Rob wrote:
Here is the problem. When you close the browser it goes through some sort of
cleanup process. When you are logged on to a limited user account you cannot
launch the browser. Every time you try to you get a message that a previous
installation has not finished. And if you try to click o
Here is the problem. When you close the browser it goes through some
sort of cleanup process. When you are logged on to a limited user account you
cannot launch the browser. Every time you try to you get a message that a
previous installation has not finished. And if you try to click on the
Enrique Samson Jr. wrote:
Excuse me but I can't seem to find the root of the threed from the
archives. What is the trouble being talked about here? Because I'm also
having mine. I'm using Mozilla 1.5 from debian package 1.5-3. I have
downloaded the java plugin from netscape.com and it was auto i
I installed j2re1.4 (see apt-get.org) and it worked right away with Mozilla.
Chris
Am Wednesday 07 April 2004 10:37 schrieb Enrique Samson Jr.:
> Excuse me but I can't seem to find the root of the threed from the
> archives. What is the trouble being talked about here? Because I'm also
> having
Excuse me but I can't seem to find the root of the threed from the
archives. What is the trouble being talked about here? Because I'm also
having mine. I'm using Mozilla 1.5 from debian package 1.5-3. I have
downloaded the java plugin from netscape.com and it was auto installed.
I can see libj
41 +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The compiler version is always important (due to the nature of C).
> >>
> >>Any pointers to an explanation about why is that?
> >
> >
> > Take a look at Re: Compiler choice for OSS (WAS: Re: Troub
C).
>>
>> Any pointers to an explanation about why is that?
>
>
> Take a look at Re: Compiler choice for OSS (WAS: Re: Trouble with
> Mozilla Java plugin) tread.
Not enough for my curiosity.
--
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
--
To UNSU
On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:39:41 +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> On Sunday 01 June 2003 07:15, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
>> --- Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>>
>> > That is a version compiled with gcc 3.2, and it works for me
>> > (whereas the version from that apt archive doesn't).
>>
>> Th
on about why is that?
> >
> > Take a look at Re: Compiler choice for OSS (WAS: Re: Trouble with
> > Mozilla Java plugin) tread.
>
> Not enough for my curiosity.
Then I guess you should specify in more detail, what exactly you are
looking for, so that someone here, mig
On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 17:51:30 +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> On Sunday 01 June 2003 14:49, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
> wrote:
>>
>> Any pointers to an explanation about why is that?
>
> Take a look at Re: Compiler choice for OSS (WAS: Re: Trouble with
>
On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 15:31:27 +0200, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> If you want high speed and the last bit of optimization, you
> might be better off with something else like Intel's ICC which can be a _lot_
> faster for some tasks.
If you want high speed, you are running a RISC SMP where Intel
On Sunday 01 June 2003 15:09, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> --- Aryan Ameri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > The compiler version is always important (due to the nature of C).
> > For example Mozilla 1.4 can be compiled with gcc on windows, but no
> > plugin would then work with it, because all the pl
gt; impact). Thanks.
> >
> > The compiler version is always important (due to the nature of C).
>
> Any pointers to an explanation about why is that?
Take a look at Re: Compiler choice for OSS (WAS: Re: Trouble with
Mozilla Java plugin) tread.
Cheers
--
/* There is SCO
On Sunday 01 June 2003 14:09, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> This is something I have always wondered about. Why do OSS projects use
> gcc for every platform except Windows? I thought one of the great
> advantages of gcc was that is was ported to pretty much every operating
> system. Why not just alwa
--- Aryan Ameri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> The compiler version is always important (due to the nature of C).
> For example Mozilla 1.4 can be compiled with gcc on windows, but no
> plugin would then work with it, because all the plugins have been
> compiled with the Microsoft compiler.
T
On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:39:41 +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> On Sunday 01 June 2003 07:15, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> That sure did the trick (I didn't realize the gcc version had an
>> impact). Thanks.
>
> The compiler version is always important (due to the nature of C).
Any pointers to
On Sunday 01 June 2003 07:15, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> --- Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > That is almost undoubtedly due to that version of Java being
> > compiled with gcc 2.95, and mozilla being compiled with gcc 3.x.
> > The dates on the files from that mirror are quite old..
--- Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> That is almost undoubtedly due to that version of Java being compiled
> with gcc 2.95, and mozilla being compiled with gcc 3.x. The dates on
> the files from that mirror are quite old... Try using:
>
ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/JDK-1.4.1/i386/01
What exactly is the problem? Which version of java are you using? which
Debian release are you running and which version of mozilla are you
using?
The following worked for me:
* untar the sdk (the jre should work also). With Sun sdk1.4.1 it "just
works". With 1.3 (I think) it may or may not wor
Thus spake Roberto Sanchez:
> Hi all,
>
> I can't seem to get Mozilla (unstable) to recognize the Java plugin. I
> and installed by had the J2RE, first from Sun then from Blackdown. When
> neither of this worked, I added a Blackdown mirror to my sources.list.
>
> deb ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/l
Hi all,
I can't seem to get Mozilla (unstable) to recognize the Java plugin. I
and installed by had the J2RE, first from Sun then from Blackdown. When
neither of this worked, I added a Blackdown mirror to my sources.list.
deb ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian
On 26 Dec 2002, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> hi there:
>
> Using apt-get I have installed jdk1.1 runtime only (Sun's JRE) on my sarge.
> However I don't know how to add java to mozilla's/konqueror's plugins. I know
> there should be a file called libjavaplugin* or something like thisand that I
> should
hi there:
Using apt-get I have installed jdk1.1 runtime only (Sun's JRE) on my sarge.
However I don't know how to add java to mozilla's/konqueror's plugins. I know
there should be a file called libjavaplugin* or something like thisand that I
should make a symlink to it in the mozilla plugin dir
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:35:01AM -0800, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> So I tried it without that line:
>
> $ apt-get install j2sdk1.3
> [...]
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> j2sdk1.3: Depends: j2re1.3 (= 1.3.1.02b-2) but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Sorry, br
I found this on the list archive through a google search, but this
trick does not work for me. Perhaps something has changed in the last
6 months
Here's what I get when I try Lee's advice:
$ apt-get install j2sdk1.3 j2sdk1.3-doc-installer
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tr
Hi!
I seem to be having problems with java plugin and mozilla/galeon.
I noticed, that java enabled sites don't work any more withing
mozilla/galeon (java does not work, javascript does).
When I go to about:plugins page I see this at java plugin section:
Java(TM) Plug-in Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:35:15AM -0400, Bill from Tampa wrote:
> I'm running woody, with mozilla 0.9.9 and blackdown java 1.3.1 (Blackdown
> Java-Linux Java(TM) Plug-in 1.3.1), both installed with apt-get. When java
> use is turned on in mozilla, pages with java applets crash mozilla instantly.
I'm running woody, with mozilla 0.9.9 and blackdown java 1.3.1 (Blackdown
Java-Linux Java(TM) Plug-in 1.3.1), both installed with apt-get. When java
use is turned on in mozilla, pages with java applets crash mozilla instantly.
Turning off java allows the page to load normally without crashes, bu
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 15:32, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> I've installed the blackdown java packages. Add this line to
> /etc/apt/sources.list:
>
> deb ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian/
> woody non-free
>
> And then:
>
> apt-get update
> apt-get install j2sdk1
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:08:19PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
| Has anyone managed to install a working java plugin into the woody
| packages? If so, how?
Add a blackdown mirror to sources.list and 'apt-get install j2sdk1.3'.
-D
--
Microsoft: "Windows NT 4.0 now has the same user-inter
I've installed the blackdown java packages. Add this line to
/etc/apt/sources.list:
deb ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian/
woody non-free
And then:
apt-get update
apt-get install j2sdk1.3 j2sdk1.3-doc-installer
I'm actually using unstable now, but java
Crispin Wellington, Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:08:19PM +0800:
>
> Has anyone managed to install a working java plugin into the woody
> packages? If so, how?
>
Start mozilla as root. Go to http://java.sun.com/ . Mozilla
should pop up a window asking if you want to install the required
plugin. Fo
On one system I have potato and the ximian packages installed. I have
java installed in my mozilla/galeon by a symlink...
ls -alF /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 57 Feb 15 18:57
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so ->
/usr/java/jre1.3
Hi,
I finally solved most of my problems with JAVA and Mozilla !
I use the IBM JRE which is very verbose when loading applets compared to the
SUN JRE which is very quiet ! I have both installed and I can switch from one
to another by changing the symlink in the Mozilla plugins dir.
I'd like to
Georges Goncalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le -08.31.2001 22:18:13-, « Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) »
> a écrit quelques phrases célèbres sur « Re: Mozilla & JAVA »
>
> KW> > Arrhhh I think I tested all the
> KW> > poss
Hi Georges!
On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Georges Goncalves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really wonder if the SID version of Mozilla is compiled with Java Support
> enabled...
>
> Why do I ask? Because I can't get it to work. I've tryed both a full manual
> Java JRE install and an automatic install (http://www
se
is that it has never tried to contact us. --Bill Watterson
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:03:54PM +0200, Georges Goncalves wrote:
> Le -08.31.2001 22:18:13-, ? Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ?
> a ?crit quelques phrases c?l?bres sur ? Re: Mozilla & JAVA ?
>
> KW> > Arrr
Le -08.31.2001 22:18:13-, « Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) »
a écrit quelques phrases célèbres sur « Re: Mozilla & JAVA »
KW> > Arrhhh I think I tested all the
KW> > possibilities and I still don't know what I'm doing wrong :((
KW>
K
Original Message
Subject: Re: Mozilla & JAVA
Resent-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:55:55 +0200
From: Georges Goncalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Reference
Georges Goncalves wrote:after making sure the link in mozilla/plugins/
I quit Moz and restart... about:plugins still empty...
Arrhhh I think I tested all the
possibilities and I still don't know what I'm doing wrong :((
I've about decided there's a glitch in
Le -08.31.2001 01:41:23-, « Jimmy Richards ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) »
a écrit quelques phrases célèbres sur « Re: Mozilla & JAVA »
JR> I had the names in my symlink command backwards, it should be
JR>
JR> ln -sv /usr/lib/j2re1.3/plugin/i386/mozilla/javaplugin_oji.so
javaplugin_oji-
Hey,
I had the names in my symlink command backwards, it should be
ln -sv /usr/lib/j2re1.3/plugin/i386/mozilla/javaplugin_oji.so
javaplugin_oji-mozilla-0.9.3.so
whilst in the /etc/alternatives. If you tried it already I'm sure that
was pretty obvious. Anyway, hope it all worked
Hi,
It's been a little while since I fixed mine, so I don't remember
for certain if this is the only thing you need, but if it alone doesn't
fix it then post again and I'll look around to see what else it was that
I did.
Go into /etc/alternatives and make the following sym
Hi,
I really wonder if the SID version of Mozilla is compiled with Java Support
enabled...
Why do I ask? Because I can't get it to work. I've tryed both a full manual
Java JRE install and an automatic install (http://www.javasoft.com and let
Mozilla be your guide :)
Everything is installed b
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:39:03 -0700
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:48:12AM -0300, Christoph Simon wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0700
> > Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see a package named libc6g-dev in debian (web search for
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:48:12AM -0300, Christoph Simon wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0700
> Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't see a package named libc6g-dev in debian (web search form, all
> > distributions). Do you mean libc6-dev? There is xlib6g-dev.
>
> That wa
Christoph Simon wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0700
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see a package named libc6g-dev in debian (web search form, all
distributions). Do you mean libc6-dev? There is xlib6g-dev.
That was on potato only (guessing...)
I'm running mozilla
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0700
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see a package named libc6g-dev in debian (web search form, all
> distributions). Do you mean libc6-dev? There is xlib6g-dev.
That was on potato only (guessing...)
> I'm running mozilla 0.9.1 built from unstable
I don't see a package named libc6g-dev in debian (web search form, all
distributions). Do you mean libc6-dev? There is xlib6g-dev.
I'm running mozilla 0.9.1 built from unstable source, and have not
been able to get java to work with it or prior builds. I tried
downloading the plugin that the ne
FYI
I've installed the unofficial debs for mozilla 0.9-1, which Robert
Bihlmeyer made available, and had no problems installing Java or other
plugins, while I do remember somebody reporing such troubles.
This time, I needed to set up a very stripped down system with
mozilla, and all of the sudden
There is currently a bug filed at bugzilla.mozilla.org which covers the
problems with java plugin installation. As expected, the xpicleanup
process keeps running after mozilla exits so that it can finish
replacing/changing/removing files that were previously in use.
Consequently, the xpicleanu
51 matches
Mail list logo
