Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-19 Thread Arto Astala
this discussion was recently mirrored by smbfs on debian-devel result, IIRC, was to have scripts that dynamically branch on kernel version > [...] > > Also, packages ncpfs and ncpfsx have lots of >binaries, not just the ncpmount and ncpu

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-16 Thread Ben Pfaff
At 09:15 AM 2/15/98 -0500, Ben Pfaff wrote: > OK guys, I finally managed to make ncpfs-2.1.1 compile and work under > libc6. I have just released a new package called ncpfsx. Use this > package if you want to play around with ncpfs and kernels > 2.1.29. > For older kernels u

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-16 Thread Kevin Cave
Eloy A. Paris wrote: > > So far, the package is working great! > > > > The utilities working for me so far are: > > ncpmount,ncpumount,slist,nprint, > > nwfsinfo, > > > > and you may also be interested to learn, that nwuserlist works > > flawlessly, both on our Netware 4, and Netware 3

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-16 Thread Kevin Cave
Eloy A. Paris wrote: > At 02:01 PM 2/16/98 +, you wrote: > > >I've downloaded the package now, and will try it out later today. > >I'll get back to you on whether i'm successfull or not with it soon. > > So the URL was correct? Great, I didn't try it myself, I just saw a post > from someone gi

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-16 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eloy A. Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The problem is that upstream ncpfs-2.0.x and ncpfs-2.1.x are different >packages and I don't know how to create a binary package (a .deb) from two >different source packages. Ah, that's easy. Just look at how I did it with N

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-16 Thread Eloy A. Paris
At 02:01 PM 2/16/98 +, you wrote: >I've downloaded the package now, and will try it out later today. >I'll get back to you on whether i'm successfull or not with it soon. So the URL was correct? Great, I didn't try it myself, I just saw a post from someone giving the URL. I am very intereste

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-16 Thread Kevin cave
Eloy A. Paris wrote: > At 12:03 PM 2/16/98 +, Kevin cave wrote: > > >Sorry to be a pest, but can you tell me where I can find the Incoming > >directory? I'm probably being a bit daft, but I can't seem to find it under > >ftp.debian.org - if that's where it is.. > > Since the package ncpfsx is

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-16 Thread Eloy A. Paris
[cross-posted to debian-devel to get developer's feedback] Hi, At 09:15 AM 2/15/98 -0500, Ben Pfaff wrote: > OK guys, I finally managed to make ncpfs-2.1.1 compile and work under > libc6. I have just released a new package called ncpfsx. Use this > package if you want to play around with n

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-16 Thread Eloy A. Paris
At 12:03 PM 2/16/98 +, Kevin cave wrote: >Sorry to be a pest, but can you tell me where I can find the Incoming >directory? I'm probably being a bit daft, but I can't seem to find it under >ftp.debian.org - if that's where it is.. Since the package ncpfsx is new, processing takes longer than

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-16 Thread Kevin cave
Eloy A. Paris wrote: > Roy C Bixler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : Yes, this is a problem. The only fix I know of right now is to get the > : ncpfs-2.1.1.tar.gz file, compile with libc5 and use it. Elroy Paris did > > > OK guys, I finally managed to make ncpfs-2.1.1 compile and work under > li

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-15 Thread Ben Pfaff
OK guys, I finally managed to make ncpfs-2.1.1 compile and work under libc6. I have just released a new package called ncpfsx. Use this package if you want to play around with ncpfs and kernels > 2.1.29. For older kernels use package ncpfs. Would it be more convenient to merge the ncpf

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-15 Thread Eloy A. Paris
Roy C Bixler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : Yes, this is a problem. The only fix I know of right now is to get the : ncpfs-2.1.1.tar.gz file, compile with libc5 and use it. Elroy Paris did : some work to get ncpfs-2.0.11 to compile with libc6 and perhaps he knows : more about the status of ncpfs-2

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-13 Thread Roy C Bixler
On Fri, 13 Feb 1998, Kevin cave wrote: > Roy, I can't seem to locate "ncpfs-2.1.1.tar.gz" anywhere... Try 'ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/ncpfs' Maybe the confusion is that the file end in .tgz instead of .tar.gz ... --- Roy Bixler The University of Chicago Press [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSU

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-13 Thread Kevin cave
Roy C Bixler wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Kevin Cave wrote: > > I've now tried 2.1.86, and it still has the same problem. I can use > > "slist" to see the > > various Netware servers, but I can't mount the volumes, or send print > > files to 'em. > > Yes, this is a problem. The only fix I know o

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-13 Thread Kevin Cave
Roy C Bixler wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Kevin Cave wrote: > > I've now tried 2.1.86, and it still has the same problem. I can use > > "slist" to see the > > various Netware servers, but I can't mount the volumes, or send print > > files to 'em. > > Yes, this is a problem. The only fix I know o

Re: NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-12 Thread Roy C Bixler
On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Kevin Cave wrote: > I've now tried 2.1.86, and it still has the same problem. I can use > "slist" to see the > various Netware servers, but I can't mount the volumes, or send print > files to 'em. Yes, this is a problem. The only fix I know of right now is to get the ncpfs-2.

NCPFS seems broken on 2.1 kernels...

1998-02-12 Thread Kevin Cave
Hi All, On this machine at work, I use Debian Hamm, and, normally, kernel-2.0.32. Recently I compiled and tried kernel 2.1.81, and found that I could no longer mount Netware volumes onto my machine. I thought to myself "Oh well, could just be they'll fix that later", and went merrily back to good