On Mon,08.Sep.08, 17:22:50, Thomas H. George wrote:
[...]
> I agree the problem must be with the ISP's or Debian's spamfilter.
> Something must have changed recently as I posted from mutt for years
> with the old muttrc entries. It's surprising that more people haven't
> reported the problem.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:00:06PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,08.Sep.08, 14:23:42, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > You could try:
> > >
> > > set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > set use_envelope_from
> >
> > Made the suggested additions to muttrc and am sending this from mutt
>
>
On Mon,08.Sep.08, 14:23:42, Thomas H. George wrote:
[...]
> > You could try:
> >
> > set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > set use_envelope_from
>
> Made the suggested additions to muttrc and am sending this from mutt
Great! After reading some more it seems that setting 'use_envelope_from'
would have be
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 06:00:12PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:39:04 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > Again sending from iceape.
> >
> > I tried Florian's suggestion to set
> > smtp_url="smtp[s]://USER:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" both with and
> > without the entries for
[ I assume that you sent this privately by mistake, so I forward it to
the list. ]
> From: Johannes Wiedersich
> To: Florian Kulzer
> Subject: Re: Mutt Mail to List Fails
> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:03:00 +0200
>
> [Sorry for semi-hijacking the thread, but on a related issue
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:38:19PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,08.Sep.08, 10:39:04, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > In response to Andrei's question muttrc contains:
> >
> > set use_from=yes
> > set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > There is no entry in muttrc for envelope_from.
>
> Yo
On Mon,08.Sep.08, 10:39:04, Thomas H. George wrote:
[...]
> In response to Andrei's question muttrc contains:
>
> set use_from=yes
> set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> There is no entry in muttrc for envelope_from.
You could try:
set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set use_envelope_from
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you ca
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:39:04 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> Again sending from iceape.
>
> I tried Florian's suggestion to set
> smtp_url="smtp[s]://USER:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" both with and
> without the entries for USER and PASSWORD and also without the portion
> smtp[s]://. Regardless o
Again sending from iceape.
I tried Florian's suggestion to set
smtp_url="smtp[s]://USER:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" both with and
without the entries for USER and PASSWORD and also without the portion
smtp[s]://. Regardless of which form I used mutt responded "not a valid
url" and displayed everythin
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 14:24:41 -0400, Telemachus wrote:
> On Sun Sep 07 2008 @ 1:53, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > I am sending this message from iceape.
>
> Apologies to all: I managed to miss this line in my first read. I still
> think it's ISP related and not Mutt itself, however.
iceape ->
On Sun,07.Sep.08, 13:53:23, Thomas H. George wrote:
> Perplexing Problem: Mail sent from Mutt to debian-user@lists.debian.org
> apparently never reaches the list
>
>
> But
>
> Mail sent from Mutt
On Sun Sep 07 2008 @ 1:53, Thomas H. George wrote:
> Perplexing Problem: Mail sent from Mutt to debian-user@lists.debian.org
> apparently never reaches the list
>
>
>But
>
> Mail sent from Mut
On Sun Sep 07 2008 @ 1:53, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I am sending this message from iceape.
Apologies to all: I managed to miss this line in my first read. I still
think it's ISP related and not Mutt itself, however.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Perplexing Problem: Mail sent from Mutt to debian-user@lists.debian.org
apparently never reaches the list
But
Mail sent from Mutt to my daughter's email address @verizion.net is
transmitted
14 matches
Mail list logo
