In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>> I have heard that file locking is not implemented in the user
>> level server, but you need the kernel level server instead.
>
>Well, that would explain why it wouldn't work Is this documented
>anywhere?
I think I saw a message on the linux-kernel
Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have heard that file locking is not implemented in the user
> level server, but you need the kernel level server instead.
Well, that would explain why it wouldn't work Is this documented
anywhere?
I did some Usenet searching and came up with an artic
>The problem is that file locking does not work. If I upgrade mutt
>to one of the newer versions (e.g., 1.0pre3-1.2), mutt attempts to
>lock my mailbox even though I'm using Maildir and not mbox format.
>(See bug #44386.) I've also experienced a "hang" when Angband (variants)
>attempt to lock the
NFS server: Linux dwarf 2.2.12 #2 Fri Oct 8 20:52:57 EDT 1999 i686 unknown
ii nfs-common 1.4.7-2Common NFS Tools
ii nfs-server 2.2beta46-2User space NFS server.
NFS client: Linux jekyll 2.2.12 #5 Sat Sep 4 11:28:01 EDT 1999 i586 unknown
ii nfs-common 1.4.7-2
4 matches
Mail list logo
