Arthur Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hugh Lawson wrote, on 31/03/08 00:06:
> > Arthur Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> The smbfs package, which depends on samba-common includes the
> >> mount.cifs binary:
> > [ snip ]
> >
> >> The format of the /etc/fstab entry changed, requiring t
Hugh Lawson wrote, on 31/03/08 00:06:
Arthur Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The smbfs package, which depends on samba-common includes the
mount.cifs binary:
[ snip ]
The format of the /etc/fstab entry changed, requiring the IP address
of the remote system rather than just the NetBIOS na
Arthur Marsh wrote:
The format of the /etc/fstab entry changed, requiring the IP address
of the remote system rather than just the NetBIOS name:
In my system, now using smbfs 3.0.28-2+b1, I've always cifs-mounted
Windows shares using the name of the host, not the IP.
There is, however, an
Arthur Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The smbfs package, which depends on samba-common includes the
> mount.cifs binary:
[ snip ]
> The format of the /etc/fstab entry changed, requiring the IP address
> of the remote system rather than just the NetBIOS name:
>
> # old format, should all b
Amit Uttamchandani wrote, on 30/03/08 07:40:
As smbfs is no longer maintained, what is the proper way to mount samba shares
in linux?
Most of the user guides out there rely on 'mount -t smbfs ' to mount
windows shares. I heard there is a mount -t cifs? But that doesn't seem to work
in etc
As smbfs is no longer maintained, what is the proper way to mount samba shares
in linux?
Most of the user guides out there rely on 'mount -t smbfs ' to mount
windows shares. I heard there is a mount -t cifs? But that doesn't seem to work
in etch box that I have.
In the meantime, I am usin
6 matches
Mail list logo
