Re: Metapackaging

2024-08-21 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed Aug 21, 2024 at 12:47 PM BST, Greg Wooledge wrote: > The only way I've used equivs is to produce a package named mta-local > which looks like this: Yes, there's a distinction between satisfying a virtual dependency, like mta-local, and the use I outlined. The virtual dependency one is proba

Re: Metapackaging

2024-08-21 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:57:06 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Tue Aug 20, 2024 at 1:55 PM BST, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > You're saying that you use equivs to create packages that have the SAME > > NAMES as Debian packages?? > > That's entirely the point of it, surely. You want to convince th

Re: Metapackaging

2024-08-21 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Tue Aug 20, 2024 at 1:55 PM BST, Greg Wooledge wrote: > You're saying that you use equivs to create packages that have the SAME > NAMES as Debian packages?? That's entirely the point of it, surely. You want to convince the packaging system that you have dependency $FOO satisfied, even if you do

Re: Metapackaging

2024-08-20 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 12:26:39 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Sun Aug 18, 2024 at 5:32 PM BST, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 17:08:00 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > I've long felt that they were overcomplicated in themselves: the > > > ideal UX should be not much mor

Re: Metapackaging

2024-08-20 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Sun Aug 18, 2024 at 5:32 PM BST, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 17:08:00 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > I've long felt that they were overcomplicated in themselves: the > > ideal UX should be not much more than "equivs package-name" => > > ./package-name.deb generated, IMHO.

Re: Metapackaging

2024-08-18 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 17:08:00 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > I've long felt that they were overcomplicated in themselves: the > ideal UX should be not much more than "equivs package-name" => > ./package-name.deb generated, IMHO. I once had ambitions to add > that UX (either as a patch to equiv

Re: Metapackaging

2024-08-18 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 10:38 PM BST, Dmitrii Odintcov wrote: > The existing tutorials on `equivs` tools are few and not very > detailed, so I'm looking for some clarification. > > What do `equivs-control`/`build` do beyond what can already be > accomplished with a `DEBIAN/control` file and `dpkg --

Metapackaging

2024-08-15 Thread Dmitrii Odintcov
Hi, The existing tutorials on `equivs` tools are few and not very detailed, so I'm looking for some clarification. What do `equivs-control`/`build` do beyond what can already be accomplished with a `DEBIAN/control` file and `dpkg --build`? Thanks