* Osamu Aoki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
...
> Anyway, it was interesting. this was not "my document" but quite
> thought provoking for me
Good. Then my ranting was not entirely in vain.
Dima
--
We're sysadmins. Sanity happens to other people. -- Chris King
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 01:37:56PM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> * Dimitri Maziuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> 4. this whole mess is signed with *my* name and e-mail address, and
> 5. NOBODY TOLD ME THEY WERE GOING TO PUT MY NAME ON IT.
When people like me volunteered to summarize informat
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 11:21:28AM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> * Crispin Wellington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> > On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 18:13, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> ...
> > > I fail to understand why you came up with the example above. No one
> > > have suggested or commented any such th
* Dimitri Maziuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> * Crispin Wellington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> > On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 18:13, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> ...
> > > I fail to understand why you came up with the example above. No one
> > > have suggested or commented any such thing.
> >
> >
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:31:09AM -1000, Joseph Dane wrote:
> > "Hans" == Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hans> Since no one else has disputed this post yet, I think it is
> Hans> time to do so. I have used X-forwarding over SSH enough to know
> Hans> that you need not and you
> "Hans" == Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hans> Since no one else has disputed this post yet, I think it is
Hans> time to do so. I have used X-forwarding over SSH enough to know
Hans> that you need not and you should not set $DISPLAY manually.
no, you don't need to set DISPLAY.
* Crispin Wellington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 18:13, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
...
> > I fail to understand why you came up with the example above. No one
> > have suggested or commented any such thing.
>
> I wasn't subscribed when the first post came in so Im exempt. Bu
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 18:13, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:44:40PM -1000, Joseph Dane wrote:
> > > "Hans" == Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Hans> This tip is bad. It does not work. The first line makes the
> > Hans> following fail (or, I think, in case of
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:44:40PM -1000, Joseph Dane wrote:
> > "Hans" == Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hans> This tip is bad. It does not work. The first line makes the
> Hans> following fail (or, I think, in case of bad security on client
> Hans> succeed but by-pass the ss
> "Hans" == Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hans> This tip is bad. It does not work. The first line makes the
Hans> following fail (or, I think, in case of bad security on client
Hans> succeed but by-pass the ssh-tunnel).
no, it works as expected. if the tip had been
client> s
* Hans Ekbrand ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:36:15AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > DEBIAN NEWBIE TIP #110 from Dimitri Maziuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > :
> > Here's how to TUNNEL SECURE X11 CONNECTIONS THROUGH SSH: on the
> > client, do this:
> > client# export
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:36:15AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> DEBIAN NEWBIE TIP #110 from Dimitri Maziuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> :
> Here's how to TUNNEL SECURE X11 CONNECTIONS THROUGH SSH: on the
> client, do this:
> client# export DISPLAY=client:0.0
> client# ssh -X server
> then onc
12 matches
Mail list logo
