On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 08:18:29 +0200
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:07:20AM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
> > Hellow,
> >
> > Celejar writes:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
> > > address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spa
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:31:29 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
> On 06.04.2021 01:14, Celejar wrote:
> >> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400
> >> Dan Ritter wrote:
> >> Because it doesn't work. If it worked as well as, say, moving your
> >> SSH port*, I would encourage it. It does not.
> > S
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 16:18, wrote:
> Personally, I think that Gmail is bad, because it not only
> harvests your data (you gave them your permission), but also
> mine (I didn't ;-)
Hi all,
I completely agree with this statement, for private email.
It is an excellent point.
Whereas when subscribi
On 06.04.2021 01:14, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
Because it doesn't work. If it worked as well as, say, moving your
SSH port*, I would encourage it. It does not.
Source? Is this your personal experience, or do you have some other
basis for this? Cloudfla
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:07:20AM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
> Hellow,
>
> Celejar writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
> > address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam / fraud
> > bots?
>
> Personally i use Gmail. That is all.
On Mon, 05 Apr 2021 21:31:16 -0400
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I use some GMX accounts, and they apparently don't support plus
> > addressing (I just tried, and the message was refused with "550
> > Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable."). I suppose it would be
> > nice if they did suppo
> I use some GMX accounts, and they apparently don't support plus
> addressing (I just tried, and the message was refused with "550
> Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable."). I suppose it would be
> nice if they did support it, but I can't really fault them for not
> supporting a non-sta
Hellow,
Celejar writes:
> Hi,
>
> What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
> address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam / fraud
> bots?
Personally i use Gmail. That is all.
Thanks for reading my thought ^^^
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _和合團結
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 19:39:43 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > > Okay, but why isn't trying to limit spammers getting hold of an address
> > > > a logical part of a defense in depth strategy?
> > >
> > > Because it do
On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 20:18 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 19:39 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > With experiences like that, you should be already well on your way to
> > taking care of this:
> >
> > https://www.spamhaus.org/css/removal/record/2600:3c03::f
Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 19:39 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> With experiences like that, you should be already well on your way to
> taking care of this:
>
> https://www.spamhaus.org/css/removal/record/2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe25:c4ae
>
> Your emails keep going into Spam/Bulk fol
On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 19:39 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > > Okay, but why isn't trying to limit spammers getting hold of an address
> > > > a logical part of a defense in depth strategy?
> > >
> > > Because it doe
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > > Okay, but why isn't trying to limit spammers getting hold of an address
> > > a logical part of a defense in depth strategy?
> >
> > Because it doesn't work. If it worked as well as, say, moving
> > your SSH port*, I
On Mon, 05 Apr 2021 16:50:30 -0400
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Celejar [2021-04-05 14:49:15] wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote:
> >> Celejar wrote:
> >> > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
> >> > address on the web while avoiding hav
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:57:50 +0100
Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:10:05 -0400
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:36:39 +0100
> > Joe wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:49:15 -0400
> > > Celejar wrote:
> > >
>
> > > > Okay, but why isn't trying to limit spammers getting h
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 04:14:52PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Celejar wrote:
> > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400
> > > Dan Ritter wrote:
> > >
> > > > Celejar wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > What's the recommended modern b
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:10:05 -0400
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:36:39 +0100
> Joe wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:49:15 -0400
> > Celejar wrote:
> >
> > > Okay, but why isn't trying to limit spammers getting hold of an
> > > address a logical part of a defense in depth strategy
Celejar [2021-04-05 14:49:15] wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote:
>> Celejar wrote:
>> > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
>> > address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam / fraud
>> > bots?
>> Assume that every addres
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > Celejar wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
> > > > address on the web while avoid
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:36:39 +0100
Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:49:15 -0400
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > Celejar wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact
> > > > em
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Celejar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
> > > address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam / fraud
> > > bots?
> >
> > Assume that e
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:49:15 -0400
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Celejar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact
> > > email address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam
> > >
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 02:49:15PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Celejar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
> > > address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam /
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
> > address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam / fraud
> > bots?
>
> Assume that every address will be hit by spammers a
Celejar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
> address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam / fraud
> bots?
Assume that every address will be hit by spammers and scammers.
Put in appropriate antispam and antimalware precautions.
Hi,
What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam / fraud
bots?
I'm aware of many of the techniques in use, such as the ones discussed
here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23002711/how-to-show-email-addres
26 matches
Mail list logo
