Hi, When installing from "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 6.0.7 "Squeeze" - Official
kfreebsd-i386 DVD Binary-1 20130223-17:32"the following problem issued from
"selecting and installing programs": the ability to choose between kernel "8"
and "8.1.1". The hardware I'm using: AMD Athlon XP 2200+, MSI 6511 v
>>> On (28/06/06 21:48), David Baron wrote:
>> > Then installed the nvidia-glx.
>> >
>> > Did not work. The libglx.so, etc were not installed anywhere I (or the
>> > xorg.conf) could find them. I will check again when the locate db is
>> > updated. Reinstalled the nvidia run meanwhile.
>>
>> dpkg -
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 22:34, James Westby wrote:
> On (28/06/06 21:48), David Baron wrote:
> > Then installed the nvidia-glx.
> >
> > Did not work. The libglx.so, etc were not installed anywhere I (or the
> > xorg.conf) could find them. I will check again when the locate db is
> > updated. Rein
Linas Žvirblis wrote:
Wulfy wrote:
Are there debs for the *legacy* driver?
Only for 7174.
I need the 7167 driver for my TNT2 card. I've been using the
.run file from nVidia and am having problems with the latest updated
2.6.8(-3-686) (sarge) kernel. It won't seem to compile fo
Wulfy wrote:
> Are there debs for the *legacy* driver?
Only for 7174.
> I need the 7167 driver for my TNT2 card. I've been using the
> .run file from nVidia and am having problems with the latest updated
> 2.6.8(-3-686) (sarge) kernel. It won't seem to compile for it and wants
> to remove the
James Westby wrote:
>> Then installed the nvidia-glx.
Did the package install cleanly or were there any errors?
>> Did not work. The libglx.so, etc were not installed anywhere I (or the
>> xorg.conf) could find them. I will check again when the locate db is
>> updated.
>> Reinstalled the nvid
On (28/06/06 21:48), David Baron wrote:
> Then installed the nvidia-glx.
>
> Did not work. The libglx.so, etc were not installed anywhere I (or the
> xorg.conf) could find them. I will check again when the locate db is updated.
> Reinstalled the nvidia run meanwhile.
dpkg -L nvidia-glx
should
> David Baron wrote:
> > OK. Now the question. Which packages are needed for a GEforce 440 card?
>
> Probably the normal (the non-legacy) driver packages.
>
> > ( compile my own kernels so the 2.6 kernel meta-stuff is probably not
> > appropriate since I always have full source. Still leaves a lot
Linas Žvirblis wrote:
David Baron wrote:
OK. Now the question. Which packages are needed for a GEforce 440 card?
Probably the normal (the non-legacy) driver packages.
Are there debs for the *legacy* driver? I couldn't find one when I was
looking. I need the 7167 driver for my TNT2
David Baron wrote:
> OK. Now the question. Which packages are needed for a GEforce 440 card?
Probably the normal (the non-legacy) driver packages.
> ( compile my own kernels so the 2.6 kernel meta-stuff is probably not
> appropriate since I always have full source. Still leaves a lot of differe
>> Are they "better" or equivalent? Probably updated with Xorg changes, etc.
>> which is better. However, the manufacturer must also know what they are
>> doing?
>Files inside are exactly the same, except maybe cases where certain
>modifications are needed to make them work in Debian.
OK. Folk
David Baron wrote:
> Are they "better" or equivalent? Probably updated with Xorg changes, etc.
> which is better. However, the manufacturer must also know what they are
> doing?
Files inside are exactly the same, except maybe cases where certain
modifications are needed to make them work in De
" or equivalent? Probably updated with Xorg changes, etc.
which is better. However, the manufacturer must also know what they are
doing?
>
> If you really want to use the installer, there is a way to use multiple
> kernels. If I remember correctly, it has an option for that in advanced
&
ay to use multiple
kernels. If I remember correctly, it has an option for that in advanced
options (--advanced-options).
> They surely would want to change this! No way to contact them?
There is also a forum [1] where you can contact NVIDIA developers, but,
as I said, it is already possibl
When I choose to reinstall the current Nvidia driver on my Linux box,
their .run program correctly first removes the existing version and then
procedes with all the steps which successfully install (reinstall) the Nvidia
graphics driver. GEforce 440.
Now, I had it working on a 2.6.16 kernel. I
I have a desktop at home that has RedHat 7.0 installed & RedHat 6.0
transferred (from another HD). After specifying the location of the
other kernel image as
image=/chopin/boot/vmlinuz
I have no problem switching between rh6 and rh7, with no error messages.
I thought I should be able to get
> > > > map=/boot/map
> > > > ^
> > > > Is this the system map you're referring to?
i hope not. /boot/map and System.map are very different.
/boot/map is the boot sector map while System.map map memory
instructions to kernel instructions.
if yo
Ah, yes. Sorry, I keep forgetting to replace the replyto on this list.
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> You meant to post this to list?
>
> on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 02:06:16PM +, Lee Elliott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > >
> > > on Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 06:
on Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 06:39:54PM -0500, Fu-Dong Chiou ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:03:02PM -0500, Fu-Dong Chiou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > edu) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a problem. I have RedHat on /dev/hd1, and Debian on /de
Tim Ferrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what kind of entry do I need to add to lilo.conf to get lilo to boot
> a alternate kernel located on a Zip disk? I can use a custom boot floppy
> and mount the Zip disk (/dev/sda1) as root but it would be simpler if
> I didn't need the floppy... one less d
what kind of entry do I need to add to lilo.conf to get lilo to boot
a alternate kernel located on a Zip disk? I can use a custom boot floppy
and mount the Zip disk (/dev/sda1) as root but it would be simpler if
I didn't need the floppy... one less disk to misplace ;-)
Thanks,
Tim
--
## #
On Fri, 20 Jun 1997 15:36:17 -0700 , Stephen Zander wrote:
>
> Is there some way to pass an alternate name from /System.map (or
> /boot/System.map) to the kernel at boot? I'm mucking with a
> custom kernel but want to leave the 2.0.30 image safely intact.
> I've setup lilo.confto recognise /vmlin
Is there some way to pass an alternate name from /System.map (or
/boot/System.map) to the kernel at boot? I'm mucking with a
custom kernel but want to leave the 2.0.30 image safely intact.
I've setup lilo.confto recognise /vmlinuz.2.0.30 as a valid
kernel but can't figure out how to seperate the
23 matches
Mail list logo
