Sam Martin a écrit :
>
> You mean test whether i can bring the raid vol up by booting into 64bit
> debian from usb?
Yes.
> i did a mdadm -e on one of the disks in the array
>
> root@HTPC-NAS:~# mdadm -E /dev/sdc1
> /dev/sdc1:
> Magic : a92b4efc
> Version : 1.2
> Feature M
On Vi, 08 feb 13, 18:25:04, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> What a horrible email client, how do you know who wrote what?
It seems to be one of those "smart" clients that defaults to html and
inserts quoting when you try to interleave your reply. Usually switching
to plain text only helps.
Kind reg
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 07:03:52PM -0700, Shane Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > Shane Johnson wrote:
> > > Sam Martin wrote:
> > > >>
> > ...174 lines snipped...
> >
> > It would be super awesome if you would trim the previously quoted
> > material to just
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Shane Johnson wrote:
> > Sam Martin wrote:
> > >>
> ...174 lines snipped...
>
> It would be super awesome if you would trim the previously quoted
> material to just the parts you are responding to before mailing. Thanks.
>
> Sorry about that -
Shane Johnson wrote:
> Sam Martin wrote:
> >>
...174 lines snipped...
It would be super awesome if you would trim the previously quoted
material to just the parts you are responding to before mailing. Thanks.
> From my experience you have to manually put it in there. Going from
> memory, I beli
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
> thanks shane. sorry, just one last thing.
>
> my mdadm.config doesn't contain reference to any devices. is this because
> it's stored on the raid members?
>
> thanks again,
> sam
>
>
> On 8 February 2013 00:10, Shane Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> On Th
brilliant, not rebuild though, you mean remount / assemble?
On 7 February 2013 23:50, Shane Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
>
>> do you know whether i could move a raid1 vol from 32bit dist to 64bit
>> dist?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7 February 2013 23:32, Shane John
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
> brilliant, not rebuild though, you mean remount / assemble?
>
>
> On 7 February 2013 23:50, Shane Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
>>
>>> do you know whether i could move a raid1 vol from 32bit dist to 64bit
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
> do you know whether i could move a raid1 vol from 32bit dist to 64bit dist?
>
>
>
>
> On 7 February 2013 23:32, Shane Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
>>
>>> could it be used without mdadm? i think the sugge
could it be used without mdadm? i think the suggestion was that if it went
wrong the disk could still be used as the "raid" stuff was on the end of
the disk?
that right?
On 7 February 2013 22:33, Shane Johnson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
>
>> Hi Pascal,
>>
>>
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
> could it be used without mdadm? i think the suggestion was that if it went
> wrong the disk could still be used as the "raid" stuff was on the end of
> the disk?
>
> that right?
>
>
> On 7 February 2013 22:33, Shane Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
> Hi Pascal,
>
> I'm not sure what top-posting is?
> I hope this isn't it!
>
> You mean test whether i can bring the raid vol up by booting into 64bit
> debian from usb?
>
> i did a mdadm -e on one of the disks in the array
>
> root@HTPC-NAS:~# md
On Jo, 07 feb 13, 13:42:34, Sam Martin wrote:
> Hi Pascal,
>
> I'm not sure what top-posting is?
> I hope this isn't it!
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#What_is_top-posting_.28and_why_shouldn.27t_I_do_it.29.3F
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and develop
Sam Martin wrote:
> I'm not sure what top-posting is?
This URL will help you learn about it:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=top+posting
> I hope this isn't it!
It was.
Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Pascal,
I'm not sure what top-posting is?
I hope this isn't it!
You mean test whether i can bring the raid vol up by booting into 64bit debian
from usb?
i did a mdadm -e on one of the disks in the array
root@HTPC-NAS:~# mdadm -E /dev/sdc1
/dev/sdc1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Versio
Hi Andrei,
Yes that's absolutely correct. I don't have anything to backup the backup to
really which is not great but better than none.
Thanks,
Sam
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 10:30:01 AM UTC, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 28 ian 13, 20:32:49, Linux-Fan wrote:
>
> > On 01/27/2013 10:13 PM
On Lu, 28 ian 13, 20:32:49, Linux-Fan wrote:
> On 01/27/2013 10:13 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
> > Thanks Frank,
> >
> > But this is kind of my backup. I don't have any capacity to backup to
> > another drive/ext HDD.
>
> Raid is not a backup.
My reading of the above was "this RAID holds my backup(
On 01/27/2013 10:13 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
> Thanks Frank,
>
> But this is kind of my backup. I don't have any capacity to backup to
> another drive/ext HDD.
Raid is not a backup. All data can easily get lost by one wrong command,
e.g. someone does rm -rf /mountpoint (accidentally, some do becau
Sam Martin a écrit :
> Thanks for reply Pascal.
Please don't top-post.
> How would I know?
mdadm -E /dev/ (e.g. /dev/sdc1)
mdadm -D /dev/ (e.g. /dev/md0)
cat /proc/mdstat
> I've just posted a question to original response, do you happen to know the
> answer?
There are two questions.
I already
Thanks Frank,
But this is kind of my backup. I don't have any capacity to backup to another
drive/ext HDD.
The OS is running off a small SSD.
I have 2x3TB drives for data running in RAID1.
I assumed with software raid, the drives couldn't be used without being part of
the RAID config, i.e. pr
Thanks for reply Pascal.
How would I know?
I've just posted a question to original response, do you happen to know the
answer?
Many thanks,
Sam
On Sunday, January 27, 2013 5:20:03 PM UTC, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Sam Martin a ï¿œcrit :
>
> > The raid is a simple mirror at th
Hello,
Sam Martin a écrit :
> The raid is a simple mirror at the moment, but I'm guessing I cannot
> use it without mdadm if it did go wrong?
You can use a RAID 1 partition as a standard partition if the RAID
superblock format is 0.90 or 1.0 (metadata located at the end of the
partition) but not
On 01/27/2013 02:18 PM, Sam Martin wrote:
> I'm about to reinstall linux using 64bit wheezy dist rather than the 32bit on
> i inadvertently used.
>
> I've got a copy of /etc but I'm concerned that in /etc/mdadm/mdadm.config
> there is no reference to the array.
>
> The only lines that are unco
Hi all,
I'm about to reinstall linux using 64bit wheezy dist rather than the 32bit on i
inadvertently used.
I've got a copy of /etc but I'm concerned that in /etc/mdadm/mdadm.config there
is no reference to the array.
The only lines that are uncommented are
CREATE owner=root group=disk mode=
24 matches
Mail list logo
