Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-24 Thread Dotan Cohen
Thanks, Johan and Ron! -- Dotan Cohen http://bido.com http://what-is-what.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/x2r880dece01004242303k2a8c78t6545f43

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-24 Thread Ron Johnson
On 04/24/2010 01:02 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: On 24 April 2010 02:38, Ron Johnson wrote: On 04/22/2010 03:54 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: [snip] It looks to me that Backports is the best for an everyday user who values stability, and prefers to use released software version. Please let me know where I

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-24 Thread Johan Grönqvist
2010-04-24 20:02, Dotan Cohen skrev: Thanks, Ron. I don't see the contradiction: I want released software, no betas or alphas. I am using the word "stable" as in "not crashy (doesn't fall down)", not in the sense of "doesn't change". I wondered if Testing or Unstable would provide that. I use

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-24 Thread Dotan Cohen
On 24 April 2010 02:38, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 04/22/2010 03:54 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > [snip] >> >> It looks to me that Backports is the best for an everyday >> user who values stability, and prefers to use released software >> version. Please let me know where I am mistaken. Thanks. > > "stabl

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-23 Thread Thomas Ferry
Im still learning how to use mailing lists I read alot but I dont reply alot. Testing would be your best bet. If you want current you need debian unstable.. I think you can get the binary's from the experiential repo though On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 04/22/2010 03:

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-23 Thread Ron Johnson
On 04/22/2010 03:54 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: [snip] It looks to me that Backports is the best for an everyday user who values stability, and prefers to use released software version. Please let me know where I am mistaken. Thanks. "stable with current releases" is a contradiction. If you want c

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-23 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2010-04-23, Sthu Deus wrote: > Thank You for Your time and answer, Liam: > >>Or you could wait for the next stable release, or at least for the >>freeze announcement. > > Will it be 4.4 version of KDE in next release? - I thought, 4.3 - that is in > testing for now. > > I don't use KDE, so I

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-23 Thread Sthu Deus
Thank You for Your time and answer, Liam: >Or you could wait for the next stable release, or at least for the >freeze announcement. Will it be 4.4 version of KDE in next release? - I thought, 4.3 - that is in testing for now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Dotan Cohen
> Fedora 12 has KDE 4.4 and it's in a pretty stable shape. Also, it's > officially supported, > as opposed to OpenSUSE. > I used Fedora from Core 3 to 6. It got very unstable at that point, FC 6, 7, and 8 were breaking critical packages almost monthly. I am reluctant to go back. That said, I thin

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Aioanei Rares
On 04/22/2010 11:54 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: I am looking for KDE 4.4.2 and Open Office 3.2 packages for Lenny. I have found qt-kde.debian, Debian Experimental, Testing, Unstable, and Backports. It looks to me that Backports is the best for an everyday user who values stability, and prefers to use

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:13:49 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: >> It's hard for distributions to include the latest KDE SC available >> *and* deliver it as "stable". Rolling distros (such Arch Linux), which >> are always up-to-date, may fit better into this schema. >> >> > That is where a third-party repo

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Dotan Cohen
> It's hard for distributions to include the latest KDE SC available *and* > deliver it as "stable". Rolling distros (such Arch Linux), which are > always up-to-date, may fit better into this schema. > That is where a third-party repo would come in, such as Backports. Kubuntu, for all it's flaws,

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:26:07 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: >> Unfortunately, the goals of always having the latest KDE and a stable >> distro are not compatible. >> >> > Not necessarily. KDE has a regular release schedule, with a point > release about once a month. I would consider a distro that inclu

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2010-04-22, Dotan Cohen wrote: >> Have you asked other KDE contributors about their setups? >> > > Yes, there is a lot of favour towards Mandriva and Suse. Kubuntu with > Project Timelord is also being mentioned. If I jump ship from a Debian > based distro, it will likely be to Suse. Yes, you

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Dotan Cohen
> Unfortunately, the goals of always having the latest KDE and a stable distro > are not compatible. > Not necessarily. KDE has a regular release schedule, with a point release about once a month. I would consider a distro that included the latest point releases stable in the sense of no (or few)

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2010-04-22, Dotan Cohen wrote: >> I don't know of any backported binaries, so you would have to compile it >> yourself. That, however, would be a major undertaking, and presupposes >> that the latest KDE4 even compiles against the versions of the various >> libraries included in lenny. >> > > Y

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Dotan Cohen
> I don't know of any backported binaries, so you would have to compile it > yourself. That, however, would be a major undertaking, and presupposes > that the latest KDE4 even compiles against the versions of the various > libraries included in lenny. > Yes, compiling KDE is not a hassle that I wa

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2010-04-22, Dotan Cohen wrote: ---SNIP--- >From where to acquire KDE 4.4.2 in a reasonably safe manner? I don't know of any backported binaries, so you would have to compile it yourself. That, however, would be a major undertaking, and presupposes that the latest KDE4 even compiles against the

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Dotan Cohen
On 22 April 2010 12:25, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2010-04-22, Dotan Cohen wrote: >> I am looking for KDE 4.4.2 and Open Office 3.2 packages for Lenny. I >> have found qt-kde.debian, Debian Experimental, Testing, Unstable, and >> Backports. It looks to me that Backports is the best for an everyday

Re: Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2010-04-22, Dotan Cohen wrote: > I am looking for KDE 4.4.2 and Open Office 3.2 packages for Lenny. I > have found qt-kde.debian, Debian Experimental, Testing, Unstable, and > Backports. It looks to me that Backports is the best for an everyday > user who values stability, and prefers to use re

Moving to Debian: updated software

2010-04-22 Thread Dotan Cohen
I am looking for KDE 4.4.2 and Open Office 3.2 packages for Lenny. I have found qt-kde.debian, Debian Experimental, Testing, Unstable, and Backports. It looks to me that Backports is the best for an everyday user who values stability, and prefers to use released software version. Please let me know