.knorca.se:/test (rwxrwxrwx) with the
owner nobody.nogroup to the computer ns1 (that is export the directory to
the
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 02:35, Tom Cook wrote:
> Oliver Elphick wrote:
> [snip]
>
> What does 'ls -l /usr1 /usr2 /usr3' tell you?
No clues there:
$ ls -ld /usr1 /usr2 /usr3 /usr1/usr2
drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 1024 Feb 8 00:46 /usr1
drwxr-xr-x9 root root 1024 Feb 8 01
Oliver Elphick wrote:
[snip]
What does 'ls -l /usr1 /usr2 /usr3' tell you?
Tom
nfs-kernel-server version 1.0-2
/etc/exports:
/usr1 louise(rw) elsie(rw) sarah(rw) rover(rw,no_root_squash)
192.168.1.105
/usr2 louise(rw) elsie(rw) sarah(rw) rover(rw,no_root_squash)
192.168.1.105
/usr3 louise(rw) elsie(rw) sarah(rw) rover(rw,no_root_squash)
192.168.1.105
mount from sarah
On Thursday 31 January 2002 05:13 am, Dougie Nisbet wrote:
> I've just discovered this by accident. If I nfs mount another linux PC
> running woody, and that PC has a native windows 98 file system mounted
> under /98, then it is automatically seen and browseable as the nfs mounted
I've just discovered this by accident. If I nfs mount another linux PC
running woody, and that PC has a native windows 98 file system mounted under
/98, then it is automatically seen and browseable as the nfs mounted file
system. This surprised me. It isn't the case for the o
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:15:45PM -0500, Stephen E. Hargrove wrote:
> How do I prevent NFS filesystems from mounting when I start up my
> computer. As the system is booting, it attempts to mount them, and I only
> want them mounted when I want them. Here's one example from my fstab:
>
> papa:/m
The Automounter will help you. The documentation wasn't real clear to me
at first, but I managed to get it up and running.
See the Automounter mini-HOWTO at:
http://www.kernel.org/LDP/HOWTO/mini/Automount.html or your favorite LDP
mirror for more details.
--Rich
"Stephen E. Hargrove" wrote:
>
How do I prevent NFS filesystems from mounting when I start up my
computer. As the system is booting, it attempts to mount them, and I only
want them mounted when I want them. Here's one example from my fstab:
papa:/music/music nfs rsize=1024,wsize=1024 0 0
--
steve
*
Linux : htt
At 12:11 PM 11/27/00 +0100, you wrote:
DG> I was wondering what would be better to use in this situation.
DG> I want to basically be able to have read access to a particular LAN device
DG> on which the files are on a NT server and the client(s) that I want to be
DG> able to read files (mostly spr
Hello Debian,
Saturday, November 25, 2000, 8:52:22 PM, you wrote:
DG> Hey Guys,
DG> I was wondering what would be better to use in this situation.
DG> I want to basically be able to have read access to a particular LAN device
DG> on which the files are on a NT server and the client(s) that I want
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 05:01:29PM -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
> Thank you for the reply.
> So samba is the only way to "mount" an NT filesystem? Sounds good...
> Do I need to run a samba server on the linux machine or would the server
> be an application on the NT machine. I went to samba.org/samba
You do not need to run a samba server to mount filesystems on your Linux
box from NT via samba
At 17:01 2000-11-25 -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
Thank you for the reply.
So samba is the only way to "mount" an NT filesystem? Sounds good...
Do I need to run a samba server on the linux machine or wo
There is some NFS products for NT
At 16:37 2000-11-25 -0500, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
Hi,
AFAIK if the files are on an NT server your only option is samba,
although if you really wanted to get weird you could use appletalk
wich both NT and GNU/Linux (via netatalk) can speak
-Jon
--
To UNSUB
Thank you for the reply.
So samba is the only way to "mount" an NT filesystem? Sounds good...
Do I need to run a samba server on the linux machine or would the server
be an application on the NT machine. I went to samba.org/samba to read the
FAQs and I'm still a little confused as to what I do to g
Hi,
AFAIK if the files are on an NT server your only option is samba,
although if you really wanted to get weird you could use appletalk
wich both NT and GNU/Linux (via netatalk) can speak
-Jon
Hey Guys,
I was wondering what would be better to use in this situation.
I want to basically be able to have read access to a particular LAN device
on which the files are on a NT server and the client(s) that I want to be
able to read files (mostly spreadsheets *.xls) that change daily. So I
guess
ery time I restart
the daemon. When I stop nfs-common and try do to an NFS mount, the
mount process still hangs and the volume isn't mounted, but the server
claims the mount succeeded and if I run `showmount servername` the
client shows up in the list.
I browsed the man pages and docs related to
Greetings from a (currently) warm and sunny Winnipeg.
My problem is that my machine occasionaly locks up completely (no
response whatsoever...not even num/caps lock or mouse), requiring a cold
boot, after attempting to mount and NFS volume.
Any pointers as to what I should be looking at?
Thanks
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
