rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
...
> ... Sometimes I feel
> like an idiot.
>
> All seems well.
:)
i've had days like that... glad you figured it out.
completely OT from your issue, but today i finally upgraded
my stable partition from whatever it was on (last major update
was probably a year
Intentionally top posting:
Thanks to all who replied, I got the Arris DG2470A modem (/ router) working in
bridge mode with my existing router (Ubiquiti Edge Router X).
I made a dumb mistake -- I had my router and another computer plugged into the
Arris (I used the other computer to configure
On Fri 28 Apr 2023 at 14:25:20 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Some key phrases / sub topics:
>* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
>* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
>* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
[ … ]
> I
On 4/28/23 20:25, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Some key phrases / sub topics:
* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
I'm tired but I'm lost at your set up and
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Some key phrases / sub topics:
>* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
>* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
>* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
> I've now signed up to a new ISP (Astound
Some key phrases / sub topics:
* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
Aside: I'm in a catch 22 -- my new, cable-based ISP (Astound / RCN) says my
questions are o
Replaying to myself:
To get iIP information use the following:
# mmcli -m 0 -b 1
General| dbus path: /org/freedesktop/ModemManager1/Bearer/1
| type: default
Status | co
On 5/25/21 10:33 PM, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
Hi !
How about using dhclient ?
Does not work (like udhcpc).
Greg
Hi there,
I managed to connect _but_ I do no know how to obtain address. I tried:
udhcpc -q -f -n -i wwan0
no luck, unfortunately. Any suggestions?
To connect I use the following:
# mmcli -m 0 --simple-connect="apn=darmowy"
successfully connected the modem
#
On Tuesday, March 09, 2021 03:54:18 PM David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 09 Mar 2021 at 08:12:47 (-0500), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I have DSL service, and a spare modem that I've occasionally put in
> > service (for testing the "main" modem) and have not had to notify
routers.
MAC address is only visible inside of one Ethernet network, so anyone on
the other side of the router doesn't know your MAC address.
Both DOCSIS (cable) modem and DSL modem can run in one of two modes:
* Router mode. In this mode it acts as a router (Level 3 device) and your
Ethernet tr
e unsatisfactory,
> > > then before you complained, you'd want to check that it's not your
> > > modem at fault. Would you expect your spare modem to work, because it
> > > has a different MAC from what's expected by the ISP's end of the line.
t; I realise that, but if your service were to become unsatisfactory,
> > then before you complained, you'd want to check that it's not your
> > modem at fault. Would you expect your spare modem to work, because it
> > has a different MAC from what's expected by the ISP&#
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 10:18:51 +0200
Grzesiek Sójka wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> To be more specific: I already installed Debian Sid and the tablet is HP
> Elite X2 1013 G3. I'm trying to learn how to use the modem mentioned to
> connect to the internet.
Disclaimer: I have no
Hi there,
To be more specific: I already installed Debian Sid and the tablet is HP
Elite X2 1013 G3. I'm trying to learn how to use the modem mentioned to
connect to the internet.
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:33:58 +0200
Grzesiek Sójka wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a tablet equipped with the modem mentioned above. I do not have
> any experience with such devices. I would be grateful for some links
> with some information how to use it on Debian.
Are you tr
Grzesiek Sójka wrote:
> I have a tablet equipped with the modem mentioned above. I do not have
> any experience with such devices. I would be grateful for some links
> with some information how to use it on Debian.
Is your tablet running debian - can you share make and model of the tablet?
Hi there,
I have a tablet equipped with the modem mentioned above. I do not have
any experience with such devices. I would be grateful for some links
with some information how to use it on Debian.
regards
Eri wrote:
> I'm using Debian Bullseye on a Thinkpad T490s with FIBOCOM L830-EB-00 WWAN
> modem.
> I would like to know if it is possible to make voice calls with that
> modem. I was able to make a phone call with AT COMMANDS
> ATD + NUMBER;
> or answer
> ATA
>
&
I'm using Debian Bullseye on a Thinkpad T490s with FIBOCOM L830-EB-00 WWAN
modem.
I would like to know if it is possible to make voice calls with that modem.
I was able to make a phone call with AT COMMANDS
ATD + NUMBER;
or answer
ATA
Tha user manual of the modem says that voice calls are al
On Monday, June 18, 2018 08:44:20 AM Michael Stone wrote:
> He really doesn't want a sensible solution, just let it go.
+1
On 06/18/2018 07:17 AM, David wrote:
On 1 June 2018 at 00:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What is the make and model number of each computer?
No longer a relevant question.
I have purchas
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:17:21PM +1000, David wrote:
On 1 June 2018 at 00:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What is the make and model number of each computer?
He really doesn't want a se
On 1 June 2018 at 00:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What is the make and model number of each computer?
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 08:07:15AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 22:26 -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Richard Owlett writes:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers
> did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a nul
On 2018-06-07, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> This depends on what you mean by "universal". It was intended to be a
> protocol for computers to use to communicate with peripherals;
> "universal" in this context was restricted to peripherals.
And to the planet earth rather than all the way to the furthe
On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 22:26 -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Richard Owlett writes:
>
> > I have two computers with USB ports.
> > I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers
> > did.
> > Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropr
Richard Owlett writes:
> On 06/01/2018 08:21 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
back and plays "gadget" [...]
Richard Owlett writes:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
> software at both ends.
>
> The underlying problem is that both end
On Fri 01 Jun 2018 at 09:08:53 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/01/2018 08:21 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >>>The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
> >>>back and plays "gadget" [...]
> >
> >>The gadge
tarted out talking about RS232 and null modem cables, so
don't be surprised if people are having trouble figuring out what you're
asking for. Then you asked for better ideas. Then you got mad about all
the ideas and started laughing hysterically. I have no idea what you
actually want at this
vised, USB
Ethernet is the way to go.
We are now leaving the realms of simplicity and performance for more
subjective lands of doing things "just because" or for the retro
computing experience. You can certainly use a pair of USB serial adaptors
and then run a null modem cable between them
On 06/01/2018 09:01 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:56:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 05/31/2018 06:58 PM, David Wright wrote:
(thanks for your link) gives an idea of the price, and in this case I
can see some justification for it because they describe the
electronics
nux version is one of the worse compatibility violators.
> > The "way back machine" to simulate a "null modem" serial cable
> > exists, as you've seen, but it's rarely the best solution for
> > nowadays's needs,
>
> "Best" is not an
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:01:57 -0400
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:56:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >On 05/31/2018 06:58 PM, David Wright wrote:
> >>(thanks for your link) gives an idea of the price, and in this case
> >>I can see some justification for it because they de
On Fri 01 Jun 2018 at 05:26:01 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/01/2018 01:27 AM, deloptes wrote:
> >Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >>I have two computers with USB ports.
> >>I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> >>T
On 06/01/2018 08:21 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
back and plays "gadget" [...]
The gadget API is the programming API off
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:56:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 05/31/2018 06:58 PM, David Wright wrote:
(thanks for your link) gives an idea of the price, and in this case I
can see some justification for it because they describe the
electronics hidden inside the plugs (we hope).
But consid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
> > back and plays "gadget" [...]
> The gadget API is the programming API offered by the kernel for the OTG
> ports: no
> The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
> back and plays "gadget" (the jargon term, somewhat unfortunate
> as search engine fodder). There seems to be something out there
> for that, e.g. [2].
The gadget API is the programming API offered by the kernel for the OTG
ports: n
>> In some cases one of the two computers's USB port is an "OTG" port,
>> meaning that it can act either as "master" or not, in which case you can
>> just use a regular USB cable (and usually you then configure the OTG
>> side to pretend it's a network card, so it ends up looking to the
>> software
On 06/01/2018 01:27 AM, deloptes wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
software at both ends.
J., why not take a cross
to do file
copying/sharing over RS232 - even I would not actually attempt to implement.
The "way back machine" to simulate a "null modem" serial cable exists,
as you've seen, but it's rarely the best solution for nowadays's needs,
"Best" is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:27:13AM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> > I have two computers with USB ports.
> > I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> > Then we used RS232-
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
> software at both ends.
>
J., why not take a crossover cable - all pc
> If none of that are options, you can resort to using an "ethernet
> dongle" on both sides and an ethernet cable between the two.
[ If one of the two computers has a free ethernet port, you can of
course also such a dongle on the other computer. ]
BTW, those ethernet dongles can be found pret
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What kind of "communicate" do you need there?
The "way back machine" to simulate a "null modem" serial cable exists,
as you've seen, but it&
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:21:27AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software software
> at both ends.
>
>
Hi.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:21:27AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software software
> at bot
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
software at both ends.
The underlying problem is that both ends egotistically expect to be
*MASTER*.
The hard
On Tue 02 Jan 2018 at 08:50:13 (+0100), john doe wrote:
> On 1/2/2018 8:16 AM, john doe wrote:
> >On 1/2/2018 8:01 AM, Tom Furie wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:52:31AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> >>
> >>>My default route is not 192.168.1.1 and host(1) gives me that
> >>>same error.
> >>
> >>Wha
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 02:59:41PM +, Glenn English wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Max Power wrote:
>
> > with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been
> > replaced
>
> Wipe your disk and install Buster. You get route++ back.
Worst advice ever.
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Max Power wrote:
> with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
Wipe your disk and install Buster. You get route++ back.
Or create some shell scripts...
--
Glenn English
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 12:12:47AM +0100, Max Power wrote:
> Hi guys,
> with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
> but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router gateway...?
> # route
> gateway = home.telecomitalia.
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 12:12:47AM +0100, Max Power wrote:
> with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
> but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router gateway...?
> # route
> gateway = home.telecomitalia.it
> # ip rout
On 1/2/2018 8:16 AM, john doe wrote:
On 1/2/2018 8:01 AM, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:52:31AM +0100, john doe wrote:
My default route is not 192.168.1.1 and host(1) gives me that same
error.
What the error actually means is that there is no reverse DNS resolution
for that IP
On 1/2/2018 8:01 AM, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:52:31AM +0100, john doe wrote:
My default route is not 192.168.1.1 and host(1) gives me that same error.
What the error actually means is that there is no reverse DNS resolution
for that IP address, in other words the IP address
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:52:31AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> My default route is not 192.168.1.1 and host(1) gives me that same error.
What the error actually means is that there is no reverse DNS resolution
for that IP address, in other words the IP address cannot be resolved to
its hostname. It
On 1/2/2018 7:45 AM, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:38:54AM +0100, john doe wrote:
Looks like 192.168.1.1 is not your default route.
What led you to that conclusion?
My default route is not 192.168.1.1 and host(1) gives me that same error.
--
John Doe
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:38:54AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> Looks like 192.168.1.1 is not your default route.
What led you to that conclusion?
Cheers,
Tom
--
A good scapegoat is hard to find.
A guilty conscience is the mother of invention.
-- Carolyn Wells
signature.asc
Descr
On 1/2/2018 7:15 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Tue 02 Jan 2018 at 06:25:29 (+0100), john doe wrote:
On 1/2/2018 12:12 AM, Max Power wrote:
Hi guys,
with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/rout
On Tue 02 Jan 2018 at 06:25:29 (+0100), john doe wrote:
> On 1/2/2018 12:12 AM, Max Power wrote:
> >Hi guys,
> >with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
> >but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router ga
On 1/2/2018 12:12 AM, Max Power wrote:
Hi guys,
with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router gateway...?
# route
gateway = home.telecomitalia.it
# ip route
gateway = 192.168.1.1
Thanks
Hi guys,
with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router gateway...?
# route
gateway = home.telecomitalia.it
# ip route
gateway = 192.168.1.1
Thanks for reply, Max Power.
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 09:29:30PM +1000, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
> -Original Message- From: Dan Ritter
> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 8:08 PM
> To: Stephen Grant Brown
> Cc: Debian User
> Subject: Re: iinet modem, esternal usb hdd
>
> On Thu, Sep 07, 201
-Original Message-
From: Dan Ritter
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 8:08 PM
To: Stephen Grant Brown
Cc: Debian User
Subject: Re: iinet modem, esternal usb hdd
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:39:57PM +1000, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
Hi All,
I am seeing the external usb hdd connected to
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:39:57PM +1000, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am seeing the external usb hdd connected to the iinet modem via the usb
> port as being accessible via both Samba and DLNA.
>
> How do I access it on a Debian machine.
https://wiki.debian.org/S
Hi All,
I am seeing the external usb hdd connected to the iinet modem via the usb port
as being accessible via both Samba and DLNA.
How do I access it on a Debian machine.
Yours Sincerely
Stephen Grant Brown
.549445] usbserial: USB Serial support registered for generic
[6.550227] usbcore: registered new interface driver sierra
[6.550235] usbserial: USB Serial support registered for Sierra USB modem
[6.550251] sierra 2-1.4:1.0: Sierra USB modem converter detected
[6.550748] usb 2-1.4:
x27;
Dec 11 08:50:47 mohot pppd[256]: In file /etc/ppp/peers/alditalk: unrecognized
option '/dev/ttyUSB0'
Dec 11 08:50:56 mohot kernel: [ 17.462944] usb 1-1: GSM modem (1-port)
converter now attached to ttyUSB0
root@mohot:~#
Is there a way to get this dependency included in the boot pr
On Friday 20 November 2015 14:04:48 Ric Moore wrote:
> Charles Forsburg has passed away.
> http://www.anewtradition.com/obituaries/obituary/12060_Charles_Alton_F
>orsberg
Oh fudge. Damn. His rzsz software that I last built at version 3.3.6,
but made some serious speedups in, for the os9/nitros
Charles Forsburg has passed away.
http://www.anewtradition.com/obituaries/obituary/12060_Charles_Alton_Forsberg
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
h
On Sat, October 24, 2015 8:37 am, chris wrote:
> You can get a cradle point or something that act as a plain cellular to
> Ethernet bridge and then you won't be exposed to the mess of cellular and
> you will have a pure Ethernet interface . I don't think you will get
> anything directly from the ce
I have been searching without success for user reports on MiFi 4G LTE
Global USB Modem U620L with Debian.
The device is a current offering by Verizon, and claims compatibility with
Ubuntu 13 & 14, and certain versions of Fedora and Suse.
Russ
Reco wrote:
> Please don't do so. Ssh only provides SOCKS4 proxy, and SOCKS4 can not tunnel
> DNS requests (or any UDP traffic for that matter).
How old is your information on that? Even in Squeeze the man-page for
ssh says:
,
| Currently the SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 protocols are supported, and s
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:36:37AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2015 11:01:25 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
> >
>
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
>
> > > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
>
> > > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:
On Friday 19 June 2015 11:01:25 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
> > > Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > > Mike McClain wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:01:25 +0300
Reco wrote:
> >
> > When network.proxy.socks_remote_dns is set to true, the DNS
> > requests are sent through the SOCKS connection and delivered to
> > your computer at home (which ultimately is sent to your ISP but you
> > already thrust it with that informat
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
> >
>
> > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
>
> >
>
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> > > Mike McClain wrote:
>
> > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Ri
On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
>
> Richard Owlett wrote:
> > Mike McClain wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > >> Scarletdown wrote:
> > >>> How about a portable wireless hotspot device and ser
Hi.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
> Mike McClain wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> Scarletdown wrote:
> >>> How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
> >>
> >> I was leaning away from that solution - unsure
Mike McClain wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how thos
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Scarletdown wrote:
> >How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
>
> I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
> implications when using personal hotspot.
>
> >The
> >way I understand how those work, y
re good on multiple bands, and others which are tied to
a specific carrier.
LTE is often called 4G. Advanced CDMA and GSM services (high
speed, relatively) are called 3G. Basic CDMA and GSM services
are only slightly faster than a 56K modem, and are called 2G.
You might want to look at T-Mo
S?
Yes
I'd suggest that a laptop with WiFi will work in urban areas fairly well - free
WiFi in coffee shops / malls / supermarkets / convenience stores etc.
Project Specification: Replace current 56k dial up modem with
"object" connected via cell network.
[P.S. my nephew who h
S?
Yes
I'd suggest that a laptop with WiFi will work in urban areas fairly well - free
WiFi in coffee shops / malls / supermarkets / convenience stores etc.
Project Specification: Replace current 56k dial up modem with
"object" connected via cell network.
[P.S. my nephew who h
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how those work, you will have your Internet
service with you no matter where you are, as lon
ones which can be hooked up via USB, cell modems
attached via either USB or ethernet, and "hotspot" devices which
attach to your network via wifi.
I have personal rather than technological reasons to avoid
putting a phone in the mix. Initially I was thinking of a USB
"modem&qu
LTE. Verizon and Sprint
> use CDMA and LTE, on different bands. AT&T and T-Mobile use GSM
> and LTE, again on different bands. You can buy some devices
> which are good on multiple bands, and others which are tied to
> a specific carrier.
>
> LTE is often called 4G. Advanc
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
>
> I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
> physical location.
>
> I was assuming that meant connecting via cell
Hi Richard.
I faced a similar situation although a bit differently a few months ago.
The only WISP in the area announced they were shutting down the present
service which ran at 512 kbps and would offer upgrades to a new service
that runs 10 Mbps. Fine, but what they did not say officially was th
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service? The way I
understand how those work, you will have your Internet service with you
no matter where you are, as long as you can get a signal from your provider.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
with really good mobile / "cell" coverage - though a
deal faster than 56k. I wouldn't want to use one to keep my system updated, for
example.
If you've money, a satellite modem will work anywhere that isn't a Faraday cage
where a
GPS might also work - but it is high cos
s
which are good on multiple bands, and others which are tied to
a specific carrier.
LTE is often called 4G. Advanced CDMA and GSM services (high
speed, relatively) are called 3G. Basic CDMA and GSM services
are only slightly faster than a 56K modem, and are called 2G.
You might want to look at T-Mob
ion.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
Is that correct?
What questions should I be asking?
Please note that I am strongly text, rather than graphics, oriented.
Comments &/or questions I should be asking.
Thank you.
You want Cable or DSL *and* a mobile 3G/4G modem. The w
hatever to being considered
'normal'? [snicker]
*and* a mobile 3G/4G modem. The wireless
thing will be severely restricted in the the amount of data you
can move through it.
Possibly true. Depends on definition of "severely" ;)
Typically 5-6 GBs per month.
You optimist
&/or questions I should be asking.
> >
> > Thank you.
>
> You want Cable or DSL *and* a mobile 3G/4G modem. The wireless thing
> will be severely restricted in the the amount of data you can move
> through it. Typically 5-6 GBs per month.
Richard is probably not goi
ect?
What questions should I be asking?
Please note that I am strongly text, rather than graphics, oriented.
Comments &/or questions I should be asking.
Thank you.
You want Cable or DSL *and* a mobile 3G/4G modem. The wireless thing
will be severely restricted in the the amount of data you c
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to
one physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
Is that correct?
What questions should I be asking?
Please note
John Kerr Anderson
> I recently upgraded my HP mini from Debian Wheezy to Jessie. In Debian
> Wheezy the bluetooth manager had an easy setting when you set up a
> bluetooth phone. It would ask if you wanted to set up mobile broadband with
> the phone. Unfortunately, in Jessie I cannot figure out
1 - 100 of 3502 matches
Mail list logo
