Hello Evan
On Sonntag, 13-Jul-03 at 00:37:54, Evan Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 05:47:05PM +0200, Andreas Wüst wrote:
>> I've installed gnome2 from unstable and am running mozilla 1.0 from
>> stable. To go straight, the mozilla ui (i.e. menu, bookmark bar,
>>
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 05:47:05PM +0200, Andreas Wüst wrote:
> I've installed gnome2 from unstable and am running mozilla 1.0 from
> stable. To go straight, the mozilla ui (i.e. menu, bookmark bar, etc.)
> fonts are just ways too big! With gnome1.4 this hasn't been a probl
t;> On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 17:47, Andreas Wüst wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I've installed gnome2 from unstable and am running mozilla 1.0 from
> >>> stable. To go straight, the mozilla ui (i.e. menu, bookmark bar,
> >>> etc.) fonts are just ways too
eas Wüst wrote:
>>>
>>> I've installed gnome2 from unstable and am running mozilla 1.0 from
>>> stable. To go straight, the mozilla ui (i.e. menu, bookmark bar,
>>> etc.) fonts are just ways too big! With gnome1.4 this hasn't been a
>>> problem s
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 00:23, Andreas Wüst wrote:
>
> On Mittwoch, 09-Jul-03 at 22:30:19, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 17:47, Andreas Wüst wrote:
> >>
> >> I've installed gnome2 from unstable and am running mozilla 1.0 from
> >&
Hello Michel
Thanks a lot for your answer!!
On Mittwoch, 09-Jul-03 at 22:30:19, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 17:47, Andreas Wüst wrote:
>>
>> I've installed gnome2 from unstable and am running mozilla 1.0 from
>> stable. To go straight, the mozilla u
On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 17:47, Andreas Wüst wrote:
>
> I've installed gnome2 from unstable and am running mozilla 1.0 from
> stable. To go straight, the mozilla ui (i.e. menu, bookmark bar, etc.)
> fonts are just ways too big! With gnome1.4 this hasn't been a problem
>
/mirrors.evilgeniuses.org.uk/debian/
backports/woody/ gnome2.2/mozilla-1.3/
Thanks a lot! But it's not the woody aspect that keeps me with mozilla
1.0, since I also run the gnome stuff from sid, it's merely the fact
that 1.0 is the so called stable branch, and only 1.4 is going to be
obody
seemed to know the answer)
Hi
I've installed gnome2 from unstable and am running mozilla 1.0 from
stable. To go straight, the mozilla ui (i.e. menu, bookmark bar, etc.)
fonts are just ways too big! With gnome1.4 this hasn't been a problem
since mozilla 1.0 seemed to listen to the &q
.
Andreas Wüst a écrit :
(please cc me since I am not subscribed to the -gtk-gnome list)
(Please note that I've alredy asked this question on -user, but nobody
seemed to know the answer)
Hi
I've installed gnome2 from unstable and am running mozilla 1.0 from
stable. To go straight, the
Le sam 05/07/2003 à 17:47, Andreas Wüst a écrit :
> (please cc me since I am not subscribed to the -gtk-gnome list)
>
> (Please note that I've alredy asked this question on -user, but nobody
> seemed to know the answer)
>
> Hi
>
> I've installed gnome2 from u
(please cc me since I am not subscribed to the -user list)
Hi
I've installed gnome2 from unstable and am running mozilla 1.0 from
stable. To go straight, the mozilla ui (i.e. menu, bookmark bar, etc.)
fonts are just ways too big! With gnome1.4 this hasn't been a problem
since m
are at least as -rw-r--r--. Let me know if it works.
>
> good luck
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 10:51:24AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
>> Michael Bona wrote:
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I am having a strange problem: Running Mozilla (1.0 on Woody) as Root is
>>fine. S
You should check for file permisions in /usr/lib/mozilla/chrome and see if
that all .jar files are at least as -rw-r--r--. Let me know if it works.
good luck
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 10:51:24AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Michael Bona wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I am having a strange problem:
Michael Bona wrote:
Hi,
I am having a strange problem: Running Mozilla (1.0 on Woody) as Root is
fine. Starting it as a user produces a Mozilla window without top menu,
context menue and no tabs.
Any help? Thanks!
Michael
It's probably something in your prefs.js file. I'd exit
Michael Bona wrote:
Hi,
I am having a strange problem: Running Mozilla (1.0 on Woody) as Root is
fine. Starting it as a user produces a Mozilla window without top menu,
context menue and no tabs.
Any help? Thanks!
Michael
1- It's probably your profile which is bad. Create a new one (t
Hi,
I am having a strange problem: Running Mozilla (1.0 on Woody) as Root is
fine. Starting it as a user produces a Mozilla window without top menu,
context menue and no tabs.
Any help? Thanks!
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Hi Ron,
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 22:50 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> > > > Not all of us have/want sound cards!!!
> > >
> > > Of course! Is there a problem in this list to discuss
> > > soundcard-reated problems?
> > >
> > > I may misunderstood your arguement.
> >
> > Hes is/was trying to be funny/o
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 14:56, Wayne Topa wrote:
> Gerhard Gaussling([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > Hi Ron,
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 19:35 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> >
> > > Not all of us have/want sound cards!!!
> >
> > Of course! Is there a problem in this list to discu
Gerhard Gaussling([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi Ron,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 19:35 schrieb Ron Johnson:
>
> > Not all of us have/want sound cards!!!
>
> Of course! Is there a problem in this list to discuss
> soundcard-reated problems?
>
> I may misunderstood your
Hi Ron,
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 19:35 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> Not all of us have/want sound cards!!!
Of course! Is there a problem in this list to discuss
soundcard-reated problems?
I may misunderstood your arguement.
regards
gerhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 10:43, René Seindal wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:27:26PM +0200, Gerhard Gaussling wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2002 23:31 schrieb Richard Beri:
[snip]
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148219 which appears to
> related to some problem with flash and soun
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 17:43 schrieb René Seindal:
> Do you think this is related to
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148219 which appears
> to related to some problem with flash and sound. The bug is not
> reproduceable by all. It still happens to me, starting from
> Mozilla
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:27:26PM +0200, Gerhard Gaussling wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2002 23:31 schrieb Richard Beri:
> > I tried the "dpkg-reconfigure mozilla-browser" and set the audio
> > to "none" but mozilla was still crashing. Right now I have just
> > disabled the kde artsd server alt
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2002 23:31 schrieb Richard Beri:
> I tried the "dpkg-reconfigure mozilla-browser" and set the audio
> to "none" but mozilla was still crashing. Right now I have just
> disabled the kde artsd server altogether and mozilla is stable.
> Granted I have no sound in kde, but I can
search in several german mozilla
> and debian groups. I never received a fully satisfied answer.
>
> My last chance is to purge anything that has to do with mozilla,
> because I have at least 4 versions shoulder at shoulder (like the
> germans use to say :). After deleting all
>
> Notice that `ls` takes no time at all (At least under Linux w/ ext2)
>
> Then start up your browser (Netscape 4.77 or Mozilla 0.9.9 in my case).
> Type "file:///home/you/test" in location, time!
>
> --My results----------
> Mozilla - 9 second
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 03:51, Oleg wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2002 10:12 pm, John Griffiths wrote:
> > >My theory is that others experience the same (after all, it's just ones
> > > and zeros, not weather forcasting), but everyone is afraid to speak up
> > > for political reasons, since Mozilla is
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 10:58 pm, John Griffiths wrote:
> lynx beats them all for straight text. try nested tables, javascript,
> anigifs, and flash plugins on the same page.
>
> Thats when you find out what your browser's worth
>
> YMMV yourself, but my job takes me to these monstrosities all the
ause I have at least 4 versions shoulder at shoulder (like the
germans use to say :). After deleting all traces of them I'll
gonna reinstall one mozilla 1.0 version with apt-get from unstable.
There is a chance that the earlier installed tarballs desturb the
method to avoid mozilla to grab for
Thanks, this seems to work!
.
>
> You can try to dpkg-reconfigure mozilla-browser to stop Mozilla
> from grabbing esd.
>
> Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(I repeated the whole experiment twice for each browser, starting them
before
>and shutting them down after the experiment)
>
>HW: K6-2 550 w/ 256 MB (Java disabled in Netscape. Don't know about
Mozilla -
>whichever way it comes on Woody)
first problem, woody's version isn't close to the 1.0 re
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 10:12 pm, John Griffiths wrote:
> >My theory is that others experience the same (after all, it's just ones
> > and zeros, not weather forcasting), but everyone is afraid to speak up
> > for political reasons, since Mozilla is thought of as IE's competitor on
> > Windows.
> >
>My theory is that others experience the same (after all, it's just ones and
>zeros, not weather forcasting), but everyone is afraid to speak up for
>political reasons, since Mozilla is thought of as IE's competitor on Windows.
>
>End of troll. Dictated, but not read. YMMV IFF you are a lying SOB
People keep claiming that they are improving Mozilla and that it's not
Slow-zilla any more, but it has always been my experience, regardless of
Mozilla's version or hardware, that it is at least 2 or 3 times slower than
other browsers (Netscape 4.7 on Linux and IE on Windows)
My theory is that
Interesting, you are right. If I kill the artsd sound server mozilla
clears itself up and that page will load without a problem when I
reload mozilla, if I disable the artsd (kde sound server). So the dpkg
-reconfigure doesn't help?
On June 11, 2002 03:30 pm, gerhard wrote:
> Hi Dave, Hi fol
At 07:53 PM 6/11/02 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>On 11/06/02 John Griffiths did speaketh:
>
>> on the subject of moz, does anyone know of any debs for 1.0 suitable for
>> potato?
>
>You might want to just grab the binary tarball from the Mozilla website.
>
>Mike
Thanks Mike,
I used t
On 11/06/02 John Griffiths did speaketh:
> on the subject of moz, does anyone know of any debs for 1.0 suitable for
> potato?
You might want to just grab the binary tarball from the Mozilla website.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08
"...the word HA
Hi Dave, Hi folks,
Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2002 06:09 schrieb Dave Thayer:
> This page has a flash plugin in it. There are several mentions of
> problems with flash problems in the moz release notes. In
> particular, the flash plugin doesn't seem to share the audio
> device nicely.
You're right, M
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 03:09:11PM -0400, Oleg wrote:
> Please keep debian-user@lists.debian.org in "Cc" or "To" headers, so we can
> sort mail efficiently.
Sorting mail on either of those is unreliable anyway. Using the
X-Mailing-List: header works better for Debian lists.
--
Colin Watson
Please keep debian-user@lists.debian.org in "Cc" or "To" headers, so we can
sort mail efficiently.
Oleg
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 02:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:16:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i'm not positive how to reproduce it, but i did figure out that
> mozilla was blocking while trying to talk to esd. killing esd freed
> it up and let it run. i've had trouble with esd blocking things up
> before, especially gqmp
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:36:40AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 21:57, Richard Beri wrote:
> > Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in
Sid?
> > So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this
problem
> > with R
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 21:57, Richard Beri wrote:
> > Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in Sid?
> > So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this problem
> > with RC1-3 and thought that 1.0final would clea
On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 21:57, Richard Beri wrote:
> Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in Sid?
> So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this problem
> with RC1-3 and thought that 1.0final would clear it up but it hasn't.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:57:53PM -0400, Richard Beri wrote:
> Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in Sid?
> So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this problem
> with RC1-3 and thought that 1.0final would clear it up but it hasn't.
briliant
didn't realise ximinan had done this.
thanks!
At 11:48 AM 6/11/02 +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:27, John Griffiths wrote:
>> on the subject of moz, does anyone know of any debs for 1.0 suitable for
>> potato?
>
>If you're talking about ready-to-install de
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:27, John Griffiths wrote:
> on the subject of moz, does anyone know of any debs for 1.0 suitable for
> potato?
If you're talking about ready-to-install debs of Moz 1.0, you can check
out Ximian GNOME's debs for Mozilla. Add the line
deb http://red-carpet.ximian.com/debian
on the subject of moz, does anyone know of any debs for 1.0 suitable for
potato?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Beri wrote:
Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in Sid?
So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this problem
with RC1-3 and thought that 1.0final would clear it up but it hasn't.
Try http://www.radiocontrolledclock.com and thats jus
Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in Sid?
So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this problem
with RC1-3 and thought that 1.0final would clear it up but it hasn't.
Try http://www.radiocontrolledclock.com and thats just the tip of the
ic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeronimo Pellegrini) writes:
> > According to a comment on DP.org, the security patches will be applied
> > to the version currently in woody (0.9.9, I think) instead of uploading
> > a whole new version.
>
> What about non-security fixes? There was a lot of bug-fixing before
>
> According to a comment on DP.org, the security patches will be applied
> to the version currently in woody (0.9.9, I think) instead of uploading
> a whole new version.
What about non-security fixes? There was a lot of bug-fixing before
1.0...
J.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
"J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 13:38:52 -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> > Now that Mozilla 1.0 has been released, and Debian 3.0 is stuck in a
> > frozen state, is there anyway that we can sneak Mozilla 1.0 into the
>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 13:38:52 -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> Now that Mozilla 1.0 has been released, and Debian 3.0 is stuck in a
> frozen state, is there anyway that we can sneak Mozilla 1.0 into the
> release?
It is a virtual certainty that 3.0 will not be released with the mozil
Hi Bryan,
Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> Now that Mozilla 1.0 has been released, and Debian 3.0 is stuck in a
> frozen state, is there anyway that we can sneak Mozilla 1.0 into the
> release? It would be a shame to release Debian 3.0 in the next couple
> of weeks and not include Moz
Now that Mozilla 1.0 has been released, and Debian 3.0 is stuck in a
frozen state, is there anyway that we can sneak Mozilla 1.0 into the
release? It would be a shame to release Debian 3.0 in the next couple
of weeks and not include Moz 1.0.
-Bryan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
57 matches
Mail list logo
