Re: Minimum specs - unsubscribe

2005-08-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe On Sat August 20 2005 05:23 am, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > * Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050820 04:33]: > > The *absolute* minimum is a 386. > > Not any more. Support for real 386 processor has been dropped: > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-up

Re: Minimum specs

2005-08-20 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050820 04:33]: > The *absolute* minimum is a 386. Not any more. Support for real 386 processor has been dropped: http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.html#s-new-kernel IIRC the problem was, that a c library only supports

Re: Minimum specs

2005-08-19 Thread Brett
Ian wrote: I was wondering, what are the absolute minimum specs of a machine you could put Debian on, using a minimalistic WM, such as xfce or Fluxbox. One of my teachers has a few 500Mhz Celeron machines with like 64MB of RAM, and I was wondering what cool things I could do to them. I am

Re: Minimum specs

2005-08-19 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:21:52PM -0500, Ian wrote: > I was wondering, what are the absolute minimum specs of a machine you could > put Debian on, using a minimalistic WM, such as xfce or Fluxbox. One of my > teachers has a few 500Mhz Celeron machines with like 64MB of RAM,

Minimum specs

2005-08-19 Thread Ian
I was wondering, what are the absolute minimum specs of a machine you could put Debian on, using a minimalistic WM, such as xfce or Fluxbox. One of my teachers has a few 500Mhz Celeron machines with like 64MB of RAM, and I was wondering what cool things I could do to them.-- "If practice