Re: Mozilla to Xprint to CUPS = no output.

2004-09-28 Thread Reid Priedhorsky
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:20:04 +0200, Marc Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:43:52PM -0500, Christopher L. Everett wrote: > > Marc Wilson wrote: > > > Sure. Don't use xprint. Mozilla is perfectly capable of generating > > > printed output on its own. > > > > > Yah, but for some reason wh

Re: Mozilla to Xprint to CUPS = no output.

2004-09-27 Thread Christopher L. Everett
Jacob S wrote: On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:43:52 -0500 "Christopher L. Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: arc Wilson wrote: n Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 05:36:09AM -0500, Christopher L. Everett wrote: <>I haven't been able to google up any mention of no output at all as result of this type setup, does anyon

Re: Mozilla to Xprint to CUPS = no output.

2004-09-27 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:43:52PM -0500, Christopher L. Everett wrote: > Marc Wilson wrote: > >Sure. Don't use xprint. Mozilla is perfectly capable of generating > >printed output on its own. > > > Yah, but for some reason when I remove Xprint, Mozilla starts groveling: > I wait for a bloody ete

Re: Mozilla to Xprint to CUPS = no output.

2004-09-27 Thread Jacob S
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:43:52 -0500 "Christopher L. Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marc Wilson wrote: > > >On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 05:36:09AM -0500, Christopher L. Everett > >wrote: > > > >>I haven't been able to google up any mention of no output at all as > >a>result of this type setup, d

Re: Mozilla to Xprint to CUPS = no output.

2004-09-27 Thread Christopher L. Everett
Marc Wilson wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 05:36:09AM -0500, Christopher L. Everett wrote: I haven't been able to google up any mention of no output at all as a result of this type setup, does anyone have a clue for me? Sure. Don't use xprint. Mozilla is perfectly capable of generating pr

Re: Mozilla to Xprint to CUPS = no output.

2004-09-27 Thread Clive Menzies
On (27/09/04 12:13), John L Fjellstad wrote: > Matt Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The printer is using a direct (9100) socket. It's HP > > Color Laser 2500n. It's just mozilla that causes > > problems. Just nothing comes out. No errors. > > I haven't been able to print using the debia

Re: Mozilla to Xprint to CUPS = no output.

2004-09-27 Thread John L Fjellstad
Matt Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The printer is using a direct (9100) socket. It's HP > Color Laser 2500n. It's just mozilla that causes > problems. Just nothing comes out. No errors. I haven't been able to print using the debian mozilla packages. Try to oppstream package from mozilla.

Re: Mozilla to Xprint to CUPS = no output.

2004-09-27 Thread Brad Sims
On Monday 27 September 2004 10:49 am, John L Fjellstad wrote: > Is that possible with the Debian Mozilla packages?  I remember a thread > a couple of weeks ago saying that that functionality had been removed > in the debian package (I wouldn't know, since I've gotten used to using > the mozilla.org

Re: Mozilla to Xprint to CUPS = no output.

2004-09-27 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:49:10AM -0700, John L Fjellstad wrote: > Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Sure. Don't use xprint. Mozilla is perfectly capable of generating > > printed output on its own. > > Is that possible with the Debian Mozilla packages? Certainly. When pressed ab