Re: Mutt - Procmail Question

2001-11-10 Thread dman
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:48:29PM -0600, John Patton wrote: | On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:48:00PM +0530, Jijo Jose A wrote: ... | 'mutt -f my_mbox ', my_mbox is not a mailbox ... | > how can i solve this ? ... | then fix your procmail action accordingly. Once the mailbox is fixed, I recommend

Re: Mutt - Procmail Question

2001-11-10 Thread John Patton
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:48:00PM +0530, Jijo Jose A wrote: > hi all > still i used procmail 3.21.20010831.3.22pre-1 for mail processing and mutt > 1.3.22-1 as MUA, to remove the unwanted headers i wrote '|cat | formail -k -X > From: > -X Return-Path: -X Date:.. >>my_mbox' in .procmailrc as t

Mutt - Procmail Question

2001-11-10 Thread Jijo Jose A
hi all still i used procmail 3.21.20010831.3.22pre-1 for mail processing and mutt 1.3.22-1 as MUA, to remove the unwanted headers i wrote '|cat | formail -k -X From: -X Return-Path: -X Date:.. >>my_mbox' in .procmailrc as the action line for a condition. but i started 'mutt -f my_mbox ', my_m

Re: viewing pdf from mutt - procmail question?

2000-05-03 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 16:47:38 -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote: > I can view pdf attachments from mutt if they have mime headers like > > Content-Type: application/pdf; name="file.pdf" > > However I get quite a few emails with > > Content-Type: application/octet-stream > > Does anyone have a reli

viewing pdf from mutt - procmail question?

2000-05-02 Thread Lee Bradshaw
I can view pdf attachments from mutt if they have mime headers like Content-Type: application/pdf; name="file.pdf" However I get quite a few emails with Content-Type: application/octet-stream Does anyone have a reliable way for modifying the Content-Type and changing octet-stream to a useable