On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 09:38:42 -0500
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 14:25:51 -, Greg wrote:
> > I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of
> > apt sources.
> >
> > I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to modernize, or is the
> > modern method intended
On 2025-02-08, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 02:25:51PM -, Greg wrote:
>>On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
>>>
>>> I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
>>> suppliers upgrade what they ship.
>>
>>I haven't been following the long thread about the
On 2025-02-08, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 14:25:51 -, Greg wrote:
>> I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
>> sources.
>>
>> I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to modernize, or is the modern
>> method intended for some future date? As
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 14:25:51 -, Greg wrote:
> I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
> sources.
>
> I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to modernize, or is the modern
> method intended for some future date? As everything works nicely on this
> new insta
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 02:25:51PM -, Greg wrote:
On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
suppliers upgrade what they ship.
I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
sources.
I'm running Bookworm
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 14:25:51 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
> On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
> >
> > I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
> > suppliers upgrade what they ship.
>
> I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of
> apt sources.
>
>
On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
>
> I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
> suppliers upgrade what they ship.
I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
sources.
I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to modernize, or is the modern
me
With the previous discussion on modernizing one's apt sources files, I
went ahead and did it on two of my trixie installations.
The two original sources files were preserved, which might be useful
for some oddball installations.
Note that sources.list, which resides in /etc/apt, is replaced by
de
8 matches
Mail list logo
