On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 08:08:36PM +0200, Black Dew wrote:
> Francesco Bochicchio wrote:
>
> >What I do is this:
> > On the PC : iptables -t NAT -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE
>
> AFAIK it should be -t nat (lowercase). Upcase NAT gives the following
> error on my system:
Yes. I wrongl
Hello!
If you use ADSL, you are connected via eth0. The correct parameter is
nat and not NAT. Is the FORWARD chain configured as ACCEPT? Try it:
#iptables -F
#iptables -t nat -F
#iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
#iptables -P POSTROUTING ACCEPT
#iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
Assum
Francesco Bochicchio wrote:
What I do is this:
On the PC : iptables -t NAT -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE
AFAIK it should be -t nat (lowercase). Upcase NAT gives the following
error on my system:
iptables v1.2.11: can't initialize iptables table `NAT': Table does not
exist (do you
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 04:12:31PM +0100, Francesco Bochicchio wrote:
> On the PC : iptables -t NAT -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE
IIRC, the table for NAT is named 'nat' (ie, lowercase).
I'll bet it's this that's causing the problem.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Dwerryhouse
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:12:31 +0100, Francesco Bochicchio
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a laptop with installed Sarge and a PC with installed Sid. I would
> like to implement this schema:
>
>Laptop <-wireless-> PC+ADSL Modem< phone lines> Provider<..>Internet
>
> I had it wo
Hi all,
I have a laptop with installed Sarge and a PC with installed Sid. I would
like to implement this schema:
Laptop <-wireless-> PC+ADSL Modem< phone lines> Provider<..>Internet
I had it working in the past, but after a reinstallation of SID on the
PC, something broke.
All the connecti
6 matches
Mail list logo