Am 11.01.2014 14:15, schrieb Brian:
> You could do
>
>apt-get --reinstall install -o Dpkg::Options::"--force-confask"
>
> to force a conffile prompt.
>
> What happens?
>
I'm being asked which version of the configuration file I would like to
see used. Great. Your suggestion also helped me
On 2014-01-11 13:20 +0100, Malte Forkel wrote:
> Am 11.01.2014 11:53, schrieb Dominique Dumont:
>> Did you change the content of the conffile in the package ?
>> (i.e. the content of the *delivered* configuration file between package
>> version n and version n-1)
>>
> No. The configuration file
On Sat 11 Jan 2014 at 13:21:06 +0100, Malte Forkel wrote:
> Am 11.01.2014 12:02, schrieb Brian:
> >
> > Ckeck that the file in question is a conffile:
> >
> >dpkg --status
> >
> It's a conffile.
You could do
apt-get --reinstall install -o Dpkg::Options::"--force-confask"
to force a
Am 11.01.2014 12:02, schrieb Brian:
>
> Ckeck that the file in question is a conffile:
>
>dpkg --status
>
It's a conffile.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lis
Am 11.01.2014 11:53, schrieb Dominique Dumont:
> Did you change the content of the conffile in the package ?
> (i.e. the content of the *delivered* configuration file between package
> version n and version n-1)
>
No. The configuration file did not change between versions.
Is dpkg smart enough
On Sat 11 Jan 2014 at 11:04:08 +0100, Malte Forkel wrote:
> I have a question regarding the handling of locally modified conffiles
> on package upgrades.
>
> When I installed a new version of a self-written native package, I
> noticed that I was not asked whether I wanted to keep or replace a
> c
On Saturday 11 January 2014 11:04:08 Malte Forkel wrote:
> What might I be missing?
Did you change the content of the conffile in the package ?
(i.e. the content of the *delivered* configuration file between package
version n and version n-1)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
Hello,
I have a question regarding the handling of locally modified conffiles
on package upgrades.
When I installed a new version of a self-written native package, I
noticed that I was not asked whether I wanted to keep or replace a
configuration file that I had modified locally. After the upgrad
8 matches
Mail list logo