Re: Mozilla on woody.

2001-10-16 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 01:23:44 +0200, Frank Preut wrote: > hm, i didn't find that very useful.. does that mean, trying to apt-get > mozilla 0.9.5-2_i386 isn't possible because the way it is packaged it can't > decide which to install first so that it works.. ?! That's just a peculiarity of the s

Re: Mozilla on woody.

2001-10-15 Thread Frank Preut
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 11:42:44PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > No, very public reasons: > http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html > hm, i didn't find that very useful.. does that mean, trying to apt-get mozilla 0.9.5-2_i386 isn't possible because the way it is packag

Re: Mozilla on woody.

2001-10-15 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 22:57:25 +0200, Frank Preut wrote: > does anyone know why mozilla in woody isn't linked to the pool (i.e., > basically, sid): the latest mozilla packages (i'm manually downloading the > debs for 0.9.5 right now) are in the pool on the non-us servers.. but why > does woody st

Re: Mozilla on woody.

2001-10-15 Thread Frank Preut
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 03:23:48PM -0400, Thomas Hallaran wrote: > Anyone know the best place to ged debs for Mozilla 9.5/woody. > I have only been able to find 9.3 kicking around. > The Mozilla in sid appears to be 9.4 so I am not holding my breath. > Anybody sitting on unoficial apt sources for m

Mozilla on woody.

2001-10-15 Thread Thomas Hallaran
Anyone know the best place to ged debs for Mozilla 9.5/woody. I have only been able to find 9.3 kicking around. The Mozilla in sid appears to be 9.4 so I am not holding my breath. Anybody sitting on unoficial apt sources for mozilla 9.5? Thanks, Tom